Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 hours ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

We see that the correlation between CO2 and temperature is no more significant today than it was ages back when there were no automobiles and industry. The author also goes into the effects of the ocean and sunspots. Lansner's conclusion is that CO2 rises do not cause the temperature rises, but follows them – "The well known Temperature-CO2 relation with temperature as a driver of CO2 is easily shown."

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

New Evidence That Man-Made Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Does Not Cause Global Warming

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

Global climate changes have been far more intense (12 to 20 times as intense in some cases) than the global warming of the past century, and they took place in as little as 20–100 years. Global warming of the past century (0.8° C) is virtually insignificant when compared to the magnitude of at least 10 global climate changes in the past 15,000 years. None of these sudden global climate changes could possibly have been caused by human CO2 input to the atmosphere because they all took place long before anthropogenic CO2 emissions began. The cause of the ten earlier ‘natural’ climate changes was most likely the same as the cause of global warming from 1977 to 1998.

Posted 17 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Also, Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ???? Are you ashamed ??

Posted 17 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Look it up for yourself !Not funded by the USA and reaches the same conclusions that most other researchers have found !Deny , deflect and lie, lie, lie ! A true republican talking head !

Posted 17 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Here you go tiredbrain ,ONE MORE TIME !!! research that is not funded by our government ! ~~~~The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

You have no proof.

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

An inconvenient truth for the church of Algore

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

Sorry but it's true

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

FACT

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

Co2.levels still climb, warming stopped nearly two decades ago

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

There simply is NO PROOF that co2.causes climate change.

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

But all the stooges are wound up, lol. See how hostile they are to those that don't worship at the altar of Algore.

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

You can claim that you have proof but you dont. You have belief

Posted 17 days ago.

Tiredofit

Still no proof??? What was the rate of warming 12000 years ago?

Posted 17 days ago.

mythravere

I'll repeat what I said earlier.

There is no point in showing you the proof. No matter how right it is you can't admit that it is right because you can't allow us to be right on this issue.

Posted 17 days ago.

mythravere

"Lol so you and Kendall claim to have proof but won't share it lol."

Why does it sound ridiculous? Its exactly what you are doing.

Posted 17 days ago.

Kendall78

"claim to have proof but won't share it lol."

It's right there for the taking Tired. But if you want it to be spoonfed to you...again....I'll make a deal with you.

You provide the proof to your arguments, and then I will repost the proof for mine.

Posted 17 days ago.

harryanderson

It's absurd to try to prove something to someone who won't consider the forms of evidence everybody else, including the courts and the Congress, uses to make decisions.

To someone who has repeatedly tried to belittle the other posters here.

It's absurd to offer scientific proof to someone who has declared, "This is not a scientific debate."

Posted 17 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Now lets talk about this research from the land down under !

Posted 17 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or