Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
18 minutes ago.
by Tiredofit
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

harryanderson

You ask if the hockey stick graph is inaccurate, but you already cited strong evidence that it is.

As you quoted, the hockey stick graph "was supported by more than two dozen reconstructions, using various statistical methods and combinations of proxy records."

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

How is that proof of Man made climate change???

Posted 15 days ago.

harryanderson

Since 2/3 of my fellow Republicans and Republican-leaning independents agree it's beneficial to reduce our fossil fuel use, I've moved on to figuring out how best to do that.

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

cited the following reconstructions supporting its conclusion that the 1990s was likely to have been the warmest Northern Hemisphere decade for 1,000 years:[2

IS LIKELY THE SAME AS PROOF

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

Sorry if I ask questions but this IS your source

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

I am QUOTING YOUR SOURCE

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

Has the HOCKEY STICK been show to be inaccurate?

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

Quantitative reconstructions have consistently shown earlier temperatures below the temperature levels reached in the late 20th century. This pattern as seen in Mann, Bradley & Hughes 1999 was dubbed the hockey stick graph, and as of 2010 this broad conclusion was supported by more than two dozen reconstructions, using various statistical methods and combinations of proxy records, with variations in how flat the pre-20th century "shaft" appears.[1]

Posted 15 days ago.

harryanderson

I knew you'd reject the 43 papers without looking at them.

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

.

The instrumental temperature record only covers the last 150 years at a hemispheric or global scale, and reconstructions of earlier periods are based on climate proxies

HMMM climate proxies are those factual?

Posted 15 days ago.

harryanderson

I'm on to solutions.

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

WIKIPEDIA? is that not open to anyone to author???

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

OK 2000 years is one thing but how about 12000

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

Boy, go to bed, you had your chance.

Posted 15 days ago.

harryanderson

"If the rate of warming is unprecedented as you state, that would be some level of proof that something is different about this warming trend, Please show where this data is"

Here's a list of 43 scientific papers showing the recent warming is unprecedented in the last 2000 years.

en.wikipedia****/wiki/List_of_large-scale_temperature_reconstructions_of_the_last_2,000_years

I know you won't bother to look at this scientific data, since you've said it's not a scientific debate.

Posted 15 days ago.

Kendall78

"how was this data gathered from 12000 years ago"

It must have came from the same place that told you what didn't happen back then..haha.

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

how was this data gathered from 12000 years ago

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

If the rate of warming is unprecedented as you state, that would be some level of proof that something is different about this warming trend, Please show where this data is

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

Kendall you had your chance, hush boy

Posted 15 days ago.

Kendall78

"TELL ME WHERE"

You mean after all these years...after all the times people have shown you...you have no idea where to look up the info or how?

Are you that stupid? I mean really..are you that mentally deficient?

Posted 15 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or