Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 hour ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

Odd facts unique to global warmists

1. Money only corrupts those who disagree with Algore

2. Cooling is evidence of warming

3. Extreme weather is a sign of global warming

4. Weather is not CLIMATE, unless it supports us.

5. The lack of severe weather is a sign of global warming

6. The lack of warming is a sign of warming.

Posted 2 days ago.

Tiredofit

You will not have this place to post your propaganda unchallenged.

Posted 2 days ago.

Tiredofit

If you had a single shred of proof you would present it.

Posted 2 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry your ego is astounding, based on past experience you will argue semantics to avoid proving any proof of your assertion. You are the type to misrepresent fact and when pinned down, You always play the victim and portray yourself as just too smart for the room.

Much like the 97% lie you continue to tell, there are no FACT s for you to offer. So sit back and enjoy selected reading from yours truly

Posted 2 days ago.

Tiredofit

And the media play along. For example, it somehow wasn’t front-page news that committed believers in man-made global warming recently admitted there’s been no surface global warming for well over a decade and maybe none for decades more. Nor did we see warmists conceding that their explanation is essentially a confession that the previous warming may not have been man-made at all. That admission came in a new paper by prominent warmists in the peer-reviewed journal Climate Dynamics. They not only conceded that average global surface temperatures stopped warming a full 15 years ago, but that this “pause” could extend into the 2030s.

Posted 2 days ago.

Tiredofit

Yet the evidence to the contrary was there all along. Back in 2005 I and others reviewed the entire hurricane record, which goes back over a century, and found no increase of any kind. Yes, we sometimes get bad storms — but no more frequently now than in the past. The advocates simply ignored that evidence — then repeated their false claims after Hurricane Sandy last year.

Posted 2 days ago.

Tiredofit

Warmist claims of a severe increase in hurricane activity go back to 2005 and Hurricane Katrina. The cover of Al Gore’s 2009 book, “Our Choice: A Plan to Solve the Climate Crisis,” even features a satellite image of the globe with four major hurricanes superimposed.

Posted 2 days ago.

Tiredofit

The 2013 hurricane season just ended as one of the five quietest years since 1960. But don’t expect anyone who pointed to last year’s hurricanes as “proof” of the need to act against global warming to apologize; the warmists don’t work that way.

Posted 2 days ago.

Tiredofit

Global-warming ‘proof’ is evaporating NyPost

Posted 2 days ago.

harryanderson

Based on past experience, I predict you’ll use the shotgun approach next.

My posts revealed the absurdity of your demands for proof, so you’ll bury my posts under a bunch of short posts and plagiarizing someone else.

Posted 2 days ago.

harryanderson

“Another ‘true believer’ without a shred of PROOF just itching to empower Government.”

There you go again.

By calling me a “true believer,” you are using an ad hominem argument (attacking an opponent rather than his or her position).

By claiming I’m “just itching to empower Government” (sic), you are using the straw man argument (misrepresenting an opponent’s position to discredit her or him).

I figured you’d go there. Again.

Posted 2 days ago.

Tiredofit

Another " true believer" without a shred of PROOF just itching to empower Government.

Posted 2 days ago.

Tiredofit

once again you fail to offer proof of your assertions. I am not surprised.

Posted 2 days ago.

harryanderson

“To be proven, something needs to be demonstrable and repeatable.”

That’s absurd. If that were true, we could never prove something that could only happen once. Suppose Clyde killed Moira. According to your definition, we couldn’t prove it because Moira could not be killed again. Sure, you could have Clyde kill Truman, but contrarians like you could always argue that it wasn’t the same because Truman isn’t Moira.

You’d better stick to the childish insults, Tiredofit. It’s the only way you can win. If you step into the field of rational discourse, you lose every time.

Posted 3 days ago.

harryanderson

Will you accept scientific evidence?

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

You have all evening to lay out your proof. Ill check back tomorrow.

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

A theory based on models is insufficient evidence

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

To be proven, something needs to be demonstrable and repeatable.

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

SO TELL ME HOW PROOF IN THE LAW IS APPLICABLE/?

Posted 3 days ago.

harryanderson

Will you accept the scientific evidence?

Posted 3 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or