Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
16 minutes ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

Wow you are dumb. Lol

Posted 19 days ago.

Tiredofit

You have bought into a MYTH, of which there is no proof in fact, every prediction is wrong.

Posted 19 days ago.

mythravere

" The burden of proof is on the individual proposing existence, not the one questioning existence."

Ok. See previous posts in this here forum.

But you must know that you are proposing the existence of the fact that mans does not have a role in climate change so you are therefore responsible in proving the existence of what you say.

To you this fact is concrete and tangible therefore it exists and requires said proof.

Posted 19 days ago.

Tiredofit

Still waiting for just one fact MYTH still do t have one?

Posted 19 days ago.

Tiredofit

One important element to remember in regards to negative proof is that once positive evidence has been presented the burden shifts to the skeptic to refute the evidence presented. One cannot keep arguing from the position of "negative proof" after the presentation of evidence. SO AGAIN I ASK FOR ONE SOLID PROVABLE FACT THAT PROVES MAN IS CAUSING GLOBAL WARMING.

Posted 19 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit. Do you old chap spray vinegar at chemtrails?

Because the excuses you put on the table for not believing this stuff is akin to doing just that.

Posted 19 days ago.

Tiredofit

Lol

Posted 19 days ago.

Tiredofit

In say manmade global warming does not exist. Now Jimmy does that clear it up for ya.

Posted 19 days ago.

Tiredofit

If the only evidence for something's existence is a lack of evidence for it not existing, then the default position is one of skepticism and not credulity. This type of negative proof is common in proofs of God's existence or in pseudosciences where it is used to attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic rather than the proponent of the idea. The burden of proof is on the individual proposing existence, not the one questioning existence.

Posted 19 days ago.

Tiredofit

I guess you dont know what it means to prove a negative

Posted 19 days ago.

mythravere

Conversing with Tiredofit is like trying to talk sensibly with the chemtrail and 9-11 truther nuts.

There's no way to penetrate their circular logic.

They have what they believe and if anything contradicts it. They will find a way to discount the conflicting facts.

They see life through Funhouse Mirrors.

And what they see is filled with distortions .

Posted 19 days ago.

mythravere

"They reward those that develop theories that predict devastation by funding more and more of their research."

This is just Tiredofit's fear addled mind trying to justify not believing in something that contradicts something he believes.

So he invents a reason.

Posted 19 days ago.

mythravere

Well I think its becoming more clear by the post that Tiredofit can only see things in a certain light.

If what he sees doesn't jive with what he believes or he is told something that contradicts what he wants to believe he just discounts it. He then blindly attaches one of his asinine justifications to it so that he can discount it.

Those justifications are: 1.They're doing it for money. 2.Its a socialist plot. Its usually one of those two.

Posted 19 days ago.

Kendall78

Ithink....is your strategy in all this, "When in doubt..bring up Al Gore"

Isn't that akin to the Far Left that says, "When in doubt..bring up Dubya Bush"?

Posted 20 days ago.

One thing for sure, Rush and Fox News are more credible than you.

Posted 20 days ago.

Not "research". It's manipulating and manufacturing lies. Instead of Gore, et al, being right about the Arctic ice being gone, it is increasing. Silly guessers

Posted 20 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Like I said , unless Rush or Faux said it is true tirebrain will po-po it !

Posted 20 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Well I guess that tiredbrain cant be wrong when there wont ever be any research it will believe ! All research is funded one way or another so there can never be any that has any basis in fact !Millions of hours of research invalidated by the simple notion that tiredbrain says its all skewed because of funding !

Posted 20 days ago.

Kendall78

"Cannot prove a negative."

I have never asked you to prove the negative...not once. You should try to make your lies more opaque.

Posted 20 days ago.

Ohweirdone, do you only know about rich republiicans ? Take a look at Soros...the Kennedy family, Jay Rockefeller, Pelosi, Boxer, Reid,and a pack of other rich democrats.

And if they are not rich, they will be when they leave office. Like Clinton and Gore. Look for Bamy to be a millionaire, too. Going green means raking in green dollars for democrat politicians.

Ohweirdone, I change your name because you change names.

Posted 20 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or