Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

It really doesn't matter what you show tiredbrain , it will only seek to lie and mis-lead !Former union steward my arse !

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

"Peer-Reviewed Survey Finds Majority Of Scientists Skeptical Of Global Warming Crisis"

Why do you believe opinion writer James Taylor over real Climate Scientists Tired?

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

"NASA/NOAA Corruption Of The Northern Hemisphere Temperature Record"

Why do you believe a Geologist/electrical engineer over actual Climate Scientists Tired?

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

"Socialism and global planning essential Pete Mason"

So Tired, you believe a Socialist over Climate Scientists?

This says a lot about you. As long as a person seems to support your point of view...you love them.

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

"David Evans is a scientist."

Tell us Tired why we should believe someone with an Electrical Engineering degree over a Climate Scientist?

Ol Dave also founded Goldnerds that has to do with Gold Investing. Hey, we might have seen him or his group in commercials on Fox News then. They love gold investing commercials there.

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

"David Evans is a scientist."

Tell us Tired why we should believe someone with an Electrical Engineering degree over a Climate Scientist?

Ol Dave also founded Goldnerds that has to do with Gold Investing. Hey, we might have seen him or his group in commercials on Fox News then. They love gold investing commercials there.

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

Keep trying Tired, eventually you will learn how to cite information that is relevant to the discussion.

How about you stop copy/pasting titles of articles that appeal to you and actually read them and find important snippets to share with everyone.

Can you do that? Oh..I bet you can.

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

Sorry Tired...none of what you cited had any real facts or data...just politically driven nonsense. Not to mention 15 years out of date.

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

"The Coming Revelation Of The 'Global Warming' Fraud Resembles The Obamacare Lie"

Why should we believe Peter Ferrara Tired?

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

(From the BBC) "Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere between 2012 and 2013 grew at their fastest rate since 1984."

"The WMO's annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin doesn't measure emissions from power station smokestacks but instead records how much of the warming gases remain in the atmosphere after the complex interactions that take place between the air, the land and the oceans."

""The climate system is not linear, it is not straightforward. It is not necessarily reflected in the temperature in the atmosphere, but if you look at the temperature profile in the ocean, the heat is going in the oceans," said Oksana Tarasova, chief of the atmospheric research division at the WMO."

What are your issues with this scientist's findings Tired?

Do you disagree with them?

Do you have some data that counters their findings?

Are you just a twit?

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

"in fact no warming for nearly two decades"

"...but if you look at the temperature profile in the ocean, the heat is going in the oceans," said Oksana Tarasova, chief of the atmospheric research division at the WMO."

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

"Climate Scientist:"

What scientist?

You?

Some guy down the street?

Who? Do you even know?

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

I am not dissuaded in my skepticism by your begging.

Gimme this...gimme that..gimme gimme gimme.

What are you...on intellectual welfare or something?

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

"if you cannot make your case then say so"

What is "your" case Tired?

And when are you going to make it?

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

(From the BBC) "Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere between 2012 and 2013 grew at their fastest rate since 1984."

"The WMO's annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin doesn't measure emissions from power station smokestacks but instead records how much of the warming gases remain in the atmosphere after the complex interactions that take place between the air, the land and the oceans."

""The climate system is not linear, it is not straightforward. It is not necessarily reflected in the temperature in the atmosphere, but if you look at the temperature profile in the ocean, the heat is going in the oceans," said Oksana Tarasova, chief of the atmospheric research division at the WMO."

What are your issues with this scientist's findings Tired?

Do you disagree with them?

Do you have some data that counters their findings?

Are you just a twit?

Posted 47 days ago.

Kendall78

I se not citations, facts, data or anything relevant from Tired.

It does seem that he hopes to twitter away the topic by burying it under a lot of short, insulting, irrelevant, ego stroking drivel though.

Posted 47 days ago.

harryanderson

If you want proof CO2 is a greenhouse gas, take it up with scientists like Judith Curry and Roy Spencer who say it is. Write your own scientific paper.

Posted 47 days ago.

harryanderson

The personal attack is all you have, and you go back to it again and again.

Posted 47 days ago.

harryanderson

"But you cannot, Larry Moe, Curly and SHemp you all fail and it frustrates you"

Why must you always revert to the name-calling? Could it be because, like Joe Bast said, "The scientific debate is a source of enormous frustration" to you?

Kendall and I cite a climate scientist, and you come back with some drivel about the Three Stooges.

You still haven't explained why you should "not necessarily" be held liable for causing someone breathing problems.

Posted 47 days ago.

harryanderson

So, you see,

Pointing to the scientific debate only increases his frustration. He can't even accept that CO2 is a greenhouse, which was proven back in 1896 and is accepted even by the 3% of climate science who don't think CO2 poses significant risks. Even Roy Spencer and Judith Curry admit CO2 is a greenhouse gas. They disagree on the severity of its impact.

But Tiredofit hasn't even admitted that its a greenhouse gas.

Posted 47 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or