Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
93 days ago.
by slinky
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

If someone states what causes "global warming", Kendall, it needs to be labeled fiction.

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

Only one person running from questions here Tired...and that would be you.

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

@Tired, you must have missed it because you are focusing on "knob polishing": So what would happen if the dominant species of a planet would take fossil fuels, burn them for energy consumption and that burning adds more carbon to the atmosphere than the carbon cycle can deal with?

Take a few minutes, you might just yet figure it out. You do understand the carbon cycle yes?

Posted 670 days ago.

mythravere

I haven't slinked off nowhere. Just got lost in a rather gory film.

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

@Tired, you must have missed it: So what would happen if the dominant species of a planet would take fossil fuels, burn them for energy consumption and that burning adds more carbon to the atmosphere than the carbon cycle can deal with?

Take a few minutes, you might just yet figure it out. You do understand the carbon cycle yes?

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

I guess I'm worth the bandwidth after all...haha.

Curious, do you not see yourself as a keyboard hero? After all, this is the only battlefield you ever fought on. I simply offer you a more direct chance to voice your opinions on global warming and you cower from it. Can't say I am surprise by your actions.

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

I already know you won't come Tired, so I wish to you a blissful evening in the security of your own ignorance.

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

"but calling a person a coward in text is hardly the act of a man"

Would you rather I called it to your face? If you wish, come down to Buffalo Wild Wings around 10:30 tonight. I'll buy you a beer if you are old enough.

Maybe then you will answer the questions I've asked.

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

"You are not worth my bandwidth"

Translation: You are too cowardly and/or ignorant to answer.

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

@Tired, you must have missed it: So what would happen if the dominant species of a planet would take fossil fuels, burn them for energy consumption and that burning adds more carbon to the atmosphere than the carbon cycle can deal with?

Take a few minutes, you might just yet figure it out. You do understand the carbon cycle yes?

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

"I am still waiting for one prediction that came to fruition that can be proven to be as result of co2"

Predicting the future does not make something true. If that was the case, you should be able to predict the future of climate studies because you have access to the political makeup of the nation.

So go ahead Tired, predict what the climate is going to be by politics. If what you imply is true about politics directing the information on climate change, this should be easy for you.

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

All I see from you Tired is a bunch of denial and cowardness. It's always easy to say what isn't, after all...you do that everyday you are on here.

But you never have the nerve or bravery to state what is causing global warming. Of course you will parrot more about the temp not rising in the last 17 years but then like a coward you ignore that the last 17 years have been more hot then the 17 years that came before it.

So, if not due to mankind...can you PROVE there is another factor to explain where the increased heat came from?

Please do not embarrass yourself by deflecting. Either you can or you cannot.

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

"they are moronic"

I only use examples that suit the person they are aimed at.

Posted 670 days ago.

mythravere

You do that sport! LOL! What knob polisher!

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

"I am still waiting for one prediction that came to fruition that can be proven to be as result of co2"

Predicting the future does not make something true. If that was the case, you should be able to predict the future of climate studies because you have access to the political makeup of the nation.

So go ahead Tired, predict what the climate is going to be by politics. If what you imply is true about politics directing the information on climate change, this should be easy for you.

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

@Tired, you must have missed it: So what would happen if the dominant species of a planet would take fossil fuels, burn them for energy consumption and that burning adds more carbon to the atmosphere than the carbon cycle can deal with?

Take a few minutes, you might just yet figure it out. You do understand the carbon cycle yes?

Posted 670 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit is the perfect example of someone with selective thinking.

Not to mention having a very high degree of confirmation bias and attitude polarization and belief perseverance.

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

"Only someone like you tiredofit would think Kendall was talking about a car heating up a garage and killing a person."

Thank you myth, pity it will just fly over his head.

Posted 670 days ago.

Kendall78

"You fail to grasp the fact that it's the CO that displaces oxygen just like nitrogen and kills a person."

And the end result is the same, the burning of fossil fuel can kill you.

Posted 670 days ago.

mythravere

I think the whole point around Kendall mentioning a car in a closed garage is that the carbon monoxide from the exhaust which comes from the burning of hydrocarbons would kill a person.

Only someone like you tiredofit would think Kendall was talking about a car heating up a garage and killing a person.

But then again you do like to deflect a lot.

Posted 670 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or