Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 hours ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

your insisting means less than nothing to me

Posted 6 days ago.

Kendall78

"Well, I continue to wait for the proof."

I do too except the difference between you and me is that I have offered proof and you ignore it and you offer no proof so I can't ever see what your point really is.

"Even the much debunked IPCC report"

Debunked how? Did something in all that debunking somehow make the Earth cool down?

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

IT IS a trace gas. Much more methane and water are in the air and they too can trap heat

Posted 6 days ago.

Kendall78

"Don't say that CO2 is a trace greenhouse gas"

I never said that, you added the trace part to imply that it is a minor thing. I did say it is a greenhouse gas and have shown why it is. You ignored all that so there is little reason to repost it.

You are free to show why CO2 doesn't fit the criteria of a greenhouse gas. In fact, I insist that you do if you believe that.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Moving toward insult I see, that's fine I know you don't have much left

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Well, I continue to wait for the proof.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Even the much debunked IPCC report stops short of saying MAN causes Global warming, they say its likely, again not proof.

Posted 6 days ago.

Kendall78

"EVERY TIME you guys.."

That's a fallacy Tired. There are no absolutes.

I've made this extremely simple for you Tired. I'll offer up my citations (again since you failed to understand them in the past) when you offer up your citations that support your position.

So quit being the living embodiment of insanity by doing the same thing over and over again and try something new like doing proper research like any 1st year freshman would do.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

OK lets make it simple. show me ONE example of PROOF that man causes Global Warming. Don't say that CO2 is a trace greenhouse gas and man produces it when they breath and therefor x must equal y that is not proof.

Posted 6 days ago.

Kendall78

"There has been NO PROOF offered here or elsewhere."

Actually that is untrue. More to the point, it is a flat out lie. You may go through the 190+ pages and find that a lot of proof have been offered but you simply do not accept it.

Posted 6 days ago.

Kendall78

Good grief guys..this isn't twitter.

"The lack of...."

In all that blabber it seems like you are a proponent that the current warming trend is normal.

Is that true?

"Science...relies on skepticism and repeatable proof."

Yeah but you only offer skepticism and no proof. Therefor you are not discussing science at all.

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Ok you don't have any I get it.

Posted 6 days ago.

Ohwiseone

There is tons of research out there all you have to do is look at it !

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Where is your proof?????? lol

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is tons of data out there that disputes Man made global warming too.

Posted 6 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Enjoy living like a mushroom , you deserve it !

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

Anyone who comes along to read this drivel will see clearly that you offer ZERO proof that man causes Global warming or is it climate change or disruption orwhat

Posted 6 days ago.

Ohwiseone

There is tons of research out there and yet you refuse it all !

Posted 6 days ago.

Tiredofit

You look very foolish when you talk about Historic norms but have NO idea what that means. It sounded good on MSNBC last night lololololol

Posted 6 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Wait there's a third option , you're both !

Posted 6 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or