Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 days ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

Report: 95 percent of global warming models are wrong ...

dailycaller****/2014/...95-percent-of-global-warming-models-are-wrong

Feb 11, 2014 · Climate scientists have been baffled by the 17-year pause in global warming. At least eight explanations have been offered to explain the lapse in warming ...

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

Take a look at your buddies here, that's the company you are in.

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

Now you two are talking about what most scientists think about where the missing heat went. LOLOLOLOLOL Is this peer reviewed? Nevemind I guess peer reviewed didn't exactly turn out to be synonymous with TRUE. LOL

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

Kendall, when I want your input on how I should post here, I will be sure to ask. Otherwise I really couldn't give to reasonable sized rats behinds what you think, got it. LOL

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry, sorry if your feelings are hurt, I call em like I see em. Just an observation, not a childish insult. You DO come off as a self righteous jerk and YOU DO call people who don't agree, deniers and anti science oh and your new one, counter climate

Posted 32 days ago.

Kendall78

"Ever notice the anger when it all comes unraveled"

Yes, you start treating the comment board like a twitter page when you are being shown to be incorrect in your assumptions.

Reasonable suggestions are offered to you about citation of information and how you could present your point better or even how you are wrong. But you go into denial mode and get all frustrated.

Posted 32 days ago.

harryanderson

Again you revert to your default tactic--the childish insult you recently said you were "done with."

Posted 32 days ago.

Kendall78

"Didn't see you chide your little buddy."

I don't remember him being a hypocrite like you. You said you were done with childish insults but continue to say them. Are you trying to make him behave in a manner that you won't? Bad form dear fellow.

"Anyway you are going with what scientists THINK now despite your reliance on peer reviewed lies."

Hmm, you have yet to show that any of the peer reviewed articles offered by Harry or others had any lies in them. Keep trying if you think you are correct.

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

Ever notice the anger when it all comes unraveled

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

And I didn't care much about it either until I met folks like you Harry, self righteous jerks that call people who have doubts deniers and anti science. So right back at you.

Posted 32 days ago.

Kendall78

"Never said it did Kendall,"

It was in your post. Take responsibility for what you copy/paste or quit doing it.

Also, if you have a point to make...it is up to you to provide the evidence and not tell others to just read an article.

Try using your copy/paste powers and cite some information in a proper manner. It would do you some good.

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

Well I didn't call you a feminine hygine product. Didn't see you chide your little buddy. Anyway you are going with what scientists THINK now despite your reliance on peer reviewed lies. Lol

Posted 32 days ago.

harryanderson

"You guys don't have a thing to prove your religion of global warming hysteria."

Statements like that have poisoned this debate.

I didn't pay much attention to global warming until I encountered folks like you who make these statements and call people who disagree with them names like Marxists, hoaxes, frauds, leftists, and the like.

So I started investigating, and I found the preponderance of scientific evidence is against you.

Just look at the emotionally-charged language you use. You who recently said you were "done with childish insults."

Posted 32 days ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit,

Please read the articles. They admit the surface temperatures aren't warming, and show where the heat may be going.

Posted 32 days ago.

harryanderson

I certainly hope Curry and others, like Lubos Motl, who doubt the ocean will warm enough to cause problems, are correct.

Motl wrote, "So I think that the ocean heat data are pretty cool, convincing, and show a rather uniformly increasing total heat. But the same data also seem to imply that the climate sensitivity is well below one Celsius degree per CO2 doubling."

htt p://motls.blogspot.c om/2013/09/ocean-heat-content-relentless-but.html

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

You guys don't have a thing to prove your religion of global warming hysteria.

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

Now they THINK???????/ WHERE IS THE DATA, WE go with what they THINK?????/?? LOLLO

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

You guys will cling to this horse hockey to the last . It's amazing to watch change with each revelation.

Posted 32 days ago.

Tiredofit

So now you are finally admitting there has been no warming, lol. It's about time.

Posted 32 days ago.

harryanderson

Climate scientists think the super El Niño of 1997-1998 pumped a lot of heat out of the Pacific. The colder water is absorbing much more heat. Most scientists claim the heat will re-emerge. A few, like Judith Curry, admit the oceans are absorbing a lot of heat but question whether it will cause future problems.

For a good clear discussion of this see

w ww.nature.c om/news/climate-change-the-case-of-the-missing-heat-1.14525

Posted 32 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or