Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
4 hours ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

Ok, you don't believe the accuracy of thousands of Earth based thermometers in the past but you will believe a handful of rovers and a satellite around Mars as to the temperature there?

Exactly why do you think Pluto is warmer? Is there some independant group not affiliated with a govt agency that is measuring temps on dwarf planets?

Posted 103 days ago.

Kendall78

Exactly why are we discussing a planet that is farther away from the Sun than ours, with little atmosphere, no oceans and have not been accurately observed like our world has?

Posted 103 days ago.

mythravere

Oh yea thats like 130 some degrees away reality by the way.

Posted 104 days ago.

mythravere

"In a condemnatory speech last week against the Obama administration’s new Environmental Protection Agency carbon emission regulations, Kentucky state Sen. Brandon Smith (R) claimed that man-made climate change is scientifically implausible because Mars and Earth share “exactly” the same temperature."

OMG! LOL!

So Tiredofit do you agree with what he said?

Whoo Boy the face of stupid right thar.

Posted 104 days ago.

Kendall78

Not a difficult question, tell me why you want to know if I had a Govt job or if I have NOT had one. If you don't wish to answer fine but I'm not going to answer til you do.

Posted 111 days ago.

Kendall78

"WHY would one have to go to such lengths if there was not something to hide"

Probably because they are not hiding anything and you just won't accept their findings.

"Secondly I doubt the FOIA request would do much good outside the US"

The conversation was mostly about NOAA which is within the US. Focus Danielsan...focus.

Posted 111 days ago.

mythravere

When I used 110% it meant that you go above and beyond in regards to your bias toward climate change.

In other words your bias is in the realm of irrationality.

Posted 111 days ago.

Kendall78

"There will be no raw data from this supposed NASSA mission"

You doubt NASA when they said they sent a satellite up?

"Just like he IPCC hides its raw data so shall this be"

I am certain that under the freedom of information Act, if you want to see the data you can. Try and find out and report back to us.

"Have you ever worked a Govt job?"

Again...why is this relevant?

Posted 111 days ago.

Kendall78

"And when a person's opinion is that biased you'll never be able to convince them otherwise."

I have no desire to change his mind. I just like to get his opinions written down so when he is proven wrong, he cannot deny it later.

Posted 111 days ago.

Kendall78

"Have you ever worked a Govt job?"

Why is that relevant to all this?

Posted 111 days ago.

mythravere

Like I have said before. You can lay every single fact on the table. Tiredofit and his ilk will just deny all of it.

Posted 111 days ago.

mythravere

And when a person's opinion is that biased you'll never be able to convince them otherwise.

Posted 111 days ago.

mythravere

The only thing Tiredofit will accept as fact on this issue is information that shows that scientists are lying about it and that its all a hoax.

He is diametrically opposed to this issue.

He is 110% biased against mans role in changing our climate.

Nothing can convince him that it is real.

Posted 111 days ago.

Kendall78

"SO its sorta important."

I'm not saying it's not noteworthy or anything. But unless you actually have real examples where NOAA has done these theoretical exagerrations...you have nothing.

"There is NO WAY that the data will say.."

All I care to see from that satellite is information on whether CO2 effects the way our atmosphere absorbs the energy from the Sun. And whether yes or no, that the public accept the findings. Denial in the face of hard facts (no matter the side of the argument) is pitiful.

Posted 111 days ago.

Kendall78

What Monica Kopacz had to say in the past has nothing to do with this satellite or even man made global warming really.

Unless you can clearly point out where NOAA or other major agencies have willfully lied with information...her statement is nothing but opinion.

Posted 111 days ago.

Kendall78

"I don't think we can call this unbiased"

Sooo.that's a no from you. To be more precise...no information from any satellite will be accepted by you as fact. Even if the infor gathered supports your position. Is this true?

Posted 111 days ago.

Kendall78

NASA launched its Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) today. The satellite, "will study the absorption of sunlight by carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere."

Can both sides of the argument agree that whatever this satellite discovers will be considered FACT and not an opinion or conspiracy please?

Posted 111 days ago.

Kendall78

Also keep in mind that not once has anyone tried to use "racism" to disavow any of Tired's positions on climate change.

Of course, Tired has yet to clarify his position on climate change really.

Posted 113 days ago.

Kendall78

Ithink, do you agree that woman are emotional like gingers? Just curious.

Posted 113 days ago.

Tiredofit, everything is racist to people who have race stuck in their brain.

Posted 113 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or