Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
11 minutes ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

"Didn't see you chide your little buddy."

I don't remember him being a hypocrite like you. You said you were done with childish insults but continue to say them. Are you trying to make him behave in a manner that you won't? Bad form dear fellow.

"Anyway you are going with what scientists THINK now despite your reliance on peer reviewed lies."

Hmm, you have yet to show that any of the peer reviewed articles offered by Harry or others had any lies in them. Keep trying if you think you are correct.

Posted 147 days ago.

Kendall78

"Never said it did Kendall,"

It was in your post. Take responsibility for what you copy/paste or quit doing it.

Also, if you have a point to make...it is up to you to provide the evidence and not tell others to just read an article.

Try using your copy/paste powers and cite some information in a proper manner. It would do you some good.

Posted 147 days ago.

harryanderson

"You guys don't have a thing to prove your religion of global warming hysteria."

Statements like that have poisoned this debate.

I didn't pay much attention to global warming until I encountered folks like you who make these statements and call people who disagree with them names like Marxists, hoaxes, frauds, leftists, and the like.

So I started investigating, and I found the preponderance of scientific evidence is against you.

Just look at the emotionally-charged language you use. You who recently said you were "done with childish insults."

Posted 147 days ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit,

Please read the articles. They admit the surface temperatures aren't warming, and show where the heat may be going.

Posted 147 days ago.

harryanderson

I certainly hope Curry and others, like Lubos Motl, who doubt the ocean will warm enough to cause problems, are correct.

Motl wrote, "So I think that the ocean heat data are pretty cool, convincing, and show a rather uniformly increasing total heat. But the same data also seem to imply that the climate sensitivity is well below one Celsius degree per CO2 doubling."

htt p://motls.blogspot.c om/2013/09/ocean-heat-content-relentless-but.html

Posted 147 days ago.

harryanderson

Climate scientists think the super El Niño of 1997-1998 pumped a lot of heat out of the Pacific. The colder water is absorbing much more heat. Most scientists claim the heat will re-emerge. A few, like Judith Curry, admit the oceans are absorbing a lot of heat but question whether it will cause future problems.

For a good clear discussion of this see

w ww.nature.c om/news/climate-change-the-case-of-the-missing-heat-1.14525

Posted 147 days ago.

harryanderson

Right, Kendall. The US is a fraction of the world's land mass, and is not representative of the world.

Climate scientists have been looking for the missing heat. They focused in on three things, the sun's variability, reflective aerosols from Chinese industrialization, and the ocean.

Current thinking is that the Equatorial Pacific may be responsible for absorbing as much as 90% of the excess heat, which may explain why land surface temperatures have risen but little.

Posted 147 days ago.

Kendall78

"Government Data Show U.S. in Decade-Long Cooling"

Since when did US=Global?

Posted 147 days ago.

mythravere

And yes I did not read those posts you posted.

Now take issue with me doing that like a good widdle boy.

Oh wait you probably shouldn't since you are guilty of the same.

Tiredofit you are the tip of a feminine cleaning tool made by Massengill.

Posted 148 days ago.

mythravere

Breitbart London!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Are you serious?

You whine like a baby missing its mothers teat about leftwing media bias then you offer that up.

Oh god now I know you're just trolling.

Couldn't really be that stupid.

But then again.

Posted 148 days ago.

mythravere

Then whoooo boy we get to watch O'l shotgun Cheney try and make out like Obama is to blame for the broken country that is Iraq.

Now who was it that went after oil in Iraq?

Oh sorry WMD's.

That dang Obamaner. He went and fudged up the ultimate in strategery thinking in the most excellent war of epic Freedom Fighting that was that war.

Posted 148 days ago.

mythravere

" A Media Trackers Florida analysis shows PolitiFact Florida targets Republicans with 11 times more ?Pants on Fire? rulings than Democrats."

HA! LOL! Did you ever stop and think Tiredofit that it could just be that Republicans are way more likely to make false statements?

Truth be told there is a huge amount of BS peddled by the right that is flat out false.

I mean we see on almost a daily basis them saying something that gets them in trouble whether it be lies,sexist comments or racist comments.

Posted 148 days ago.

Kendall78

@Harry- I noticed that Tired hasn't answered your question about how it's bias. He hasn't even tried.

Posted 148 days ago.

harryanderson

You shouldn't get so worked up, Tiredofit. It's bad for the heart.

Posted 148 days ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit, you wrote: "Counter climate????? Lol. So there are people that have an alternative climate????? Or want the climate to stop?"

You know something, Tiredofit? If you took care to read what I wrote before you start mocking what I write, you wouldn't look so foolish.

I wrote: " Did you notice the well-known figure in the counter climate change movement to whom the article referred?" See the word "change"?

You say you "don't trust a thing they print." I don't wonder, if you can't read what they print any better than that.

Posted 148 days ago.

harryanderson

And did you note what that figure said about Goddard's claim that the data had been "fudged"?

Posted 148 days ago.

harryanderson

How is the article biased, Tiredofit. Did you notice the well-known figure in the counter climate change movement to whom the article referred?

Posted 148 days ago.

mythravere

Hilarious that he can see the bias in the lefts stuff but just can't seem to notice it in the media he consumes. Even with it being so blatant.

For the right its not a difference of opinion any more its straight up bias that drives their foolishness.

Heck they dont even see the left or others as fellow citizens but more enemy occupiers.

When someone has gone that route. There's no reasoning with them at all.

Posted 148 days ago.

Kendall78

"I read it and know that the bias is there"

Sounds like a classic case of truthiness.

Posted 149 days ago.

Politifact is, in reality, Tampa Bay Times politipinion. Yes, I invented a new word.

Posted 149 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or