Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
39 minutes ago.
by harryanderson
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

If you had anything you would be all over it, remember the little bill nye experiment? lol You guys were all touting it as PROOF by GOLLY that CO2 caused global warming. Poor gullible fools. Once I showed the MANY ways this was flawed you all sorta forgot about that one. lolol except for Myth, I don't think he ever figured out that it was fake, poor myth

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

LOL its so*******obvious that you have nothing. Its getting a little embarrassing .

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

All this energy and all you have to do is show ONE VERIFIABLE PROVABLE REPEATABLE FACT that shows MAN is causing global warming. Come on Munster and Kendall, Mythy and fraudulent Harry, if I am soooooooo dumb and all this proof exists, lay it out here.........cue the crickets

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

I cannot prove a negative Kendall, now prove your case. I don't think Man, three toes sloths, Tupperware, sea slugs, microwave pizza, or red headed girls are responsible for global warming. ALL NEGATIVES that CANNOT be proven, if you wish to debate how red headed girls eating microwave pizza are somehow responsible go right ahead.

Posted 20 days ago.

Ohwiseone

When tiredbrain says " BILLIONS of grant dollars DO INDEED influence the results" tell me , TO WHAT END ?????

Posted 20 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Where does Faux get their "research" tiredbrain ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? You say one thing but you believe the same thing from another non-credible source !

Posted 20 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Kendall, Its very clear that tiredbrain wont accept the research from any source because then that would mean he's wrong !

Posted 20 days ago.

Kendall78

"I cannot prove a negative and you have offered no proof"

No matter how many times you say it, no one has asked you to try and prove a negative and proof was given to you many many times on this very thread. Ignoring it is not the same as not having it given to you.

Posted 20 days ago.

Kendall78

"MY SIDE SAYS MAN DOES NOT CAUSE GLOBAL WARMING"

So you are claiming ignorance as to why global warming is happening?

Ok..you're just stupid then and revel in that. No surprise there.

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

1. One side says that the current heating of the Earth is due to mankind in part and have offered up proof to that. LIE YOU OFFERED NO PROOF ONLY OPINION

2. The opposition (you) says that the current heating is part of the natural cycle. However, no proof is given to back up this proposition. WRONG, MY SIDE SAYS MAN DOES NOT CAUSE GLOBAL WARMING. A NEGATIVE Try again

Posted 20 days ago.

Tiredofit

Where is the proof of your assertion?/? I cannot prove a negative and you have offered no proof , no matter how hard you try to lie a d twist fact is you have none.

Posted 20 days ago.

Kendall78

"In say manmade global warming does not exist."

Have I ever asked you to prove something does not exist?

The answer is no btw. Let me spoonfeed this to you.

1. One side says that the current heating of the Earth is due to mankind in part and have offered up proof to that.

2. The opposition (you) says that the current heating is part of the natural cycle. However, no proof is given to back up this proposition.

See...no proving the negative, so there is no weaseling out of it. Can you provide proof to you belief or not?

Posted 20 days ago.

Kendall78

"If the only evidence for something's existence is a lack of evidence for it not existing.."

Oy vey...Tired, in no way did I imply that man made global warming relies on this.

You made a statement about today's increase in global heat is part of the natural cycle. There for, you should easily be able to show the similarities of today's heat increase with past events. You should be able to point out natural phenomenon that are the cause of the increased heat.

You haven't and frankly I don't think you can.

Posted 20 days ago.

mythravere

Now how about your next contrived controversy? Eh tiredofit?

Posted 20 days ago.

mythravere

And for the record I do not want to see any sort of carbon tax since I know it will used by certain greedy folks in the financial industry to make a hefty profit by speculating.

Posted 20 days ago.

mythravere

On a side note. BNSF railroad is experimenting with natural gas powered locomotives right now.

Whats interesting is it brings back into the railroad lexicon the use of the word tender. Since a tank car(tender) that provides the gas is behind the locomotive.

So things are changing.

Posted 20 days ago.

mythravere

I am going to put this here in all caps so my position is clear.

NOTHING CAN BE DONE IN MY OPINION TO STOP CLIMATE CHANGE NOW.

WE HAVE TO ADAPT TO THE CHANGES THAT COMES OUR WAY.

That means an all of the above approach to energy.

If we can use wind,hydro etc in certain areas. Then do it. Areas like ours that aren't really suited to them. Use natural gas or coal with carbon sequestration(provided its viable and safe)

But from an economic standpoint we are going to see a lot more gas fired power stations come online versus coal power.

Coal was supplanted as a means of fuel for the railroads when more economical diesel fueled locomotives came on the scene.

And so it will be with power generation.

Posted 20 days ago.

mythravere

How yea. Here recently was it not you who said that even though there IS warming man is not responsible for it?

But now you are saying there is no warming?

Consistency in position isn't your strong suit.

So which is it?

Posted 20 days ago.

mythravere

"It is you Larry and Shemp who claim man and co2 are causing cataclysmic warming which will forever change the world and make it a living he'll."

I never said that it would make life a living he11.

What no one knows is how it will affect weather patterns. We don't know how those will shift. Note I am talking about day to day and season to season weather.

You concrete block of a brain might get confused by that.

But a rising sea level. Yea. That will make things difficult for people. Especially people who live on the coasts or on low lying islands.

We'll see new challenges to how we live.

Thats what I am saying. Not the sensationalist bs that you project onto me.

Posted 20 days ago.

mythravere

"What a convienent way of saying "trust us, it may be cooler everywhere else but the deep ocean now there its getting warmer. Lol"

Global warming isn't about just the atmosphere.

But I guess you can't be bothered to understand that the land and oceans also absorb heat. In fact water absorbs way more heat than the air.

But who am I kidding huck yuck!

Its all a hoax right? Riiiigggghht!

Posted 20 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or