Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 days ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

If the tobacco companies did a peer reviewed study suggesting smoking made you smarter, I would be a skeptic. When the Ippc who's very funding depends on a crisis says something I am a skeptic. When the predictions dont come to fruition I am a doubter

Posted 216 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is no proof that man has any such influence over climate. There are suspected links, bad models, but no ACTUAL proof, just a handful of people with a 7 or8 million dollar budget keeping the gravy train rolling.

Posted 216 days ago.

h ttp://nypost.c om/2013/12/26/professor-admits-faking-aids-vaccine-to-get-19m-in-grants/

"Professor admits faking AIDS vaccine to get $19M in grants"

Whether it is medical research, or climate research, just follow the money. What a corrupt bunch of snakes come out of our supposedly schools of learning these days. I wouldn't believe a climate scientist unless I knew enough about him to know he is honest.I know plenty of crooked ones have been exposed.

Did you notice it was a very low year for tornadoes this year? And what had your imbecile scientists predicted?

Posted 216 days ago.

Kendall78

It's only political if you allow it to be so. Ignore the politics and focus on the science the best you can.

Posted 216 days ago.

Kendall78

"the recent ice age"

I find it interesting that you mention this since one of the possible causes of the Little Ice Age (who knows or really cares if you were talking about it) was due to a volcano throwing up material into the atmosphere.

Another possibly cause is the altered change in the ocean flow due to the Medieval Warm Trend.

So while these causes were natural, mankind can assist in creating these causes again. Climate is complex but to ignore that we are in fact a contributor to it is foolish and dangerous.

Posted 216 days ago.

Tiredofit

The two are inseparable as it IS a political agenada, not a scientific discussion.

Posted 216 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired, Ithink- out of the past 2 pages I have seen NO evidence of any kind to back up your position. You have done nothing but deny without and try to make this a political argument instead of a scientific one.

Posted 216 days ago.

Tiredofit

I guess it's not your fault you were duped. I do despise those that tell these lies and know better, they are the enviromarxists I refer to. Those commenting here are just parroting the propaganda and don't know better I suppose.

Posted 216 days ago.

Tiredofit

Pay no attention to the recent ice age, ignore solar activity, dont mention the utter failure of our models and predictions, those emails were just jokes, send us more money and we will find a way to create social justice via your liberties. Hey Bill Nye science guy, while not a real live climatologist, has a little trick to show you. Check it out, it makes it all go away. Lemmings!!!

Posted 216 days ago.

harryanderson

Seems to me you’re the fearful one. You’re afraid to look at any evidence that might contradict your preconceived opinions, such as the Bill Nye stuff cited by myth.

Thanks, anyway. You provide opportunities for me to present the evidence.

Posted 216 days ago.

Tiredofit

Profiting from fear is as old as original sin. The progressive socialists have a mantra , never let a crisis go to waste, for they realize that it's a chance to get people to give up liberties. Sometimes ya just cannot wait for a crisis to come along and you need to create one, there are always enough lemmings to carry it forward.

Posted 216 days ago.

harryanderson

“Two groups of people are selling this bs, people like al gore who have figured out how to get RICH off this and useful idiots.”

Well, according to the National Academy of Scientists, “97–98% of the climate researchers most actively publishing in the field support the tenets of ACC outlined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”

ww w.pnas.or g/content/early/2010/06/04/1003187107.abstract

So, Tiredofit, to which of your “two groups of people” do all these climate scientists belong?

Posted 216 days ago.

Tiredofit

Two groups of people are selling this bs, people like al gore who have figured out how to get RICH off this and useful idiots, guess where you fit.

Posted 216 days ago.

harryanderson

“You have NO PROOF WHATSOEVER of any of these things.”

Myth just offered up proof. He pointed to Bill Nye’s experiment. You refused to look at it, Tiredofit.

Posted 216 days ago.

Tiredofit

Its ok Myth, some folks believe in bigfoot, proffesional wrestling, chemtrails, the second shooter in Dallas, the fake moon landing, Elvis is alive Hoffa and Jim Morrison too, and of course manmade global warming. They are called Morons. You have NO PROOF WHATSOEVER of any of these things, only what you BELIEVE. sorta like a religion aint it.

Posted 216 days ago.

mythravere

Oh and as far as those predictions go try and comprehend this.

Our climate and its weather is a very dynamic system.

Not all predictions will be accurate.

That right there though is absolutely no reason to discount what is happening with our climate.

But one prediction that will come true is that you and the others will wail like madmen at me for saying that.

Posted 216 days ago.

mythravere

Lets rewind a bit though. Lets go back to that little test in Bill Nyes video.

Lets see how honest you are...or how much of coward you are.

If I was to acquire all of the components used in that simple experiment would I find the jar with the higher level of co2 to have a temperature that is lower or the same as the one that has a normal mix of air?

Why is that experiment false in its findings?

I bet you won't answer that straight and to the point.

Posted 216 days ago.

mythravere

Failed models you say? Prove it!

The email "thing" was debunked and shown to be nothing at all.

Besides those emails have no bearing on the world wide loss of glaciers do they?

Or the increased metaling of the ice caps.

Or abnormal weather patterns.

You know stuff that is actually happening.

Posted 216 days ago.

mythravere

The sites or whatever they are you mentioned. I've never been to any of them.

I don't get my info from places like that.

In other words..you fail again.

Posted 216 days ago.

mythravere

Where did I cite Al Gore as a source for my information? Where did I show you that I look to him for guidance?

Posted 216 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or