Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 hours ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

Ok Tiredofit. If god exists where is he?

And as a bonus question. Can you prove that gods other than the one you believe do not exist themselves?

Posted 17 days ago.

Ohwiseone

This isn't going away tiredbrain ! Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ?Pretty easy so why do you delay ? Because you are obviously spouting the right-wings talking points so why not admit it !

Posted 17 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Here you go tiredbrain , research that is not funded by our government !

Posted 17 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia

Posted 17 days ago.

harryanderson

Since reducing our use of fossil fuels is desirable for a number of reasons, what do you think of the revenue-neutral carbon tax proposals?

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

AGAIN, can anyone provide ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man is causing a change in the climate>>>????? JUST ONE>

Posted 17 days ago.

Ohwiseone

We have given you several and you refuse them , now please answer the question! Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ?Pretty easy so why do you delay ? Because you are obviously spouting the right-wings talking points so why not admit it !

Posted 17 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Those proportions come from a look at Fox News coverage of climate change in 2013, when UCS found 50 segments to examine for accuracy. Of those, 72 percent “included misleading portrayals of the science." The breakdown goes further than the network-wide coverage, delivering a sharp elbow to one of the Erik Wemple Blog’s favorite shows on cable news:www ,ucsusa. org/scienceorspin

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

AGAIN, can anyone provide ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man is causing a change in the climate>>>????? JUST ONE>

Posted 17 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Still avoiding the answer aren't you tiredbrain ? Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ?Pretty easy so why do you delay ? Because you are obviously spouting the right-wings talking points so why not admit it !

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

AGAIN, can anyone provide ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man is causing a change in the climate>>>????? JUST ONE>

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

The socialist are really pushing hard as they are on the edge of losing power

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

Hillary doubles down on the lie,Clinton told the audience that climate change is “the most consequential, urgent, sweeping collection of challenges we face as a nation and a world.” REALLY:::

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

Since when is science over>? What he means is shut up, stop doubting,

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

Even our Socialist president says the debate is over, Really>>>>????

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

So you see, logical questions are greeted with hostility not only on this little forum but in the greater debate in General

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

We had one attempt, he claimed the earth had warmned a an unprecedented rate over the last 150 years. Now when I asked what the warming rate was 12000 years ago, (last ice age) He takes his ball and walks off pouting. Why is that an unreasonable question, if one is going to claim UNPRECIDENTED shouldn't he have data older than 150yrs

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

SO a new day, a new challenge. CAN ANYONE GIVE A SINGLE PROVABLE FACT SHOWING MAN IS CHANGING THE CLIMATE>? #NOPROOF

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

I could put these statements in one paragraph but I know some people like my twitter style posts #NOPROOF

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

People like Michael Mann, cook and AL GORE are activists not scientists.

Posted 17 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or