Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 days ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

True or False Tiredofit.

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

True or false Tiredofit?

You are just on here for a cheap laugh by jerking peoples chains?

Posted 71 days ago.

Ohwiseone

I've presented a study that wasn't funded by our government that states climate change is happening and man has a role in it ! Now why don't you present your "FACTS" that you are so very proud of ! Oh wait , YOU DONT HAVE ANY !!!

Posted 71 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Prove to me that this study is biased ! Just one fact , that's all I ask for !!! I didn't think so !

Posted 71 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And tiredbrain the question still is :Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ???? Since you all are holding to the official Faux news line-o crap I would like to see the facts you're working from !

Posted 71 days ago.

Kendall78

"Notice how the topic is ME"

What an ego. Actually oh self centered one, the topic is about climate change that you don't seem willing to discuss. We keep trying to compromise with you like adults by asking what your criteria is for "proof" but you won't just tell us.

Please define what you would consider proof and we would try to supply it. Is it so hard?

Posted 71 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Qustion is , why here of all the world , why here ?

Posted 71 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Like I said ,"just a Canadian troll" !!!

Posted 71 days ago.

mythravere

And you are right it is pitiful. To actually want to spend all this time messing around with people instead of engaging in a good debate about an issue that affects us all isn't healthy.

But it all comes down to personal integrity. A person of good integrity has no issue with admitting when they don't understand something or that they were wrong about something.

Heck I admitted to a learning disability in math and Tiredofit uses it against me to fling mud on me.

Good thing I don't mind getting muddy!

Posted 71 days ago.

mythravere

Those two questions made pretty clear his motivations for posting on here.

And sure can bet that those two questions will be posted after his posts until he answers them.

Its funny though that if he truthfully has honest intentions by participating in this little debate...it should be easy to answer those questions.

It just goes to show his intentions aren't good ones.

Posted 71 days ago.

Kendall78

Lol...he is unable to answer those questions Myth.

He doesn't even know what a "fact" or "proof" is. It would be sad if it wasn't so pitiful.

Posted 71 days ago.

Kendall78

"and the temperature stayed flat."

Ummm..no they didn't. Go crack open a book other than a comic Tired.

Posted 71 days ago.

mythravere

True or False Tiredofit.

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

True or false Tiredofit?

You are just on here for a cheap laugh by jerking peoples chains?

Posted 72 days ago.

mythravere

Yep I seen that. Its no surprise the reaction it gets from the deniers though.

Its all natural they say. The warming. Ok why is that so.... crickets.

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

To save search time if you want to look at the results: w w w.wmo.int/pages/mediacentre/press_releases/pr_1002_en.h t m l

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

Hey Myth, did you see the latest results from World Meteorological Organization? They said that the "amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere reached a new record high in 2013."

It's funny how deniers always claim that the warm up is natural and not bad but then will look at a very unnatural rise in greenhouse gases and shrug like it's ok.

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

How do define "fact" Tired?

How do you define "proof" Tired.

It's perfectly logical to ask these questions because why should one waste time giving what is generally considered to be proof and facts, if the person you are giving them to does not recognize them as facts or proof.

So if you are actually interested in learning something, tell us your definitions so we may cater to your "special" needs.

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

"Who gives a*****what I think"

HAHAHA...best line of the night. Thanks Tired.

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

"If you wish to completely change our energy system.."

Whoever aid that? Unless I am mistaken, most people on here have decided a nice smooth transition would be preferable. It would give society a chance to change gradually.

For some reason the deniers have this idea that people want to literally scrap the entire energy system in a span of less than a year.

Posted 72 days ago.

mythravere

True or False Tiredofit.

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

Posted 72 days ago.

Kendall78

"were you not the one who said you would not provide proof:? why are you now asking"

Because I am curious in how you define "proof". It must be after some manner no rational person would come up with, so I thought I would ask.

So, how do you define proof?

Will you accept research from the govt?

Will you accept research from universities?

Will you accept research from scientists that get grants?

Posted 72 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or