Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
17 hours ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

"Its not for me to prove man DOESNT cause global warming"

I never asked you to prove man doesn't do anything. You have proven that man does effect global warming thanks to your whole ozone commentary though. Thanks ;)

"its up to you to make the case"

You already shown that man effects global warming by showing that man effects the Ozone Layer that controls how the Earth absorbs heat. Lol.

What I have asked you to do is to prove what you do believe in, that something other than man is causing global warming.

It's easy for you to say what's not doing it but you seem like a bit of an imbecile when you won't say what is causing it.

Posted 88 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Just watch and see, NO FACTS FROM TIREDBRAIN EITHER !

Posted 88 days ago.

Kendall78

Yeah Tired...everyone can see that you offer up no facts. It's part of who you are.

Posted 88 days ago.

Kendall78

"when they are using 50 to 100 years of data."

Curious how many years of data one needs to make a scientific statement?

Does this mean that no scientific fact is really a fact to you since there isn't thousands of years of data gathering?

"where did the mile thick glaciers across Ohio go?"

What glaciers? Are you using a paltry 50 to 100 years of data to come to a conclusion Tired?

Posted 88 days ago.

Kendall78

"I have read it all."

Liar. Not an insult or name calling but a fact.

Posted 88 days ago.

JoeBlow

I find it strange that they can call this scientific fact when they are using 50 to 100 years of data. What percentage is that if you take into consideration the earth is approx 4.54 billion years old?

Posted 88 days ago.

Kendall78

And please don't cower away from reading the proof...it's all right there for you. ;)

Posted 88 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired, I refer you to the past 200 pages of comments of this thread. You will find all the citation you ever need.

Heck, you have seen them already multiple times. Perhaps you will actually read them this time.

Of course you could try the novel approach of proving your position with concrete evidence.

Posted 88 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Exactly !

Posted 88 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit you are completely biased against this issue.

The facts don't really matter. Its the political aspect of it that is the deciding factor for you that forms the opinion you put forth on here.

Mans role in climate change is looked at as being a Democrat/left wing issue. You are strictly aligned against anything Democratic and or leftwing. Therefor being that the climate change issue is viewed by you as coming from the left...you say its all a hoax etc ad nauseum.

Nothing can be proven to someone who's mind is already made up.

Posted 88 days ago.

mythravere

Why do you want the facts? You'll just deny everything and anything put on the table.

Just like you have already done before..time and again.

Posted 88 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Look at me ! I'm tiredbrain! and I know everything there is to know but I still bury my head up my rump !Everything that research has shown is garbage because Faux says its so !What a tool !

Posted 88 days ago.

Kendall78

"Standard lefty reply climate isn't weather, yet they point to a hurricane as PROOF despite there are record lows in extreme weather."

1. I'm not a "lefty"

2. Climate and weather are not the same thing. Sorry facts get in the way of your fantasy.

3. I never used hurricanes as proof of climate change.

Care to try again Tired?

Posted 88 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired...weather is not climate.

Learn your terminoligy.

Posted 88 days ago.

Kendall78

"Was there any fluctuation in the earths temperature before man?"

Of course there was...what's your point?

Did someone on here say that there wasn't?

Posted 88 days ago.

Ohwiseone

There have been fluctuations in our climate but not to the extreme we are starting to see ! Continuing to deny the fact that we are seeing things in our weather we have never seen before is ludicrous !Only when Faux says its changing will some of these mushrooms admit they were wrong !

Posted 88 days ago.

Ohwiseone

“Blind belief in Faux is the greatest enemy of truth.” ?

Posted 88 days ago.

JoeBlow

A question for all of you. Was there any fluctuation in the earths temperature before man?

Posted 88 days ago.

Kendall78

See folks, when one takes this clown Tired to task, you find he doesn't really have a clue. He wants to very much to believe, so like religion it's based on faith alone.

People have given him tons of data and evidence in the pages past but ignored it. Now he wants it spoon fed to him again just so he can have another spitup.

Posted 88 days ago.

Man causing climate change is when man spits in the ocean and causes a flood. Run for the hills.

Posted 88 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or