Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
7 hours ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

"will lead to widespread climate change "Not maybe , not likely , but will ! So tiredbrain quit asking for research that states that man is causing some part of global warming , YOU"VE GOT IT AND STILL DENY IT !!!

Posted 15 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The questions tiredbrain refuses to answer ! Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ????This is proof by your silence that your full of crap !

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

What did I say was a MOST LIKELY FUTURE?

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

And why is it wrong for Al Gore, who is, after all, a private citizen, to profit from what Tiredofit says is a "most likely" future?

Care to explain this one>>>???

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

You profited from the rape of the climate, how can you enjoy anything you own>?

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

Would you say you had MORE responsibility than most, Sorta like the cigarette companies are more to blame than the smoker?

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

LETS BE CLEAR on what I said Harry, you are starting to twist it.

"The use of fossil fuels most likely will become less advantageous as time goes on and they most likely will phase out for the most part."

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

Al Gore profited from what????? I said fossil fuels would be phases out by more efficient renewables perhaps, AL GORE profited from lying and fear mongering then sold his TV network to OIL profits, NOT THE SAME THING nice job twisting what I said.

Posted 15 days ago.

JoeBlow

Is Al Gore profiting from Global Warming about like Bernie Madoff profiting from selling securities?

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

I am not worried about the use of Fossil fuels dooming the world, However I am worried about SOCIALISTS and Enviromarxists using panic to fool the dumbest amongst us to clamor for the Govt to save them from a made up crisis.

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

Well, I still think you should be forced to sell everything you purchases with OIL money. Sort of like the RICO act, all oil profits should be treated as illegal

Posted 15 days ago.

harryanderson

Sure, I owe, Tiredofit,

When I was a kid, I was taught to leave things better than I found them. My generation hasn't done that.

One thing I'm doing is educating people to the dangers we face if we continue on our same course.

What are you doing?

Posted 15 days ago.

harryanderson

And why is it wrong for Al Gore, who is, after all, a private citizen, to profit from what Tiredofit says is a "most likely" future?

Isn't that how the free market is supposed to work? Those astute enough to invest in emerging technologies deserve to make money, don't they? That's what Bill Gates did. And Henry Ford.

Posted 15 days ago.

mythravere

Well in Al Gore's case he is kinda sorta a hypocrite.

For all he has said about the dangers of climate change and that we must shift ourselves off of fossil fuels his carbon footprint is rather large. And if he was serious about making the needed changes he'd lead by example.

There's ways for him to get around that could demonstrate low to no carbon use.

He could for one thing have his jet powered by carbon neutral jet fuels. And use the myriad of ways out there to reduce is living arrangements carbon footprint.

You know smaller more energy efficient home etc.

Posted 15 days ago.

Tiredofit

I believe in taking personal responsibility, so I don't wait for government to act when I know change will happen.

SO what are you doing???? AND AGAING HARRY< since you have profited from the "destruction of the climate" do you feel you owe those of use who DIDNT profit from it? Some reparations perhaps?>>>

Posted 15 days ago.

JoeBlow

The point is being a hippocrite about global warming by over indulgence.

Posted 15 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Although he is a wealthy person as are most who are or were in public office , the rich do tend to fly where they want and can afford big homes and fancy cars . So whats the point ?

Posted 15 days ago.

Ohwiseone

So far Joe I haven't seen Al Gore on the billionaires list so just maybe you're stretching it a bit !

Posted 15 days ago.

JoeBlow

No prob Myth. I don't see any solution that would not have some kind of an enviromental affect, all I see is the government wanting to get rich from the problems. Al Gore making a billion dollars off this has no qualms about flying solo in a big jet to give speaches and living in a house that is much larger than needed.

Posted 15 days ago.

mythravere

Sorry my bad Joe. I was thinking of the nickel metal hydride batteries. Not lipo battery packs.

As an aside. The battery and its cost is the problem. I don't know why they can build cars with diesel generators in them. Think diesel locomotives.

Wait a minute I know. Too good of fuel milage for the oil proponents and the fact that it would still be using an oil product for the enviro minded people.

Posted 15 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or