Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
seconds ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

Co2 rising temps not. Hmmmm

Posted 5 days ago.

harryanderson

Stillhere posted that "the upper part of the world’s oceans continue to absorb heat from global warming."

"Continue" is the opposite of "pause."

Now, instead of explain going his inconsistency, we can expect stillhere to post a bunch of insults and copy/pastes.

She or he continues the tactics that got Tiredofit erased.

Posted 5 days ago.

Stillhere

I won't try to explain science to you MYTH clearly I won't accomplish what the school systems failed to. The science SHORT BUS HAS LEFT.

Posted 5 days ago.

Stillhere

Lolol you could have saved a lot of text by simply admitting YOU HAVE NO FREAKING CLUE.

Posted 5 days ago.

moderation

ithink- you are quite arrogant, and it takes away from your credibility.NASA-Goddard Institute for Space Studies(giss)(the people why want to ruin the world economy because they are bored)Read it yourself. Ice core samples are a wealth of ancient world climate records.Here is a good question for ya,ithink,how can you validate the existence of the ice age(s) you referenced? And, there were more than only one.

Posted 5 days ago.

mythravere

If you were concerned about this issue then you would have gladly answered a really simple question.

If man is not the cause of climate change in our modern times then what natural processes are responsible for the phenomenon that we see that points to a warming planet.

Thats so freaking simple. Especially operating under the assumption that you are correct in your assertions and man is not responsible. Which means that you have the truth in your corner.

You could explain this. Yet you do not.

Why? Well for one thing. You're not honest enough to admit when you are wrong about something. Your silence and refusal to answer basic questions like that insulate you from any sort of criticism. And secondly I think you are more interested in the drama of arguing than actually debating.

Posted 6 days ago.

mythravere

Here's the truth though. At least in regards to me anyways.

I'm not going to bother explaining anything to you.

Why?

Because you will never admit we are right about anything. Showing you that we are right is an exercise in futility.

And thats because this is a political crusade for you. You are more concerned about "fighting" people you perceive to be socialists than actually debating the facts surrounding climate change and man's role in it.

In fact that is why you will always say we are wrong not matter how right we are.

Posted 6 days ago.

mythravere

LOL! Tiredofit you shouldn't be asking people why they won't answer questions when you are just as guilty of not answering questions yourself.

We've sent plenty your way that you refuse to answer.

Posted 6 days ago.

mythravere

Here you go.

Giant CO2 ‘burp’ triggered end of last ice age - but it was 100 times SLOWER than man-made climate change, claim scientists

Posted 6 days ago.

Stillhere

Why can you NOT explain NO WARMING in 18 years and WHY can you not answer her question about GLACIERS???? hmmmmm

Posted 6 days ago.

Stillhere

ITHINK is correct again. IF a month is warm or cold its WEATHER not climate according to the warmers unless it serves their purpose. LOL

Posted 6 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The tiredbrain troll doesn't like inconvenient facts !

Posted 6 days ago.

It is not clear from my post, sorry, but I was replying to moderation about Sept temps.

Good research, Stillhere.

Posted 6 days ago.

Stillhere

Happy Anniversary: 1 October Marks 18 Years Without Global Warming Trend

Posted 6 days ago.

Ohwiseone

What is their motive tiredbrain ??

Posted 6 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Here we go , back on track to 400+ pages with the tiredbrain troll ! You set such trust in NASA and yet according to you , you cant believe them because their funded by the government !!! The tiredbrain troll doesn't like inconvenient facts ! Well,,,,,, we are still waiting !!And face facts , the tiredbrain troll JUST DOES'NT KNOW !

Posted 6 days ago.

Stillhere

•The IPCC’s prediction of 3.7 Cº warming by 2100 is more than twice the greatest rate of warming lasting more than ten years that has been measured since 1950. •The IPCC’s 3.7 Cº-by-2100 prediction is more than three times the observed real-world warming trend since we might in theory have begun influencing it in 1950. •Since 1 January 2001, the dawn of the new millennium, the warming trend on the dataset of five major datasets is zero – 0.0 Cº per century. No warming for 13 years 3 months. •Recent extreme weather cannot be blamed on global warming, because there has not been any global warming. It is as simple as that.

Posted 6 days ago.

Stillhere

•In 1990, the IPCC’s mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was equivalent to 3.5 Cº per century. •The global warming trend since 1990, when the IPCC wrote its first report, is equivalent to 1.4 Cº per century – two-fifths of what the IPCC had then predicted. •In 2013 the IPCC’s new mid-range prediction of the near-term warming trend was for warming at a rate equivalent to 1.7 Cº per century – just half its 1990 prediction. •Though the IPCC has cut its near-term warming prediction, it has not cut its centennial warming prediction of 3.7 Cº warming to 2100 on business as usual. •The IPCC’s prediction of 3.7 Cº warming by 2100 is more than twice the greatest rate of warming lasting more than ten years that has been measured since 1950.

Posted 6 days ago.

Stillhere

•The RSS satellite dataset shows no global warming at all for 213 months from August 1996 to April 2014. That is more than half the entire 423-month satellite record. •The fastest centennial warming rate was in Central England from 1663-1762, at 0.9 Cº per century – before the industrial revolution began. It cannot have been our fault. •The global warming trend since 1900 is equivalent to 0.8 Cº per century. This is well within natural variability and may not have much to do with us. •The fastest warming trend lasting ten years or more occurred over the 40 years from 1694-1733 in Central England. It was equivalent to 4.3 Cº per century. •Since 1950, when a human influence on global temperature first became theoretically possible, the global warming trend is equivalent to 1.2 Cº per century. •The fastest warming rate lasting ten years or more since 1950 occurred over the 33 years from 1974 to 2006. It was equivalent to 2.0 Cº per century.

Posted 6 days ago.

You all call that weather, not climate, right?

What kind of instruments did they measure with in prehistoric times? Cartoon time, kids.

Posted 6 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or