Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 hours ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

Afraid of the answer you'd give ? You still haven't answered the question ! Too busy trying to sidestep the issue are you ? Where does Faux get their "research" tiredbrain ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ?????

Posted 57 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Ugh ,tiredbrain say earth is flat and ball of fire in sky big lightning bug !Maybe we should take up a collection so you can go back to a more primitive culture ! There , they might believe you !Oh wait even most primitive societies would have more on the ball than you !

Posted 57 days ago.

harryanderson

I believe we'll see more Republicans proposing conservative solutions to global warming.

I'm hopeful because, as Bloomberg News reports, "In stark contrast to their party's public stance on Capitol Hill, many Republicans privately acknowledge the scientific consensus that human activity is at least partially responsible for climate change and recognize the need to address the problem."

ww w.bloomberg.co m/news/2014-08-15/many-republicans-privately-support-action-on-climate.html

The left would like to use this issue to implement their big-government agenda. We must fight for our own solutions. Too many Republican leaders are fighting against the Republicans who "recognize the need to address the problem."

That's 64% of them. According to a poll from Yale, 64% of Republicans and Republican leaning independents think we "should take steps to address climate change."

environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Republican_Views_on_Climate_Change.pdf

Posted 57 days ago.

mythravere

I mean if you seriously cared out this issue you divulge all you know that proves you are right.

Lol. You probably show this thread to your friends so that can see how you are getting our goats so to speak.

The thing is if that were true...man what a pathetic existence you and your friends share.

Posted 57 days ago.

mythravere

In other words what you do is akin to walking into a room and lifting your leg and cranking out a great big stinker.

Just a stupid troll is all you are.

You must have a boring life.

Posted 57 days ago.

mythravere

Hey Tiredofit since what we believe is a hoax (not) then it'd be pretty hard to prove anything without any facts to back it up right?

But that must mean that what you believe has hard evidence backing it up.

Care to share that info?

Of course not.

But you would if you were honestly opposed to this issue.

You see right there demonstrates your reasoning for chiming in on this issue.

You are just trying to get a rise out of everyone else while they honestly try and talk about this issue.

Posted 57 days ago.

Ohwiseone

You still haven't answered the question ! Too busy trying to sidestep the issue are you ? Where does Faux get their "research" tiredbrain ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ?????

Posted 57 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Oh, and you're the embarrassment !I bet you wouldn't make your idiotic claims in public !

Posted 57 days ago.

Ohwiseone

But you have been shown hard science and your adherence to right-wing dogma wont permit you to accept it !Like the rulers of krypton you'll die before you'll admit you are wrong !

Posted 57 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Still a idiotic stance from right-wing dogma doesn't compare to hard science !Conclusion is the vast majority believes that there is a problem and that man has a part in it ! Look most anywhere you want and the research will bear that out !But you don't really want to do you ?

Posted 57 days ago.

Ohwiseone

You still haven't answered the question ! Since you're so eaten up by the right-wing nonsense machine , I'd like to see where your reasoning for doubt comes from !Where does Faux get their "research" tiredbrain ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? You say one thing but you believe the same thing from another non-credible source ! So far no answer !!! Come on ,fill us all in !

Posted 57 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Where does Faux get their "research" tiredbrain ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? You say one thing but you believe the same thing from another non-credible source ! So far no answer !!! Come on ,fill us all in !

Posted 57 days ago.

Kendall78

Well if you don't have evidence about the experiment, why are you ranting so much?

Posted 57 days ago.

Kendall78

"Where is the evidence?"

That's what I'm asking you for Tired but you keep deflecting from giving any. You basically say the experiment is wrong but you offer no proof why it is.

You say that global warming is part of a natural cycle but yet you offer no proof to back that assertion up.

What's wrong with you anyway?

Posted 57 days ago.

Ohwiseone

How utterly typical of a republican repeater ! Crow all you want but the evidence is there and has been shown and you like always, choose to be ignorant and bury your head up your rump !Its still a free country , do what you want but ignorant and stupid isn't attractive !

Posted 57 days ago.

Ohwiseone

A idiotic stance that is promoted by right-wing dogma or a view of research done by real scientists ! Hmmmmmmm ! You're the one who has a fixation on right-wing bullsh&t !

Posted 57 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Truthiness - Faux , that seems impossible !Lets see who will out last the other ! A idiotic stance that is promoted by right-wing dogma or a view of research done by real scientists ! Hmmmmmmm !

Posted 57 days ago.

Kendall78

I'm just wondering if you have ever tried the experiment or not. Do you rely on emperical data or truthiness?

Posted 57 days ago.

Kendall78

Oh Tired, no proof to back up anything you have said. Try the experiment and see if it works or not.

Posted 57 days ago.

mythravere

Besides just opening the jar could let in trace gases from you local environment that could skew the results of the experiment.

You making fun of that shows that you have little understanding of the precision needed to obtain accurate results.

Posted 58 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or