Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
31 minutes ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Like you always stay on topic. I will say what I want,harry.

Posted 269 days ago.

harryanderson

"What do you do to support WV and the republican party,harry?"

That's not germane to this thread. If you'd like to start a thread on this subject, perhaps we could discuss it.

Posted 269 days ago.

Harry, the WV republican. Lol What do you do to support WV and the republican party,harry? I mean besides preaching to us poor dumb real West Virginians?

Posted 269 days ago.

harryanderson

Good point, Random21. Thanks for responding to my argument instead of to me.

How should we interpret this? If 76% of us believe warming will be a serious problem and 63% think the Feds should act, but only 6% of us feel motivated to act even by voting, we may make several possible inferences:

1. It may suggest that over half of us would rather let bureaucrats in Washington solve our problems instead of solving them ourselves.

2. It may suggest a tendency toward fatalism. We feel we are powerless, and that our votes don’t count.

3. Your suggestion, that propaganda has scared many of us into believing that warming is a problem, has some merit. However, a counter propaganda campaign has scared many of us into fearing action. Whether or not these two campaigns cancel each other out, I can’t say.

Posted 269 days ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit,

I don’t post to bait you. However, I do realize that perceptions are important. I can see how your frustration could make you feel that way.

If you imagine you’re being baited, you should either refrain from responding or confine your response to the substance of what I wrote instead of intimating that I have no right to identify as a West Virginian.

I’m a freedom-loving American. That means you don’t get to tell me what cultural or ethnic group I should identify with.

Posted 269 days ago.

RANDOM21

The same poll found only 6% we worried enough to effect the way they vote. like many other polls, people and give the answer they think is wanted. Ain't no way 29% of the citizens of WV are knowledgeable other than what they have been scared into believing, not by researching it themselves.

Posted 270 days ago.

Tiredofit

Of us? Have you moved to Wv Harry? Of course not, keep baiting not biting.

Posted 270 days ago.

harryanderson

The anti-science propaganda campaign is failing to convince West Virginians that carbon emissions aren’t harmful, according to a study by Stanford University Professor Jon Krosnick.

The study found about West Viriginians: 1. 73% of us believe past warming has been caused by humans. 2. 76% of us believe warming will be a serious problems for the US. 3. 63% of us believe the Feds should do more to address warming.

*******democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Stanford-Climate-Polling-West-Virginia-2013.pdf

Posted 270 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

"Real Science" wasn't that a science fiction movie about a made up person..........you know like calling Climate Scintetstestes "Real scientists"

Posted 310 days ago.

mythravere

Thought you were done with posting on these threads? LOL!

Posted 340 days ago.

mythravere

a·po·lit·i·cal (p-lt-kl) adj. 1. Having no interest in or association with politics. 2. Having no political relevance or importance

Posted 340 days ago.

Tiredofit

Yeah myth tell me what is a political these days.

Posted 340 days ago.

mythravere

Cal Thomas=conservative columnist=me disregarding anything he has to say.

Find a source that is apolitical in its operations and then I will give it a look.

Posted 340 days ago.

Read Cal Thomas today. The global warming cult is being exposed as a money making farce every day.

Posted 341 days ago.

harryanderson

I certainly hope that’s true. I’d rather not be forced to radically change our way of life.

I looked at the Fox News article by McKelway. Unfortunately, it contained no link to the actual study, which, according to him, “was done under the auspices of the Heartland Institute.” McKelway doesn’t even state where the study was published.

The fact that the highly-political Heartland Institute apparently paid for the study makes me a little skeptical.

Nevertheless, one can hope that the direst predictions won’t happen. Unfortunately, some in the popular press have exaggerated the direst predictions, and this is just as harmful as those in the popular press who have claimed that climate science is a hoax.

Posted 348 days ago.

mythravere

Everyone does it to some degree. People like animals run in herds. And like animals few stray outside their chosen herd.

Posted 362 days ago.

harryanderson

I have been guilty of mistrusting others because of a group to which they belong.

Posted 362 days ago.

mythravere

A perfect example of that is in how Tiredofit dealt with Harry. Harry conveyed that he was a member of Tiredofits group. Since Harry has beliefs that Tiredofit takes issue with Tiredofit tired to finger Harry as a fraud etc.

Fear of going against the will of the group is what keeps people like Tiredofit in lockstep with the positions of the group he calls home.

It is not about what is right and wrong nor what the facts say.

Posted 362 days ago.

harryanderson

Prominent commenters on both sides of this debate have an anti-science bias.

Climate change skeptics say acceptors are irrational and acceptors say skeptics are irrational.

Dan Kahan of Yale Law School wrote in Nature:

“If anything, social science suggests that citizens are culturally polarized because they are, in fact, too rational — at filtering out information that would drive a wedge between themselves and their peers.”

“Positions on climate change have come to signify the kind of person one is. People whose beliefs are at odds with those of the people with whom they share their basic cultural commitments risk being labelled as weird and obnoxious in the eyes of those on whom they depend for social and financial support.”

ww w.nature.co m/news/why-we-are-poles-apart-on-climate-change-1.11166

In other words, peoples’ groups influence their opinions more than empirical evidence.

Posted 362 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

ust wondering what the latest imbecile idiocy the Globewarmers are spouting now.

LOL What a group if idiots.

Posted 363 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or