Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 hour ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

I found a video making statements of having proof that airlines were spray chemicals.

In the video the person pointed to a part of an airplane as being the apparatus for the spraying.

Well I did some digging and found out that the part in question was a wing flap hinge fairing.

I posted a comment stating what it really was.

The youtube channel cowardly had the comments set up for moderation prior to posting. So I had to wait for it to be posted.

It never was posted. So that tells me that they like you can't stand any contradictory details that goes against the position they hold on the issue at hand.

A truthful fact was rejected.

To put the cherry on top they banned me from trying to make comments on their channel every again.

Heaven forbid anything would cause them to question their own beliefs.

They like you live in their own little self confirming world.

Posted 194 days ago.

mythravere

I got a funny story about dealing with a conspiracy nut on Youtube that though short and sweet it pretty much describes your type.

Because you are straight up in the same group as the conspiracy loons.

Posted 194 days ago.

mythravere

LOL! Typical cowardly deflection.

No where did I say that I believed in Chemtrails. You stating that is just another point showing your dishonesty.

Posted 194 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit do want to see what its like to argue with yourself?

Here's what you do.

Get a Youtube account or go onto forums etc where Chemtrails are mentioned.

Research what they are talking about. Misidentifying components of airliners as being used for spraying chemicals and be sure to mention the "chemtrails" are actually contrails from the hot exhaust mixing with cold air etc.

You will see rather quickly that you can not rationalize with them and the whirlwind that is their circuitous logic is nigh impenetrable.

Doing that will be like looking in the mirror!

Posted 195 days ago.

Kendall78

Ah, I see you are referencing your 1980's roots again.

Posted 195 days ago.

Kendall78

Poor Tired, have you utterly gave up on having mature conversations?

You can't back up barely anything you talk about on here and you don't have the good sense to learn to keep quite around your superiors.

Posted 195 days ago.

Kendall78

"shall we talk about your rejection of scientific fact"

The topic is about Global Warming, I don't recall Harry rejecting any science involving it.

Tired, do you have proof that Harry has rejected science involving global warming? Think slowly on this since the topic is global warming. Bait and switches don not apply here.

Posted 195 days ago.

Kendall78

How shocking, another ad hominem attack by Tired.

Instead of showing that the info from UCS is incorrect for Harry, he attacks Harry.

Posted 195 days ago.

harryanderson

You're going after the messenger and ignoring the message. That's called an ad hominem attack.

You demonstrate, Tiredofit, that you're unable to refute the UCS's study or methodology.

Posted 195 days ago.

Kendall78

Isn't a sad that in our nation people will spout off "Conservative" or "Liberal" as if they were insults?

The news media is especially bad about doing that anymore.

Posted 195 days ago.

RANDOM21

The UCS is regularly criticized by conservative, libertarian and right-wing groups for being "left-wing" and "liberal". David Martosko of ActivistCash**** asserts that the organization harbors a "pro-regulation, anti-business" agenda. The UCS has also been criticized by inidividuals who reject the theory of global warming. Wiki. No bias from any of those concerned scientists. Right.

Posted 195 days ago.

Kendall78

"chucky cheese"?

Lol...sounds like someone is a child of the 80's.

Posted 195 days ago.

Kendall78

Wow...are you always this full of yourself? What an ego.

Tired, Exactly what do you want more? Factual information or the journalistic version of panem et circenses?

Of course the unwashed masses likes the entertainment news that has a lot of yelling and flashes of women's legs than borning ol facts. Doesn't mean they are more intelligent or up to speed on what is important in the world.

Posted 195 days ago.

Kendall78

"MSNBC's far-Left bias isn't working out so well"

Exactly what do you want more? Factual information or the journalistic version of panem et circenses?

Of course the unwashed masses likes the entertainment news that has a lot of yelling and flashes of women's legs than borning ol facts. Doesn't mean they are more intelligent or up to speed on what is important in the world.

Posted 195 days ago.

mythravere

People like Tiredofit can never be convinced of the truth.

Even if they know that what you are saying is true...they will deny it.

Posted 195 days ago.

mythravere

The only reason they take issue with man made climate change is because of political reasons.

The reason they find it wrong is because its something put on the table by the left. And that is the only thing they need to know to say that it is false,lie,a fraud or whatever.

The facts surrounding the issue are meaningless. Because no matter how much you try to show them the truth...no matter how many facts of theirs are refuted...everything you say is a lie and the facts about the issue that support its truthfulness are false.

Posted 195 days ago.

harryanderson

I suspect some here won’t accept the evidence that we have presented because they receive only information from sources who mislead them. A recent study from the Union of Concerned Scientists analyzed cable news networks’ climate change stories for evidence of misinformation. They found:

CNN was accurate 2/3 of the time.

Fox News was only accurate 28% of the time, with half of the misinformation coming from a single show—The Five.

MSNBC was the most accurate at 92%, “with some overstatements.”

htt p://****ucsusa.or g/global_warming/solutions/fight-misinformation/cable-news-coverage-climate-change-science.html

Posted 195 days ago.

mythravere

LOL! Tiredofit you know what it means.

Posted 195 days ago.

Kendall78

Why Ithink? Are you saying that global warming is happening but there is no one that knows why?

Posted 196 days ago.

If someone states what causes "global warming", Kendall, it needs to be labeled fiction.

Posted 196 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or