Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
126 days ago.
by slinky
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

You dimwit. LOL! I guess this is where I need to tell you that I was in your camp not too long ago.

I didn't believe man had a role in it. And I vehemently argued that point on these very threads and forums before you were ever on hear.

I've been posting on here since 2007 maybe even back in 2006. Something like that.

So I have represented both side of this debate.

I realized I was wrong.

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

Honestly I don't hate the right. I hate their insanity.

People like you don't help that.

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

Oh god you ******* dumbass.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here that since squirrels live in trees and areas with lots of plants and such. I am betting their meager output of co2 is taken up by the plants in their local environment before it can harm the climate. Not that they could anyways.

So I guess I just played your game again.

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

Nah. What this whole thing boils down to is that you hate anyone who you perceive as not being in the same camp as you. And that revolves around people political inclinations.

You see all of us as part of the vast left wing conspiracy.

Therefor you can not allow us to be right about anything we say and that is why you play these little games on here the way you do.

Thats it straight and simple.

There is no other explanation to why you conduct yourself in the manner you do on these forums.

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

Your thoughts are the same throughout all of the posts.

The problem with you is that no fact can be laid on the table that you won't reject.

You're just a worthless troll. And thats it.

You don't care about the debate on this issue.

We've offered gobs of information.

Meh? You just reject it.

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

Squirrels also have no role in changing the climate.

I agree with that comment.

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

Also. Another thing. You aren't so stupid that you don't realize that its best to keep your trap shut and not put any facts on the table because if you do then they would be up for scrutiny by the rest of us.

And I would lay a 500 bucks on the table that is exactly why you won't pony up why you are right.

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

Failure to share those details will mean that you aren't interested in said debate. It means you have other goals.

And what honestly could be the benefit of calling us out on being in error in regards to our beliefs on climate change and then flat out refusing to offer the evidence that proves us wrong?

You don't want to see action taken on this issue right? Then why leave people operating under a false belief about that issue?

What it boils down to is that you're just on here to stir*****and nothing else.

Because if you had the facts well then by god I bet you just pour them onto the table.

But you don't. Which most certainly means you are just talking out of your rear on this issue and understands nothing about.

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

And so you know its not about proving man DOESN'T cause climate change. Its taking those facts the tell you man has no role in it and sharing those.

Like I said. If you are attempting to be an honest participant in this debate then you will share those details.

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

You're biggest piece of*****idiot I have ever seen. Jesus Christ how do go through life being so danged ****tard stupid?

Its real simple Tiredofit. You say we are wrong and you are right. Therefor your position being the one that harbors the truth should have the facts back up said truth.

Its really that simple. If you are right and I am wrong then the facts and information should line up in your favor.

And if you honestly care about this issue then you should have no problem sharing those facts that prove us wrong WITH US.

DEE DEE DEE!

Posted 694 days ago.

harryanderson

Actually, the percentage of respondents who thought we "should take action to reduce climate change" was a little lower than 64%.

Half the respondents were asked question A, and the other half were asked question B. Of one group, 64% agreed. Of the other 60% agreed.

A slight difference indeed, but we should point it out. Accuracy is important.

Posted 694 days ago.

harryanderson

I believe we'll see more Republicans proposing conservative solutions to global warming.

I'm hopeful because, as Bloomberg News reports, "In stark contrast to their party's public stance on Capitol Hill, many Republicans privately acknowledge the scientific consensus that human activity is at least partially responsible for climate change and recognize the need to address the problem."

ww w.bloomberg.co m/news/2014-08-15/many-republicans-privately-support-action-on-climate.html

The left would like to use this issue to implement their big-government agenda. We must fight for our own solutions. Too many Republican leaders are fighting against the Republicans who "recognize the need to address the problem."

That's 64% of them. According to a poll from Yale, 64% of Republicans and Republican leaning independents think we "should take steps to address climate change."

environment.yale.edu/climate-communication/files/Republican_Views_on_Climate_Change.pdf

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

I mean if you seriously cared out this issue you divulge all you know that proves you are right.

Lol. You probably show this thread to your friends so that can see how you are getting our goats so to speak.

The thing is if that were true...man what a pathetic existence you and your friends share.

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

In other words what you do is akin to walking into a room and lifting your leg and cranking out a great big stinker.

Just a stupid troll is all you are.

You must have a boring life.

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

Hey Tiredofit since what we believe is a hoax (not) then it'd be pretty hard to prove anything without any facts to back it up right?

But that must mean that what you believe has hard evidence backing it up.

Care to share that info?

Of course not.

But you would if you were honestly opposed to this issue.

You see right there demonstrates your reasoning for chiming in on this issue.

You are just trying to get a rise out of everyone else while they honestly try and talk about this issue.

Posted 694 days ago.

Kendall78

Well if you don't have evidence about the experiment, why are you ranting so much?

Posted 694 days ago.

Kendall78

"Where is the evidence?"

That's what I'm asking you for Tired but you keep deflecting from giving any. You basically say the experiment is wrong but you offer no proof why it is.

You say that global warming is part of a natural cycle but yet you offer no proof to back that assertion up.

What's wrong with you anyway?

Posted 694 days ago.

Kendall78

I'm just wondering if you have ever tried the experiment or not. Do you rely on emperical data or truthiness?

Posted 694 days ago.

Kendall78

Oh Tired, no proof to back up anything you have said. Try the experiment and see if it works or not.

Posted 694 days ago.

mythravere

Besides just opening the jar could let in trace gases from you local environment that could skew the results of the experiment.

You making fun of that shows that you have little understanding of the precision needed to obtain accurate results.

Posted 695 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or