Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
8 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

Why the Climate Movement Must Stand with Ferguson By Deirdre Smith, Strategic Partnership Coordinator

It was not hard for me to make the connection between the tragedy in Ferguson, Missouri, and the catalyst for my work to stop the climate crisis. LOLOL. YOU CANNOT MAKE THIS STUFF UP

Posted 7 days ago.

Kendall78

Aww...diddums get mad? It's ok if you got cranky. Sleep it off ;)

Posted 8 days ago.

Tiredofit

********off the morons JUST A BONUS

Posted 8 days ago.

Kendall78

Very good Tired...you understand what "Bandwagon" means.

You are such a good little reader...oh yes you are. Good boy.

Posted 8 days ago.

Tiredofit

Inevitable victory: invites those not already on the bandwagon to join those already on the road to certain victory. Those already or at least partially on the bandwagon are reassured that staying aboard is their best course of action. (e.g., “The debate is over. 97% of scientist

OF ALL THE EXAMPLES THEY COULD HAVE CHOSEN FOR EXAMPLES OF PROPGANDA THEY CHOSE THOSE TWO LOLOLOLOLOL EVEN WIKI GETS IT.

Posted 8 days ago.

Kendall78

And this disproves that man effects the global climate how?

If your intent was to show bandwagon mentality, might I suggest you research how deniers use the bandwagon style. They tend to use people's ignorance as a catalyst to get their bandwagon moving.

Posted 8 days ago.

Tiredofit

But you nailed it

Posted 8 days ago.

Tiredofit

Congrats Wiki, butbi bet the free speech socialists on the left will have your "evil denier mouth breathing knuckle dragging Koch funded dirty oil reference removed soon.

Posted 8 days ago.

Kendall78

And this disproves that man effects the global climate how?

Posted 8 days ago.

Tiredofit

Well, it turns out the “97% of all scientists agree” meme is being used as an example on the Wikipedia Propaganda Techniques page:

Bandwagon

Bandwagon and “inevitable-victory” appeals attempt to persuade the target audience to join in and take the course of action that “everyone else is taking.”

Inevitable victory: invites those not already on the bandwagon to join those already on the road to certain victory. Those already or at least partially on the bandwagon are reassured that staying aboard is their best course of action. (e.g., “The debate is over. 97% of scientist agree”)”.

Lol wiki gets it right.

Posted 8 days ago.

mythravere

Coal was on the decline before this push to reduce emissions was even thought of.

Know why?

There is only so much of it that can be mined. Simple as that.

Imagine the shock and outrage these war on coal acolytes would have had when one of the coal industry's biggest customers moved in mass away from coal use had they been around when it happened.

That industry would have been the railroads. Faced with an all around easier to use and more economical fuel the railroads abandoned steam power very quickly. Not all steam engines were powered by coal. Some were oil fired. And the maintenance on a steam locomotive was far more intensive.

But market forces caused the movement away from steam power for locomotives.

Market forces will also cause the movement away from coal to cheaper and more economical gas or even nuclear. Its happening right now.

Posted 33 days ago.

harryanderson

Here's the absurd argument Tiredofit wants us to accept: The world's largest oil companies "play ball" with the so-called global warming hoax.

I'm laughing so hard I can barely type.

Posted 33 days ago.

harryanderson

We all need to realize what this says. Despite the loud screams about a war on coal, the coal industry, and Central Appalachian coal in particular, is doomed by freemarket forces.

Posted 33 days ago.

harryanderson

Thanks for posting that opinion piece, Tiredofit. It makes a very important point we need to consider.

The author writes, "And coal? Here’s where the global warming regulatory crowd at EPA are doing all they can to help the Big Oil & Gas guys, whether they asked for it or not. Then again, the EPA probably isn’t the coal industry’s biggest problem anyway, and is only hastening its inevitable decline. A greater adversary resides in the free market form of that cheaper, cleaner and abundant natural gas."

Notice what it says: It says the EPA's main way of aiding the Oil and Gas industry is by its so-called war on coal. However, coal is in "inevitable decline" even without EPA regulations.

Posted 33 days ago.

Tiredofit

How Big Oil Benefits From Global Warming AlarmismFORBES

When the govt can use the EPA like a weapon, of course the companies play ball,

Posted 33 days ago.

harryanderson

There's four to draw to! They know what's happening.

And they've been pulling their funding from the Counter Climate Change Movement.

"Meanwhile the traceable cash flow from more traditional sources, such as Koch Industries and ExxonMobil, has disappeared."

ww w.scientificamerican.co m/article/dark-money-funds-climate-change-denial-effort/

Posted 33 days ago.

harryanderson

Shell says, "CO2 emissions must be reduced to avoid serious climate change."

ww w.shell.co m/global/environment-society/environment/climate-change.html

BP says the latest IPCC report "makes clear that limiting climate change will require substantial and sustained reductions of GHG emissions."

"The scale of this challenge is such that governments must act by setting a clear, stable and effective carbon policy framework."

ww w.bp.co m/en/global/corporate/sustainability/the-energy-future/climate-change.html

Exxon-Mobile, Chevron, Shell, and BP have all investigated the science and agree that we need to mitigate the risks.

Posted 33 days ago.

harryanderson

Some of the world's largest fossil fuel companies also recognize that GJG emissions are changing the climate.

"ExxonMobil believes that it is prudent to develop and implement strategies that address the risks to society associated with increasing GHG emissions."

h ttp://corporate.exxonmobil.c om/en/environment/climate-change/climate-policy

"At Chevron, we recognize and share the concerns of governments and the public about climate change. The use of fossil fuels to meet the world's energy needs is a contributor to an increase in greenhouse gases (GHGs)—mainly carbon dioxide (CO2 )—in the Earth's atmosphere."

w ww.chevron.c om/globalissues/climatechange/

Posted 33 days ago.

Kendall78

Here's the link if you are interested: ww w.ipsosglobaltrends.c om/environment.h tm l

Posted 36 days ago.

Kendall78

5. 54% of Americans believe that, "the climate change we are currently seeing is largely the result of human activity."

32% do not agree that man is not involved.

Isn't that strange? If 52% of Americans believe that global warming is a natural event..shouldn't those that disagree that man is involved be much higher than 32%?

That's the thing about surveys..it tells you what the general population thinks....not what reality is.

Posted 36 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or