Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
10 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

"Gingers do tend to be emotional, like women."

Wow..mixing racism and misogyny all in one sentence.

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

"Youre just wrong on the facts.."

In what way? You have yet to show how the facts are wrong.

Please try to show how they are wrong.

Posted 53 days ago.

Tiredofit

Boom

Posted 53 days ago.

Tiredofit

NOAA YES LETS SEE WHAT THE HEAD OF THE CLIMATE PROJECT HAS TO SAY.MS It is no secret that a lot of climate-change research is subject to opinion, that climate models sometimes disagree even on the signs of the future changes (e.g. drier vs. wetter future climate). The problem is, only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians' - and readers' - attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today's world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty.

Posted 53 days ago.

Tiredofit

No warming, none nadda zip, zero.

Posted 53 days ago.

Tiredofit

Gingers do tend to be emotional, like women.

Posted 53 days ago.

Tiredofit

Youre just wrong on the facts, but don't let that bother you, no one paying attention to a thing you post anyway. No harm done.

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

"NOAA Confirms Model-Defying..."

How about you give us some NOAA citation for this statement of yours Tired. But since we know you won't..here is some stuff from NOAA's people:

"Since 1976, every year including 2012 has had an annual temperature above the long-term average. Including the 2012 temperature, the rate of warming is 0.06°C (0.11°F) per decade since 1880 and a more rapid 0.16°C (0.28°F) per decade since 1970, according to the 2012 annual report from NOAA's National Climatic Data Center."

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

"It's personal to you if someone doesn't believe the same things."

No, it's just offensive to rational people when others spew random factless statements around and want to be taken seriously. Take the hint.

Posted 53 days ago.

Tiredofit

Wow, you guys are really invested in this. It's personal to you if someone doesn't believe the same things.

Posted 53 days ago.

Tiredofit

NOAA Confirms Model-Defying Global Temperature Stagnation…2012 Was Among Coolest In 21st Century By P Gosselin on 7. August 2013 The political beauty about climate data is that it can be easily manipulated in order to fool the public.

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

Let's play Tired's game shall we..

"Since I am primarily a data guy, I’ll confine my comments here to discussing recent climate trends but note that the global climate has warmed...and it will likely continue to warm for another 200-300 years" (S. Fred Singer)

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

"No warming in this century????"

Explain that please. Has the last 14 years been warmer on average than 1900-1914?

Yes or No

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired....do you even realize that all you posted is some credentials about a man and NOTHING that throws doubt into mna made global warming?

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

"I would guess it is about 40% now"

Guessing? Yes..that is scientific Tired. HAHA.

Posted 53 days ago.

Tiredofit

Well said.

Posted 53 days ago.

Tiredofit

Asked what he would like to see happen in regard to public opinion and policy on climate change, Singer replied, I would like to see the public look upon global warming as just another scientific controversy and oppose any public policies until the major issues are settled, such as the cause. If mostly natural, as NIPCC concludes, then the public policies currently discussed are pointless, hugely expensive, and wasteful of resources that could better be applied to real societal problems.

Posted 53 days ago.

Tiredofit

PRINCETON, NJ (January 3, 2011)—S. Fred Singer said in an interview with the National Association of Scholars (NAS) that “the number of skeptical qualified scientists has been growing steadily; I would guess it is about 40% now.” Singer, a leading scientific skeptic of anthropocentric global warming (AGW), is an atmospheric physicist, and founder of the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP), an organization that began challenging the published findings of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the 1990s. SEPP established the Leipzig Declaration, a statement of dissent from the 1997 Kyoto Protocol that has been signed by over one hundred scientists and meteorologists.

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

"So-called global-warming alarmists are in a frenzy after the latest climate data confirmed the Earth actually appears to be entering a potential cooling trend, sea-ice cover in Antarctica.."

Will you at least have the balls to cite your sources because everyone on here knows you are not clever enough of a writer to come up with this on your own.

Posted 53 days ago.

Kendall78

"Environment: The United Nations on Friday released its climate change report, which says that scientists are 95% sure that man is causing Earth to warm. Well, we're 100% sure this finding deserves a heaping dose of ridicule."

Tired, how much ridicule does the 5% that don't think global warming is manmade deserves? Surely they deserve even more yes? Maybe a huge heaping dose?

Posted 53 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or