Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
21 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

I agree that 75 of 77 self described climate experts (per question #9) said man had significant role in climate change, if you concede that greenhouse gas was not even mentioned. So therefore there is no basis for saying this study supports current theory.

Posted 220 days ago.

luvthesouth

some interesting numbers concerning CO2. currently it is estimated that the worlds forests absorb 40-50% of the worlds total man-made extra CO2 produced by burning carbon based fuels. although what we produce is a small percentage compared to what the earth naturally produces, the extra CO2 that we produce can't be totally absorbed naturally. if the numbers are correct then it is evident that we either need to increase the number of trees, reduce our carbon output or choose a variant of both. personally i choose the latter if not for any reason other than i like trees.

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

Ok so to recap, there is nothing to support 97% of scientists agree that greenhouse gas is changing our climate?

Posted 220 days ago.

harryanderson

On CO2,

As Kendall pointed out earlier...

...even Richard Lindzen, whom the arch-conservative Weekly Standard gleefully dubbed the “all-around scourge of James Hansen, Bill McKibben, Al Gore, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and sundry other climate ‘alarmists,’” is convinced anthropogenic CO2 warms the earth.

The Weekly Standard reports:

“The burning of oil, gas, and especially coal pumps carbon dioxide and other gases into the atmosphere, where they allow the sun’s heat to penetrate to the Earth’s surface but impede its escape, thus causing the lower atmosphere and the Earth’s surface to warm. Essentially everybody, Lindzen included, agrees.”

htt p://ww w.weeklystandard.co m/articles/what-catastrophe_773268.html?page=1

Essentially everybody agrees.

Essentially everybody agrees.

Posted 220 days ago.

harryanderson

You’re right. It seems I need to read my own statements more carefully before attempting to answer!

I need to amend my later statement so that it’s consistent with the earlier, and write, “I’ve cited 2 studies to support my contention that 97% of climate scientists agree man’s activities are altering the climate.”

Greenhouse gases are another issue. Do you now wish to go into whether CO2 and some other gases, when added to ambient air, trap heat? We can do that if you like.

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

Wow

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

In future I would recommend you remember what you just posted

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

I’ve cited 2 studies to support my contention that 97% of climate scientists agree greenhouse gases are altering the climate. YOU POSTED THIS A FEW MINUTES AGO

Posted 220 days ago.

harryanderson

And it wasn’t I who brought up CO2 and greenhouse gases 2 days ago when you first took issue with my “97%” comment.

I’ll repeat my comment for your convience.

Ithink wrote, “I’ll leave that to the loons.”

I replied, “I’ll leave it to the 97% of all climate scientists who agree that mankind’s activities are causing climate change.”

In the future, I believe you would benefit if you read more carefully before attempting to answer.

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

Was there one of the other questions that supports you assertion that 97% of scientists agree that greenhouse gas is changing the climate?

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

Reluctant to admit that it does not support your contention?

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

Was there any of the questions that addressed greenhouse gas?

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

Yes I am aware but the 97% claim was bases on number 2. I can post the rest of the questions if you like.

Posted 220 days ago.

harryanderson

I also suspect you didn't read the Doran study before posting. Otherwise you should have known the study contained “up to nine questions.”

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

Again I ask, how does this support your claim that 97% of scientists agree that greenhouse gas is changing climate?

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

I will concede that 75 of 77 self described climatologists answered yes to the second question of you concede that co2 nor any greenhouse gas was mentioned.

Posted 220 days ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit, Sometimes I suspect you reply before reading my posts. Otherwise, you would have known that…

1. I didn’t cite a “cook study.”

2. I pointed out that you didn’t cite any study of climate researchers.

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

Care to enlighten we deniers how you made that leap?

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

How is that as you say an endorsement of your greenhouse theory?

Posted 220 days ago.

Tiredofit

Q1: “When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?”   76 of 79 (96.2%) answered “risen.”

Q2: “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures?”   75 of 77 (97.4%) answered “yes.” 

Posted 220 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or