Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
12 days ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

harryanderson

Your statement is factual. Only one out of every 143 papers on global warming reject it.

Posted 22 days ago.

harryanderson

You have unwittingly shown how extreme the "reject AGW" scientists are.

Posted 22 days ago.

harryanderson

So those who "reject AGW" are a small number of outliers whose views disagree with the consensus.

Posted 22 days ago.

harryanderson

According to your own figures and your own reasoning, only one paper of every 143 agrees with you.

Posted 22 days ago.

Stillhere

my statement is absolutely factual do you DENY that

Posted 22 days ago.

Stillhere

Let's just say that 67% of peer reviewed experts either denied or did not endorse the theory of man made global warming, correct?

Posted 22 days ago.

Stillhere

So you are deliberately misleading ( yeah lying).

Posted 22 days ago.

Stillhere

So you are deliberately misleading ( yeah lying).

Posted 22 days ago.

Stillhere

So you are deliberately misleading ( yeah lying).

Posted 22 days ago.

Stillhere

The vast majority of the papers reviewed DID NOT ENDORSE THE THEORY OF MAN MADE GLOBAL WARMING, my statement is also true right HARRY

Posted 22 days ago.

Stillhere

Lol that's hardly 97% of scientists

Posted 22 days ago.

harryanderson

Owiseone's post is accurate. 97% of those who took a position agreed.

So is yours. You say that only "32.6% endorsed it. And the way you also say, "0.7% rejected AGW."

Seven-tenths of a percent is 1/143. So you've provided further evidence of the consensus by stating that only one paper of 143 agrees with your position by "rejecting AGW."

And therein lies the rub. Scientists who study the issue overwhelmingly disagree with the deniers, even as the deniers have managed to hoodwink many who lack the expertise to make a judgment.

Posted 22 days ago.

Stillhere

Here’s the genesis of the lie. When you take a result of 32.6% of all papers that accept AGW, ignoring the 66% that don’t, and twist that into 97%, excluding any mention of that original value in your media reports, there’s nothing else to call it – a lie of presidential proportions.

Posted 22 days ago.

Stillhere

From the 11 994 papers, 32.6 per cent endorsed AGW, 66.4 per cent stated no position on AGW, 0.7 per cent rejected AGW and in 0.3 per cent of papers, the authors said the cause of global warming was uncertain.

Posted 22 days ago.

Stillhere

The 97% consensus – a lie of epic proportions Posted by Anthony Watts

Posted 22 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Skeptical Science's 2013 'The Consensus Project'......A Skeptical Science peer-reviewed survey of all (over 12,000) peer-reviewed abstracts on the subject 'global climate change' and 'global warming' published between 1991 and 2011 (Cook et al. 2013) found that over 97% of the papers taking a position on the subject agreed with the consensus position that humans are causing global warming.

Posted 22 days ago.

Stillhere

Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis FORBES

Posted 23 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Cant fight the truth so deflect, deflect,deflect !

Posted 23 days ago.

Stillhere

Is that a hockey stick in your pocket or are you just glad to see me? Loololl

Posted 24 days ago.

Stillhere

Is that a hockey stick in your pocket or are you just glad to see me? Loololl

Posted 24 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or