Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
4 days ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

I know how to get near limitless energy.

All one needs is a massive picture of Obama...all the Obama hating righties and a enough wind turbines to catch the limitless breeze that will emanate from those righties.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

Actually I do hear crickets. LOL. One got in my bedroom once. Man it was he11 finding that sonofabeach.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

"IF CO2 is the culprit, how can you dismiss the role of BILLIONS of squirrels>? why is the CO2 they emit any different than CO2 that YOU emit?"

"I'm gonna go out on a limb here that since squirrels live in trees and areas with lots of plants and such. I am betting their meager output of co2 is taken up by the plants in their local environment before it can harm the climate. Not that they could anyways."

Co2..plant "food"....trees grow....where co2 tree eat come from. Make o2.

Blah.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

I will say this.

I would be surprised to find out you are actually a young person.

You must be old because you are so set in your ways and can only see things in a certain light.

Hence you bringing up the government.

Its the old Republicans that hate and fear the government.

And you always get caught up on that and bring it out.

Whateves....

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

You know I was about to explain something then I figured. Why?

Oh well. I think its time for some violent science fiction.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

You Tiredofit have already shown me that anything I show you will be rejected.

So whats the point. You don't really want to know.

All you want to do is have me say something then you slap it down.

Thats all you are in this for.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

" Ground squirrels for instance. But if trees will neutralize the co2 produced by billions of squirrels, why do we need Govt to tax the*****out of our economy again?????"

You really need to told the answer to this.

Ok. We've massively deforested this world.

Try to imagine what our country looked like before we came over here. Thats all gone and man is slowly destroying whats called the lungs of the world. The Amazon Rain Forest.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

You dimwit. LOL! I guess this is where I need to tell you that I was in your camp not too long ago.

I didn't believe man had a role in it. And I vehemently argued that point on these very threads and forums before you were ever on hear.

I've been posting on here since 2007 maybe even back in 2006. Something like that.

So I have represented both side of this debate.

I realized I was wrong.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

Honestly I don't hate the right. I hate their insanity.

People like you don't help that.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

Oh god you ******* dumbass.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here that since squirrels live in trees and areas with lots of plants and such. I am betting their meager output of co2 is taken up by the plants in their local environment before it can harm the climate. Not that they could anyways.

So I guess I just played your game again.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

Nah. What this whole thing boils down to is that you hate anyone who you perceive as not being in the same camp as you. And that revolves around people political inclinations.

You see all of us as part of the vast left wing conspiracy.

Therefor you can not allow us to be right about anything we say and that is why you play these little games on here the way you do.

Thats it straight and simple.

There is no other explanation to why you conduct yourself in the manner you do on these forums.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

Your thoughts are the same throughout all of the posts.

The problem with you is that no fact can be laid on the table that you won't reject.

You're just a worthless troll. And thats it.

You don't care about the debate on this issue.

We've offered gobs of information.

Meh? You just reject it.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

Squirrels also have no role in changing the climate.

I agree with that comment.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

Also. Another thing. You aren't so stupid that you don't realize that its best to keep your trap shut and not put any facts on the table because if you do then they would be up for scrutiny by the rest of us.

And I would lay a 500 bucks on the table that is exactly why you won't pony up why you are right.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

Failure to share those details will mean that you aren't interested in said debate. It means you have other goals.

And what honestly could be the benefit of calling us out on being in error in regards to our beliefs on climate change and then flat out refusing to offer the evidence that proves us wrong?

You don't want to see action taken on this issue right? Then why leave people operating under a false belief about that issue?

What it boils down to is that you're just on here to stir*****and nothing else.

Because if you had the facts well then by god I bet you just pour them onto the table.

But you don't. Which most certainly means you are just talking out of your rear on this issue and understands nothing about.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

And so you know its not about proving man DOESN'T cause climate change. Its taking those facts the tell you man has no role in it and sharing those.

Like I said. If you are attempting to be an honest participant in this debate then you will share those details.

Posted 84 days ago.

mythravere

You're biggest piece of*****idiot I have ever seen. Jesus Christ how do go through life being so danged ****tard stupid?

Its real simple Tiredofit. You say we are wrong and you are right. Therefor your position being the one that harbors the truth should have the facts back up said truth.

Its really that simple. If you are right and I am wrong then the facts and information should line up in your favor.

And if you honestly care about this issue then you should have no problem sharing those facts that prove us wrong WITH US.

DEE DEE DEE!

Posted 84 days ago.

harryanderson

Actually, the percentage of respondents who thought we "should take action to reduce climate change" was a little lower than 64%.

Half the respondents were asked question A, and the other half were asked question B. Of one group, 64% agreed. Of the other 60% agreed.

A slight difference indeed, but we should point it out. Accuracy is important.

Posted 84 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Either give an answer or you shut the HeII up !

Posted 84 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Afraid of the answer you'd give ? You still haven't answered the question ! Too busy trying to sidestep the issue are you ? Where does Faux get their "research" tiredbrain ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ?????

Posted 84 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or