Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 hours ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

So a physicist, who is not a climate scientist, goes into full denial mode with no facts.

You know that the "nah" argument isn't really an argument at all.

Posted 68 days ago.

"Oregon-based physicist Gordon Fulks sums it up well: “CO2 is said to be responsible for global warming that is not occurring, for accelerated sea-level rise that is not occurring, for net glacial and sea ice melt that is not occurring . . . and for increasing extreme weather that is not occurring.”

h ttp://nypost.c om/2014/09/14/leo-v-science-vanishing-evidence-for-climate-change/

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

At this stage of the debate (if one would call it that), no one can give you proof you would accept Tired.

That's why we want you to tell us what you would consider proof. Here are some examples:

Educational Sources

Govt Sources

Pubished works by scientists from fields related to climate

Would you accept any of these sources as proof? A simple yes or no would be good enough.

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

"and to define it."

So you will accept whatever difinition we give?

And btw, you are asking us for something, we merely are wanting to clarify what that something is to make certain you get what want. No point in wasting even more time with "proof" that doesn't meet your criteria after all right?

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

We will provide all the "proof" you need when you define what you consider proof.

Once you do that, then I am certain it will be provided for you. Why are you so stubborn on this?

Posted 69 days ago.

mythravere

Oh yea Tiredofit. You know what the difference between a livable biosphere for a given species and a biosphere that won't support the given species life?

A few degrees in temperature. Also acidity in the case of corals.

Posted 69 days ago.

mythravere

"GOT PROOF?

mythravere

We can't provide any proof. You win. :)"Tiredofit

LOL I knew you would start toting what I said out.

Why do you think I put the smiley face in there?

LOL!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. LOL! Notice he took out the smiley face! HAHAHAHAHAHA!

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

We will provide all the "proof" you need when you define what you consider proof.

Once you do that, then I am certain it will be provided for you. Why are you so stubborn on this?

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

Gotcha...I knew you were trying to justify your bad behavior by trying to point out other people's alledged bad behavior. And of course what I said earlier was true but you tried to be clever and copy/pasted yourself into failure. You are so much fun Tired when the game doesn't go your way.

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

I can't prove a negative Tired you silly boy. You want me to prove that the science of manmade global warming is NOT political. tsk tsk

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

Thank you for what? Was my statement false in some manner?

Heck, you don't know what you even copy/pasted.

The science about man made global warming is not political.

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

"Hey are you offened by myths..."

Oh, I've seen this tactic before. Bill Oreilly points it out as a person trying to shrug his bad behvior by pointing out another person's alledged bad behavior.

Is that what you are trying to do Tired? Make your bad behavior not seem as bad?

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired, please stick to your tinfoil conspiracies...at least then you seem like you know what you are talking about. Even if it is just your own imagination.

The science about man made global warming is not political.

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

"so you're answer of 319J/g is very close( it is not exact probably due to heat loss)."

HAHAHAHA....who are you talking to in this? Oh that's right...you don't know what you are really talking about at all, and that's why you copy/pasted from yahoo. HAHA.

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

"Guess you don't know about latent heat."

Oh brother you are funny. You get so vague about science when it doesn't suit your fantasy of govt conspiracy but then you'll get anal about this kind of science. You are trully a silly man Tired.

Posted 69 days ago.

harryanderson

Have you named one climate scientist who says greenhouse gases in the atmosphere don't prevent heat from radiating back into space?

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

The science about man made global warming is not political.

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

"Although temperature wise the increase is small it still has an effect."

What's the difference between frozen water and liquid..one small degree. So depending on the situation, even a small increase can be important.

Are we familiar with the concept of the Butterfly Effect? One small change can have profound effects elsewhere. So what if there is one small change globally? Does it stand to reason that the impact would be great?

Posted 69 days ago.

mythravere

Before I do have some dinner I just want to repeat this.

Tired you got no credibility. Waste your time ON ME if you want.

But know full well the game you are playing is futile.

You're not ever going to win this.

Even if it came to light this was indeed all a hoax.

You've already lost...because of how you "debate".

Posted 69 days ago.

Kendall78

The science about man made global warming is not political.

Posted 69 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or