Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 minute ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

All very true, Stillhere.

The article about Coleman is out new today. I know he has been discussed before. He says no warming in over 18 years.

Good talking to you. Gonna take a break.

Posted 3 days ago.

Stillhere

Lindzen featured in CBS News: 'The opportunities for taxation, for policies, for control, for crony capitalism are just immense, you can see their eyes bulge. Even many of the people who are supportive of sounding the global warning alarm, back off from catastophism. It’s the politicians and the green movement that like to portray catastrophe.'

Posted 3 days ago.

Stillhere

MIT Climate Scientist Dr. Richard Lindzen: ‘The changes that have occurred due to global warning are too small to account for’ – ‘Global warming, climate change, are just a dream come true for politicians’

Posted 3 days ago.

Stillhere

Yes ITHINK, notice the veneer of niceness is wearing off and Harry gets snarkier by the week.

Watching the scam fall apart is not easy.

Posted 3 days ago.

harryanderson

Well, Stillhere, I see you refuse to ackowledge the contradictions in your own statements.

At least Dr. Lindzen, unlike you, acknowledges some of the major mistakes he's made. The NYT reported:

"Dr. Lindzen acknowledged that the 2009 paper contained 'some stupid mistakes' in his handling of the satellite data. 'It was just embarrassing,' he said in an interview. 'The technical details of satellite measurements are really sort of grotesque.'”

h ttp://w ww.nytimes.c om/2012/05/01/science/earth/clouds-effect-on-climate-change-is-last-bastion-for-dissenters.html?pagewanted=3&_r=0

Stillhere, you seem ignorant of.basic attribution principles, so I wonder if your info came from the research that Dr. Lindzen said contains "embarrassing" "stupid mistakes."

Posted 3 days ago.

The Canadians are having a little excitement today. Our time will come. Before G W gets us.

Posted 3 days ago.

You mean he will keep on trying to scare us with his wisdom about the sky falling? Oh shoot.

Posted 3 days ago.

Stillhere

Our LOCAL PRO SCIENCE REPUBLICAN will be ok, don't worry.

Posted 3 days ago.

Stillhere

Not to worry ITHINK, there are some republicans that have bought into the nonsense too.

He always has his phony consensus to keep him WARM at night

The 97% consensus – a lie of epic proportions

Anthony Watts / May 17, 2013

Posted 3 days ago.

I feel so sorry for poor harry. It has to be soooo upsetting that his fellow republicans say his pet theory is a lie. I am sure he values the opinions of his fellow republicans and is hurt by this. lol

Posted 3 days ago.

Stillhere

ITHINK they cannot do that, its their reason for being.

Posted 3 days ago.

It's over, Stillhere. The warmers should stop embarrassing themselves and slink back in to their hole.

Posted 3 days ago.

Stillhere

ITHINK as Dr Lindzen says

Once the issue is adopted, evidence becomes irrelevant

Posted 3 days ago.

h ttp://w ww.express.co.uk/news/nature/526191

"Climate-change-is-a-lie-global-warming-not-real-claims-weather-channel-founder

Climate change PROVED to be 'nothing but a lie', claims top meteorologist THE debate about climate change is finished - because it has been categorically proved NOT to exist, one of the world's leading meteorologists has claimed"

Posted 3 days ago.

Stillhere

MIT climatologist Dr Lindzen also talks about the pause Their excuse for the absence of warming over the past 17 years is that the heat is hiding in the deep ocean. However, this is simply an admission that the models fail to simulate the exchanges of heat between the surface layers and the deeper oceans. However, it is this heat transport that plays a major role in natural internal variability of climate, and the IPCC assertions that observed warming can be attributed to man depend crucially on their assertion that these models accurately simulate natural internal variability. Thus, they now, somewhat obscurely, admit that their crucial assumption was totally unjustified.

Posted 3 days ago.

"John Coleman, who co-founded the Weather Channel, shocked academics by insisting the theory of man-made climate change was no longer scientifically credible.

Instead, what 'little evidence' there is for rising global temperatures points to a 'natural phenomenon' within a developing eco-system.

In an open letter attacking the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, he wrote: "The ocean is not rising significantly.

"The polar ice is increasing, not melting away. Polar Bears are increasing in number.

"Heat waves have actually diminished, not increased. There is not an uptick in the number or strength of storms (in fact storms are diminishing).

"I have studied this topic seriously for years. It has become a political and environment agenda item, but the science is not valid."

Posted 3 days ago.

harryanderson

It's amazing, Stillhere, that you avoid your own posts. So are you now saying that global warming ISN'T heating the top ocean?

Are you disavowing your former statement that global warming CONTINUES to heat the ocean?

Posted 3 days ago.

Stillhere

Dr Richard Lindzen MIT climatologist agrees with my position

Climate alarm belongs to a class of issues characterized by a claim for which there is no evidence( this is what I have asked for numerous times without receiving any), that nonetheless appeals strongly to one or more interests or prejudices( yes those of the socialist big govt bent are the ones that push this). Once the issue is adopted, evidence becomes irrelevant.(exactly DR, we see that here all the time) Instead, the believer sees what he believes. Anything can serve as a supporting omen ( again correct DR drought, rain, cold, heat its all a sign)

Parenthesis are my words of course

Posted 3 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Besides the MIT climatologist is probably working off a government grant and therefore the research is skewed !

Posted 3 days ago.

Ohwiseone

More inconvenient facts that the tiredbrain troll doesn't like !Is there a scientific consensus on global warming?~~~~~~~ YES , that's so !!

www dot skepticalscience dot com/global-warming-scientific-c~~~~The tiredbrain troll doesn't like inconvenient facts !Those facts make it look ,stupid , foolish , ignorant , right-wing whack job , You pick which ever you think fits ! Or add your own !

Posted 3 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or