Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 days ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

And just so you know tired of it. The question of whether or not Co2 is indeed a heat trapping gas is testable even by folks like you and me.

Four plexiglas boxes and some co2 and o2 is all you need. Plus some temperature sensors.

I'd go into detail on how to do it but I gotta feeling you could care less.

Posted 232 days ago.

mythravere

"Harry I don't need to prove a thing to you"

I have told others on here that if you have the facts to back up your claims you have nothing to fear in putting those facts on the table.

Anyone that makes a claim and will not back it up is being dishonest.

Simple as that.

Posted 232 days ago.

harryanderson

“Since you cannot prove that there is a God and that the earth was formed in 6 days, and we all came from Adam and Eve I will say your belief is without merit as well.”

I didn’t ask you to believe these things. If you say that my belief “that there is a God” is “without merit,” you certainly have the right to do so!

My belief in God is a matter of faith. Matters of faith aren’t based on evidence, just as your belief that ““funding is dependent (sic) on those findings” is a matter of faith.

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

Is this some twisted attempt to go out into the digital mission fields and help us poor hillbillies?

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

Really Harry, isn't there some local paper that has a forum for you to post you sage and Godly advice? Perhaps you consider it your duty to minister to the lowly West Virginians. Is that it?

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

What a fraud you are Harry.

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

Someone that believes the human race comes from Adam and Eve demands scientific proof> HOW IRONIC>

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

That's fine, you have no more proof that there is a cause and effect of the warming hysteria. Since you cannot prove that there is a God and that the earth was formed in 6 days, and we all came from Adam and Eve I will say your belief is without merit as well.

Posted 232 days ago.

harryanderson

True. You don't have to prove a thing to me.

Since you can't (or won't) provide evidence to support your claim, I'm at liberty to judge that no evidence supports your claim, and that said claim is unworthy of serious consideration.

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

Thanks for looking past the syntax, its big of you

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

Have you read the leaked emails

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry I don't need to prove a thing to you, can you prove the world was created I six days? Thought not.

Posted 232 days ago.

harryanderson

“Harry can you prove they are not?” Of course not. I’m fully aware that it’s futile to try and prove a negative. That’s why I made no such claim. I can’t back it up.

You, on the other hand. did make a claim. You claimed that the “majority of government funded researchers who funding is dependant on those findings.”

Looking past the syntax, I take that to mean that you’re claiming the majority of government-funded climate researchers, in order to receive further grants, must find that humans are causing significant climate change.

Is that what you’re claiming? If not, what are you claiming? If so, can you back up that claim with evidence?

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

I have read the emails about suppressing deserting views have you?

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry can you prove they are not? So just where are you posting from again?

Posted 232 days ago.

harryanderson

“…majority of government funded researchers who funding is dependant on those findings.”

But you’ve already admitted, Tiredofit, that you can cite no climate science grants that are tied to results.

We dealt with this 127 days ago on the “Okay, gun fetish…” thread. At that time, you posted the following: “No one give grants with a condition attached as far as I know, but they do invest in research that has an outcome they like.”

So how can you now say “funding is dependent (sic) on those findings”?

Do you have new information that you didn’t have 127 days ago?

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

Lets try this, the propaganda campaign of the majority of government funded researchers who funding is dependant on those findings.

Posted 232 days ago.

harryanderson

I told you once that I would no longer employ the phrase “anti-science propaganda campaign,” Tiredofit. I certainly didn’t mean to offend you when I used it.

Maybe I should have called it “the propaganda campaign to discredit the conclusions of almost all the climate scientists who publish on the issue.”

It’s a bit wordy, but it may have been considered inoffensive. I’m all for trying to avoid giving offense.

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

I take great issue with the title of this thread. If Harry had omitted the word anti-science, perhaps I would not have had to point out his anti-science views, but that is water under the bridge now

Posted 232 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry is hypocritical in his views and I point that out, it is not I that calls people azzhole one phuck, that would be you. You have no room to criticize but that won't impede you I am sure. You seem to feel the need to categorize people to make it easier to focus your resentment against them.

Posted 232 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or