Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 days ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

Oh Fraudie McFraud, you do amuse.

Posted 217 days ago.

Tiredofit

Gee a liberal court ruling if favor of socialist position. Massachusetts REALLY HARRY, they buy this Leftist BS, blow me over with a feather, wait a minute, don't blow, your breath contains POLUTANTS.

Posted 217 days ago.

Tiredofit

You people are a riot

Posted 217 days ago.

harryanderson

As to whether CO2 is a pollutant, the Supreme Court, in Massachusetts vs. EPA, gave the EPA authority to declare it a pollutant under the Clean Air Act (CCA).

The Court ruled: “The (EPA) Administrator shall by regulation prescribe (and from time to time revise) in accordance with the provisions of this section, standards applicable to the emission of any air pollutant from any class or classes of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines, which in his judgment cause, or contribute to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.”[9]

According to the CAA, an air pollutant is "any air pollution agent or combination of such agents, including any physical, chemical, biological, radioactive . . . substance or matter which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air".

And the Court stated that "greenhouse gases fit well within the CAA’s capacious definition of air pollutant."

Posted 217 days ago.

harryanderson

R1KRA8 advises us to “count the cash.”

However, the counter climate change movement (CCCM) has made that impossible. Robt. J. Brulle of Drexel U. attempted to count the cash flowing to 91 groups involved in the CCCM.

Brulle concluded:

“A large portion of the funding for CCCM organizations is untraceable. Despite extensive data compilation and analysis, only a fraction of contributions to CCCM organizations can be specifically accounted for from public records. The sizable amount of undisclosed funding, or ‘dark money’ involved in the CCCM obscures the resource mobilization practices of the CCCM.”

htt p://drexel.edu/~/media/Files/now/pdfs/Institutionalizing%20Delay%20-%20Climatic%20Change.ashx

Posted 217 days ago.

So salt kills. So do windmills......eagles, bats,sea gulls, etc. People are also complaining about noise polution, vibrations and other problems

Oh, for a carefree liberal utopia. Free healthcare, free birth control, freedom from consequences of doing what's right or wrong, and a world free frrom natural climate changes. All caused by liberals' superior brain power.

Posted 217 days ago.

Kendall78

If it helps you any, please refer to the following: politifact.c om/texas/statements/2013/dec/13/barry-smitherman/scientific-consensus-remains-planet-warming/ w w w.unep.o r g/pdf/wmo_report.p d f

Posted 217 days ago.

Kendall78

"but co2 is not a pollutant"

Neither is salt but it will kill the fish in the aquarium just the same. Too much of any chemical can be deadly and have adverse reactions to biological lifeforms.

I would suggest that you study up on something called the carbon cycle. Yes carbon is part of our natural environment but not at these level. And yes, carbon dioxide does assist in trapping heat in the atmosphere.

Posted 217 days ago.

To myth from the rock.

h ttp://cnsnews.c om/news/article/what-global-warming-2012-data-confirms-earth-cooling-trend

Merry Christmas,myth. Here is something guaranteed to help you out of the misery where you seem to dwell. For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believith in Him, shall not perish, but have everlasting life.So simple, even a rock gets it.

Posted 217 days ago.

Tiredofit

Yes but it doesn't change the climate.

Posted 217 days ago.

mythravere

Oxygen isn't a pollutant but in high enough concentrations it can kill you.

Apollo 1 for example.

Posted 217 days ago.

mythravere

The earth is not warming? Hahaha LOL!

I guess the ice sheets and glaciers that are MELTING in more places than not are melting because of some new physical process that doesn't involve heat.

Which to a point is true because of sublimation. Also helping along with that is the changes taking place in how much snow falls.

But to say flat out that there is no warming. Either you are straight up lying or you have the intelligence of a rock.

Posted 217 days ago.

He can't read.

Posted 218 days ago.

Tiredofit

Ahhh but co2 is not a pollutant

Posted 218 days ago.

Kendall78

Ithink- you would be the person that would dump salt into an aquarium and be shocked that the fish died inside.

Is it natural for so much carbon and other pollutants to be put into the atmosphere in such a small amount of time?

If no, then which is more likely...that there would be no adverse effects or that there would be?

You also say that there is no way to know. Are you familiar with that volcano that erupted in Asia a few decades ago? Remember that their was a measurable change in the temperature of the Earth from that one event? So yes, there are ways of knowing that throwing up mass amounts of pollutants would make the Earth get warmer.

Posted 218 days ago.

The earth is not warming, Kendall. Even lf it were, there is no proof whatsoever that man would have caused it. Records have been falsified, hidden,and lied about while the liars got rich. That is the history of the global warming wool over our eyes scheme.

Posted 218 days ago.

Tiredofit

The second group consists of sane people.

Posted 218 days ago.

Tiredofit

They will ignore they failed models and predictions and turn a blind eye to the legions of Marxists pushing this as social justice. They will parrot phrases they don't understand and denigrate anyone who questions as deniers and insinuate they are stupid or shilling for some oil company.

Posted 218 days ago.

Tiredofit

Not sure imbecile is appropriate, what I see are two types of people. The first group embraces government think we need more and will willingly believe anything they are told. They cannot believe that governments are at best a.necessary evil and will run to them liberties in hand for security.

Posted 218 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

Last year the average daily temp for the MOV was 43 degrees (f) This year the average temp in the mov 36 degrees 9f)

This is the norm and is what is happening in regions across the globe

BUT

You IMBECILE ti-hat wearing idiots will continue to argue that global warming is happening

Sometimes i think i should start believing abortion is ok.....then we would have less imbecile tin-hat wearing idiots destroying the human race with their STUPID ideas.

Posted 218 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or