Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

"Bush never glorified smoking dope."

No, Bush tried to glorify being a dope.

Sorry, I had to say that one :)

Posted 247 days ago.

Kendall78

"Bush never had the country in racial turmoil."

Neither has Obama.

Posted 247 days ago.

Kendall78

"Bush never blamed Clinton for what happened under his watch."

President Bush said on CNN, "Two and a half years ago, we inherited an economy in recession."

Bush also said, "In the last six months of the prior administration, more than 200,000 manufacturing jobs were lost."

Sounds like he blamed Clinton to me.

Posted 247 days ago.

Kendall78

"Bush didn't lie every time his lips moved."

No one lies everytime their lips move. Leave the drama queen stuff for other boards.

Posted 247 days ago.

Kendall78

"Bush never spent millions of dollars on ritzy expensive vacations."

Kind of vague here. What exactly counts as ritzy? Or expensive?

Bush most certainly spent millions on his travels. I would find it hard to imagine any modern day President not spending millions when he goes on vacation.

Bush had the Western White House that was his home and he took vacations there. Would you complain if Obama would do something similar with either Hawaii or Chicago?

Posted 247 days ago.

Kendall78

"Bush never played golf with a war going on."

President Bush however said, "I see our president criticized for playing golf. I don't. I think he ought to play golf. Because I know what it's like to be in the bubble. I know the pressures of the job, and to be able to get outside and play golf with some of your pals is important for the president. It does give you an outlet."

If it's alright with Bush, it should be alright with you Ithink.

Posted 247 days ago.

And if the nukes come, it will be in response to obama policies and actions. Obama's foreign policies are a disaster, just like his domestic policies. Anyone lose their health care? Join the crowd.

Posted 247 days ago.

Bush never played golf with a war going on. Bush never spent millions of dollars on ritzy expensive vacations. Bush didn't lie every time his lips moved. Bush never blamed Clinton for what happened under his watch. Bush never had the country in racial turmoil. Bush never glorified smoking dope. Bush never blamed talk radio and the media for his problems. Bush never blamed America for the world's problems.Obama does all those pathetic things and more.

Posted 247 days ago.

h ttp://w ww.globalclimatescam****/2013/12/epa-climate-policy-expert-sentenced-to-32-months-for-fraud/

myth I could fill up a book with climate scientist fraud. And I will continue to point fingers at the destruction of our country that is happening RIGHT NOW.

All you can do is talk about old history,,,, Bush- Cheney. Obama is the destroyer right now of our constitutional rights and government. Even many democrats say so.

Rule by pen....the obama way.

Posted 247 days ago.

I was talking about the whole global warming cult. I did not say just scientists. But we have already discussed scientists who faked stats to keep the grants rolling in .Also in the money greedy bunch are Al Gore, Michael Moore, Solyndra,etc.,and all the grant receivers who have no positive results. Also among the corrupt are the government officials handing out the grants to friends and buddies. Starting with obama.

Posted 248 days ago.

Thatsabsurd

LOL they are scrambling they are scrambling......cut off funding for the imbeciles and they have to go back to the only profession they can do part way correct ..............Goldfish babysitting

Posted 248 days ago.

Just more proven examples of the warmists' addiction to exaggeration and hoax tactics. Who would want to join a group of money snatching liars?

Let's go get a sun tan. WHERE? ?????

Posted 248 days ago.

harryanderson

Meteorologists aren't climate scientists anyway. 97.5% of the 200 most-published and most-cited climate researchers agree with "the tenets of the IPCC."

Posted 248 days ago.

h ttp://w ww.forbes.c om/sites/jamestaylor/2013/11/20/the-latest-meteorologist-survey-destroys-the-global-warming-climate-consensus/

"Barely half of American Meteorological Society meteorologists believe global warming is occurring "

Posted 249 days ago.

h ttp://w ww.forbes.c om/sites/jamestaylor/2014/01/24/michael-manns-global-warming-argument-fuels-denier-skepticism/

" a recent survey of American Meteorological Society (AMS) atmospheric scientists found only 38 percent of AMS scientists believe future warming will be very harmful, and an even smaller 30 percent are very worried about global warming. This is a far cry from Mann’s unsupported assertion that “97 percent agree … we must respond to the dangers of a warming planet.”

Posted 249 days ago.

harryanderson

So, Tiredofit,

Are you interested in reducing the scientific uncertainty, or do you choose to continue making doubt your product?

Posted 249 days ago.

harryanderson

Of the 200 “strongest and most credentialed (climate) researchers, a whopping 97.5% “fully agree…anthropogenic greenhouse gases have been responsible for ‘most’ of the ‘unequivocal’ warming of the Earth’s average global temperature over the second half of the 20th century.”

You have not shown where any grantors gave grants on the condition that the recipients of those grants prove a connection between global climate change and greenhouse gases. No instances=no basis for your claim.

As for the mild term denier, you have complained about it repeatedly. After the first complaint, I said I would no longer use it. I hoped foreswearing the term would allow your fragile self-esteem to heal. Apparently not.

Posted 249 days ago.

Kendall78

So was, "HOw can you trust the information if you know it may exaggerated to get attention and funding", tongue in cheek or did you mean it?

Posted 249 days ago.

Kendall78

Youth, like truth..is in the eye of the beholder. You should know this, your eyes see a new truth everyday. Just a pity they rarely see any facts.

Posted 249 days ago.

Kendall78

"Debunk 97 percent CHECK"

Uncheck...you debunked nothing except allow it to be shown that the 97% were those who actually known something about climate science.

"Demonstrate Results for Funding CHECK,"

Uncheck, you have shown there are those that says it happens. You offer no evidence that it actually has.

"Deny the term DENIER CHECK,"

Uncheck, you have done nothing but denied evidence of man made climate change. You ignore the information of those you have mentioned yourself when it does not suit you. You are the very living embodiment of a denier.

"Well my work is done for a while thanks."

Yep, I think you are done, quite done.

Posted 250 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or