Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
43 minutes ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

harryanderson

The purpose is to shut down rational debate.

Posted 48 days ago.

mythravere

Neutral sources will be the only proof that is considered.

You've dumped a heck of a lot of "proof" from rightwing sources on here.

Sorry but thats just not gonna cut it.

And more importantly its easy to ascertain the manner in which you conducted your "research". You just hopped around copy and pasting from whatever you thought had something to say that supports your cause.

Posted 48 days ago.

Kendall78

What would you consider to count as proof Tired?

Posted 48 days ago.

Kendall78

"You asked for research that is meaningful and that was provided"

No, it wasn't provided. This was neither research or meaningful. It was copy/paste from various less than savory source material.

Posted 49 days ago.

Ohwiseone

All one must do is look to the history of one James Taylor and see what type of "contributer" he is ! All the articles he's posted for forbes have been of the right-wing agenda !So why don't you just ask Rush or Sean , it would be the same !

Posted 49 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia

Posted 49 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Yes maybe but that changes nothing ! You asked for research that is meaningful and that was provided !And yet you still deflect and deny and refuse to answer ~~ Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ????

Posted 49 days ago.

Kendall78

Wow...look at all the copy/paste from Tired. Without much in the way of citations I might add.

Posted 49 days ago.

Ohwiseone

By the way , Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ???? Are you ashamed ??

Posted 49 days ago.

Ohwiseone

HMMMm looks like the debate IS over.You now have proof

Posted 49 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Go ahead and fill pages with your idiotic droning ! Deny , deflect all you want but there it is in black and white !

Posted 49 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Here is the research you deny exists ! !!! research that is not funded by our government ! ~~~~The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia

Posted 49 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Also, Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ???? Are you ashamed ??

Posted 49 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Look it up for yourself !Not funded by the USA and reaches the same conclusions that most other researchers have found !Deny , deflect and lie, lie, lie ! A true republican talking head !

Posted 49 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Here you go tiredbrain ,ONE MORE TIME !!! research that is not funded by our government ! ~~~~The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia

Posted 49 days ago.

mythravere

I'll repeat what I said earlier.

There is no point in showing you the proof. No matter how right it is you can't admit that it is right because you can't allow us to be right on this issue.

Posted 49 days ago.

mythravere

"Lol so you and Kendall claim to have proof but won't share it lol."

Why does it sound ridiculous? Its exactly what you are doing.

Posted 49 days ago.

Kendall78

"claim to have proof but won't share it lol."

It's right there for the taking Tired. But if you want it to be spoonfed to you...again....I'll make a deal with you.

You provide the proof to your arguments, and then I will repost the proof for mine.

Posted 49 days ago.

harryanderson

It's absurd to try to prove something to someone who won't consider the forms of evidence everybody else, including the courts and the Congress, uses to make decisions.

To someone who has repeatedly tried to belittle the other posters here.

It's absurd to offer scientific proof to someone who has declared, "This is not a scientific debate."

Posted 49 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Now lets talk about this research from the land down under !

Posted 49 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or