Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 days ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

" In six months some of the same idiots posting on here that regurgitate the lie of GW will refer back to this date and temp as their evidence that the world is getting hotter."

Um no you freaking idiot. God how stupid are you.

It was actually nice when you stopped posting on here.

Posted 181 days ago.

mythravere

Only an absolute fool would "read" into what the NOAA website is saying right now.

And sure enough we got the fool thatsabsurd latching onto it!

Posted 181 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

*******forecast.weather.gov

Posted 181 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

Current Conditions

Fair

104°F

40°C

Humidity19% Wind SpeedNA BarometerNA Dewpoint54°F (12°C) Visibility10.00 mi Heat Index102°F (39°C)

Last Update on 29 Jan 2:53 pm EST

Current conditions at

Parkersburg, Mid Ohio Valley Regional Airport (KPKB)

Lat: 39.36°N Lon: 81.43°W Elev: 831ft.

More Local Wx | 3 Day History | Mobile Weather 3 Miles SW Parkersburg WV

Posted 181 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

LOL Noaa has been deliberately altering the temperature recordings of the last few weeks(just like they did the great lakes temps of over 400) They have Parkersburg, WV listed at 104f today. In six months some of the same idiots posting on here that regurgitate the lie of GW will refer back to this date and temp as their evidence that the world is getting hotter.

The only thing is they will believe without a doubt it was true. So get used to it people todays temperature in Parkersburg is 104f.

Posted 181 days ago.

Tiredofit

Did you spot the exaggerations in the ipcc report?

Posted 181 days ago.

harryanderson

And I've seen anything called "how to talk to a denier."

I can spot exaggerations and falsehoods without such help.

Posted 181 days ago.

harryanderson

I don't go to websites such as the one you describe. Sounds to political for me.

Posted 181 days ago.

Tiredofit

Ahh harry you are just not that clever, looking at enviromarxists website about "how to talk to a denier". It gives a series of questions and provides talking points. Lol it's just what you are trying to use right down to your tobacco references. Lol. Oh harry.

Posted 181 days ago.

Tiredofit

She also didn't say it was u acceptable, so she tacitly endorsed it by doing nothing about it. She freely admired it was to garner funding. The president said unequivocaly climate change is real. So no there is no uncertainty as far as he is concerned. The emails DO show collusion and fraud despite what sham investigation said. So if climatology is exaggerating for what if not money?

Posted 181 days ago.

harryanderson

Here’s an example of unexaggerated, concrete language:

195 out of the 200 climate scientists who have most published peer-reviewed papers and been most cited in other papers believe mankind’s activities have contributed to global warming.

Posted 181 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

PEER REVIEW LOL LOL LOL the only ones they can get to agree are their peers.....anyone else who ever vetted it from the science world called it hogwash from the beginning.

So lets look ate the credentials of their peers............

Accountants without any jobs kills......self-proclaim to be "Climate Scientists) Literature degrees unable to find employment become staff to the "self-proclaimed' climate science world, expounding on their world of 'make-believe"

and then you have the imbecile loyal followers wearing their Tin-foil hats salivating over their every word.........

Some of which you can find on this very forum.

Posted 181 days ago.

harryanderson

“And just how do you propose to do that”

First, let’s stop exaggerating. Let’s look at some of the exaggerations you have made just this morning.

“It's clearly accepted as she said to gain funding.” You exaggerated. She didn’t say it was “accepted.” She said it was done.

“According to you and your president there is no uncertainty.” I’ve already dealt with this falsehood.

“those that are on the gravy train” You exaggerated. Climate scientists aren’t getting rich.

“Emails clearly show deception and secrecy.” You exaggerated, according to multiple independent investigations.

So, as a first step, I propose we stop using sensational exaggerated language such as “accepted,” “ no uncertainty,” “gravy train,” and “clearly.”

So will you agree to stop exaggerating?

Posted 181 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is too much money at stake for those involved.

Posted 181 days ago.

Tiredofit

The problem with you Harry is you BELIEVE that all this "research" is done with the intent to remove doubt. The fact is, exaggerations are an acceptable ploy to get attention and funding. Emails clearly show deception and secrecy. You will never get those that are on the gravy train to junmp off.

Posted 181 days ago.

Tiredofit

And just how do you propose to do that

Posted 181 days ago.

harryanderson

That's not true. I never said there was no uncertainty. I said over 97% of the most expert climate scientists, determined by peer-reviewed publications and citations, agree with the IPCC.

Would you like to change that percentage? It can be done.

Posted 181 days ago.

Tiredofit

According to you and your president there is no uncertainty.

Posted 181 days ago.

harryanderson

So how do we reduce the uncertainty?

Posted 181 days ago.

Tiredofit

The acceptance of exaggerating by the NOAA climate program director tells me a lot. It's clearly accepted as she said to gain funding. Peer review. Ha. So you mean all the folks on the money train agree they like the ride?

Posted 181 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or