Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
9 hours ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

Jimmy you can debate yourself since you have clearly taken both sides( although you lied about it)

Posted 83 days ago.

Stillhere

This shows you to be little more than a common liar no?

Posted 83 days ago.

Stillhere

Kendall78

Why do you lie? When have I claimed CO2 is the cause?

Kendall78

"DO YOU HAVE PROOF that CO2 produced by man is warming the planet?"

Yes and it's been provided.

Remember this little GEM from while back?

Posted 83 days ago.

Kendall78

It's a sure fire way to deal with someone trolling, just turn the questions back on them.

They get very defensive very quickly. Mostly because they are really only after emotional responses and have little real knowledge on the topic.

Posted 83 days ago.

Kendall78

Nope, I didn't ask you to prove a negative. You complain that scientists don't work to disprove their theories, so I asked you to.

Why can't you do that? Is it due to intellectual laziness or something else?

Posted 83 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Ole whiny pus$ !

Posted 83 days ago.

Stillhere

Bye lil jimmy argue with yourself, you seem to be one both side despite lying about your own words, Do have a great day

Posted 83 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The great liar and denier wants 500 pages !He will argue and nit pick till its blue in the face !

Posted 83 days ago.

Stillhere

Bye lil jimmy

Posted 83 days ago.

Kendall78

Still I just see opinion from you on your theories. Are you no better than the supposed scientists you talk about?

Thank you...I always have great days:)

Posted 83 days ago.

Stillhere

And yea you did ask to prove a negative but just like you called me a liar for saying you claimed co2 was causing global warming, you now deny your own words yet again. I have grown weary of your silliness have a great day

Posted 83 days ago.

Kendall78

Besides science, you seem a lesson in history. Centuries prior to developing the theories involving global warming, mankind polluted the air. I suggest you research London Fog that actually killed people.

So the problem with air pollution did exist before the theories on what it's doing to us.

Posted 83 days ago.

Stillhere

Lol well if the haed of Noaa is not good enough for you jimmy i d ont know what to tell you, believe as you will, really domt care;). Have a great day

Posted 83 days ago.

Kendall78

Never asked you to prove a negative. I asked you to do what you want scientists to do...disprove theories.

Is it that difficult for you?

Posted 83 days ago.

Kendall78

"It is no secret that a lot of climate-change research is subject to opinion,"

Evidence?

Posted 83 days ago.

Stillhere

And once again for the colossally stupid, you cannot prove a negative

Posted 83 days ago.

Stillhere

And no jimmy its you that due to a lack of formal education doesnt seem to understand what science is, its always based on skepticism not a pre conceived notion

Posted 83 days ago.

Stillhere

Of course the earth has warmed or there would be mile thick ice sheets over your trailer, nonone is arguing that the earths climate is constant, nice bait and switch but it wont work here

Posted 83 days ago.

Stillhere

Evidence that co2 is warming the planet? Oh thats right you dont think is is until you do, lol

Posted 83 days ago.

Stillhere

It is no secret that a lot of climate-change research is subject to opinion, that climate models sometimes disagree even on the signs of the future changes (e.g. drier vs. wetter future climate). The problem is, only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians' - and readers' - attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today's world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty

By the way Ms Kopacz is the noaa cliamte project leader

Posted 83 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or