Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
4 days ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

Delightful study there. Dino *****, really.

Posted 346 days ago.

Tiredofit

Christian Science Monitor

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Did gassy dinosaurs cause global warming?

A new study found that giant plant-eating dinosaurs could have produced giant quantities of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas.

By Amina Khan, Los Angeles Times / May 8, 2012

Posted 346 days ago.

mythravere

Where do the deniers get their funding from? Hmmmm?

Posted 346 days ago.

Tiredofit

Have you done any research into WHO is funding the science. How much money is being made by supposed carbon offsets and carbon trading. AL GORE AGAIN. No you just listen to the leftist media and YES there is and has been a socialist movement here, its just now getting traction in this country thanks to the sheep

Posted 346 days ago.

mythravere

I forgot to mention documentaries on climate changes. Like Chasing Ice. But that will be shot down by you. Because....soccccciallistssssssss!!!!!!

Posted 346 days ago.

mythravere

A palin moment. No. What did I do wrong. LOL!

Posted 346 days ago.

mythravere

My favorite ones are National Geographic. Discover Magazine. LiveScience. I also follow stories in the news back to their sources and read that. Oh and Popular Science.

One of the big deciding factors for me though is this. Even without climate change would it not be better to shift ourselves away from finite resources onto more renewable ones. There are only so much carbon based resources left. Lets use it more efficiently and find alternatives that are open participants in the carbon cycle of this world.

Posted 346 days ago.

Tiredofit

I think Myth just had his Sarah Palin moment

Posted 346 days ago.

mythravere

So you tout someone who is funded by the Heartland Institute.

Awesome.

Posted 346 days ago.

Tiredofit

TRUSTED SOURCES??? which ones> that's pretty vague.

Posted 346 days ago.

mythravere

I am open to debate. I go where the facts go. I can acknowledge when I am wrong.

You on the other hand are totally closed up on the issue.

You have your position and thats the end of it.

Posted 346 days ago.

Tiredofit

by Joanne Nova Science and Public Policy Institute

Posted 346 days ago.

Tiredofit

“Thousands of scientists have been funded to find a connection between human carbon emissions and the climate. Hardly any have been funded to find the opposite. Throw 30 billion dollars at one question and how could bright, dedicated people not find 800 pages worth of connections, links, predictions, projections and scenarios? (What’s amazing is what they haven’t found: empirical evidence.)”

Posted 346 days ago.

mythravere

Its something called reading. Its something called trusting the sources I look at. Its this thing called discernment.

Like I have said before I used to rail against climate change and mans hand in it. I used the same exact arguments you used. But then I decided to take a totally unbiased look at it. And you know what there is a strong case for it.

Posted 346 days ago.

mythravere

So at what point did only one party tell everyone how to live the lives. I was under the assumption that both parties do that has almost a hobby.

And no you are right I can't tell you what to chime in on. In fact I never thought I could. Its just that why bother if your mind is already made up? To you there isn't any debate. Heck you even stated that you aren't out to change anyones mind.

So....why bother?

Posted 346 days ago.

Tiredofit

And this evidence you speak of, by what method do you obtain this information>???? are you taking readings yourself or are you relying on someone else to TELL you what the data is????? The media has no political bias???

Posted 346 days ago.

mythravere

Politics aren't informing me of anything. The science is. The accounts worldwide of ecological and environmental changes taking place are informing me.

Posted 346 days ago.

Tiredofit

you don't have the authority to tell me when or where I cannot chime in. I suppose you take yourself seriously enough to think you can but sorry bub.

Posted 346 days ago.

Tiredofit

if you think politics are not informing you, you are a bigger fool that I thought.

Posted 346 days ago.

mythravere

Do us all a favor don't bother chiming in on this issue anymore. You aren't flexible in your thinking which correlates with dishonesty in my opinion.

Clarification

Posted 346 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or