Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
seconds ago.
by Tiredofit
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

I guess it's not your fault you were duped. I do despise those that tell these lies and know better, they are the enviromarxists I refer to. Those commenting here are just parroting the propaganda and don't know better I suppose.

Posted 238 days ago.

Tiredofit

Pay no attention to the recent ice age, ignore solar activity, dont mention the utter failure of our models and predictions, those emails were just jokes, send us more money and we will find a way to create social justice via your liberties. Hey Bill Nye science guy, while not a real live climatologist, has a little trick to show you. Check it out, it makes it all go away. Lemmings!!!

Posted 238 days ago.

harryanderson

Seems to me you’re the fearful one. You’re afraid to look at any evidence that might contradict your preconceived opinions, such as the Bill Nye stuff cited by myth.

Thanks, anyway. You provide opportunities for me to present the evidence.

Posted 238 days ago.

Tiredofit

Profiting from fear is as old as original sin. The progressive socialists have a mantra , never let a crisis go to waste, for they realize that it's a chance to get people to give up liberties. Sometimes ya just cannot wait for a crisis to come along and you need to create one, there are always enough lemmings to carry it forward.

Posted 238 days ago.

harryanderson

“Two groups of people are selling this bs, people like al gore who have figured out how to get RICH off this and useful idiots.”

Well, according to the National Academy of Scientists, “97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”

ww w.pnas.or g/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.abstract

So, Tiredofit, to which of your “two groups of people” do all these climate scientists belong?

Posted 238 days ago.

Tiredofit

Two groups of people are selling this bs, people like al gore who have figured out how to get RICH off this and useful idiots, guess where you fit.

Posted 238 days ago.

harryanderson

“You have NO PROOF WHATSOEVER of any of these things.”

Myth just offered up proof. He pointed to Bill Nye’s experiment. You refused to look at it, Tiredofit.

Posted 238 days ago.

Tiredofit

Its ok Myth, some folks believe in bigfoot, proffesional wrestling, chemtrails, the second shooter in Dallas, the fake moon landing, Elvis is alive Hoffa and Jim Morrison too, and of course manmade global warming. They are called Morons. You have NO PROOF WHATSOEVER of any of these things, only what you BELIEVE. sorta like a religion aint it.

Posted 238 days ago.

mythravere

Oh and as far as those predictions go try and comprehend this.

Our climate and its weather is a very dynamic system.

Not all predictions will be accurate.

That right there though is absolutely no reason to discount what is happening with our climate.

But one prediction that will come true is that you and the others will wail like madmen at me for saying that.

Posted 238 days ago.

mythravere

Lets rewind a bit though. Lets go back to that little test in Bill Nyes video.

Lets see how honest you are...or how much of coward you are.

If I was to acquire all of the components used in that simple experiment would I find the jar with the higher level of co2 to have a temperature that is lower or the same as the one that has a normal mix of air?

Why is that experiment false in its findings?

I bet you won't answer that straight and to the point.

Posted 238 days ago.

mythravere

Failed models you say? Prove it!

The email "thing" was debunked and shown to be nothing at all.

Besides those emails have no bearing on the world wide loss of glaciers do they?

Or the increased metaling of the ice caps.

Or abnormal weather patterns.

You know stuff that is actually happening.

Posted 238 days ago.

mythravere

The sites or whatever they are you mentioned. I've never been to any of them.

I don't get my info from places like that.

In other words..you fail again.

Posted 238 days ago.

mythravere

Where did I cite Al Gore as a source for my information? Where did I show you that I look to him for guidance?

Posted 238 days ago.

Tiredofit

Marxism could get a second wind from the climate change issue. This ideology separates the world between exploiters and exploited, rich and poor, where industrial countries exploit the under developed countries. Although this ideology lost of its importance since the fall of communism, climate change could bring it back. Indeed, it shows that the poorer countries are the one suffering the most from capitalism.

The industrialized countries are historically responsible for climate change, but they resist fighting it alone for economical reasons. The poorer countries, which are the one that contributed the least in the emission of greenhouse gases, are the one who suffers the most of its consequences. Climate change has a more powerful effect on tropical countries with natural disaster, flooding, dryness, diseases, malnutrition and contaminated water. Death is happening first in the Third world and it will increase dangerously.

In order to change this situation and push the industri

Posted 238 days ago.

Tiredofit

You can flip over to socialistaction, worldsocialist, socialistresitamce, Thesocialistproject. Marxistlabour to read more of the warmer bs if get bored with our three morons.

Posted 238 days ago.

Tiredofit

Thatsabsurd, I stand corrected

Posted 238 days ago.

Tiredofit

Myth it's abundantly clear that math is not your only cognitive problem. You clearly are not bright enough to even form a consistent argument. Track record??// good lord how about the predictions of al gore and mann or the failed models, the emails proving collusion and outright fraud from you warmers. You hold up bill Nye as a credible source, yet say if the 3100. Plus sscientists are not real climatologists they dont count. Is bill a climatologist? You guys crack me up.

Posted 238 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

Tiredofit

Not sure imbecile is appropriate, what I see are two types of people. The first group embraces government think we need more and will willingly believe anything they are told. They cannot believe that governments are at best a.necessary evil and will run to them liberties in hand for security.

That would fit a definition of imbecile.............

Posted 238 days ago.

mythravere

To top all of this off what do I see?

Kendall and Harry offering honest points for consideration in this little debate we got on here.

Neither you nor Ithink will even engage those points and detail why they are right or wrong.

Instead the goal posts get moved.

Petty and pathetic is all I can say.

Posted 238 days ago.

mythravere

And goodness lol! You bring up the old MSNBC CNN vs Fox News argument.

Yep..a load of crap! And you know it.

But I understand. Its the one thing you have to use in an argument about who is "right" etc whatever.

Posted 238 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or