Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
6 hours ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

"no proof at all, morons all."

Would that include you Tired because you offer no proof for your positions. ;)

Posted 20 days ago.

Ohwiseone

WOW what a dingle berry !

Posted 20 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Tired it wouldn't matter if god himself supported the scientific view on climate change , you would call him a moron a liar and fraud ! The indoctrination is complete on this one !

Posted 20 days ago.

Ohwiseone

76 out of 79 climatologists who "listed climate science as their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change" believe that mean global temperatures have risen compared to pre-1800s levels, and 75 out of 77 believe that human activity is a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures.

Posted 20 days ago.

mythravere

Or they stupidly prescribe an issue to their political opponents erroneously.

Like has been done with climate change.

Posted 20 days ago.

mythravere

Also he knows full well that if he were to believe it then it would put him outside the boundaries of what is considered "proper" republican thinking.

He's a lemming. He's a conformist. And above all else he's not a freethinker.

Heck. We've all seen how he reacts to you labeling yourself a conservative. He calls you are fraud and acts as if your beliefs aren't legitimate.

Some people get so wrapped up in their "politics" it cripples their critical thinking and they become incapable of considering anything outside the bounds of their chosen political stripe.

Posted 20 days ago.

mythravere

Harry. Seriously. Don't even bother going to any kind of explanation about this issue with Tiredofit.

You and me both know that no matter how good of an explanation it is...he'll just reject it without a single consideration to its veracity.

Tiredofit has fully proven that his opinion on this issue is heavily politicized. And thats the angle he is coming from. Thats the reason why he thinks its all a hoax.

Posted 20 days ago.

mythravere

Oh god lol! Just for giggles. Whose authority told you it was all wrong Tiredofit?

Apparently some authority has appealed to you because something had to inform you in such a way that it caused you to field the opinion that you do.

And that authority is very very well funded.

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

Hardly 97-percent lol but you know that, you are just a liar and fraud.

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

LIAR and FRAUD

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

The Doran paper has been criticised by many sceptics in the past, where a survey of 10,256 with 3146 respondents was whittled down to 75 out of 77 “expert” ‘active climate researchers’ (ACR) to give the 97% figure, based on just two very simplistic (shallow) questions that even the majority of sceptics might agree with.

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

The Doran paper has been criticised by many sceptics in the past, where a survey of 10,256 with 3146 respondents was whittled down to 75 out of 77 “expert” ‘active climate researchers’ (ACR) to give the 97% figure, based on just two very simplistic (shallow) questions that even the majority of sceptics might agree with.

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

The Doran paper has been criticised by many sceptics in the past, where a survey of 10,256 with 3146 respondents was whittled down to 75 out of 77 “expert” ‘active climate researchers’ (ACR) to give the 97% figure, based on just two very simplistic (shallow) questions that even the majority of sceptics might agree with.

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

Barry you are a liar and a fraud.

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

Testimony of 97%? Where did they testify?

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

Appeal to authority of the best paid people in science but NO PROOF

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

You cannot cite ONE example of a provable fact that ties co2 and man to global warming, NOT ONE.

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

You cannot cite ONE example of a provable fact that ties co2 and man to global warming, NOT ONE.

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is no 97% agreement and you know it Harry the fraud.

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

Lol no proof at all, morons all.

Posted 20 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or