Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

Like I have said before. You can lay every single fact on the table. Tiredofit and his ilk will just deny all of it.

Posted 49 days ago.

mythravere

And when a person's opinion is that biased you'll never be able to convince them otherwise.

Posted 49 days ago.

mythravere

The only thing Tiredofit will accept as fact on this issue is information that shows that scientists are lying about it and that its all a hoax.

He is diametrically opposed to this issue.

He is 110% biased against mans role in changing our climate.

Nothing can convince him that it is real.

Posted 49 days ago.

Tiredofit

Have you ever worked a Govt job?

Posted 49 days ago.

Kendall78

"SO its sorta important."

I'm not saying it's not noteworthy or anything. But unless you actually have real examples where NOAA has done these theoretical exagerrations...you have nothing.

"There is NO WAY that the data will say.."

All I care to see from that satellite is information on whether CO2 effects the way our atmosphere absorbs the energy from the Sun. And whether yes or no, that the public accept the findings. Denial in the face of hard facts (no matter the side of the argument) is pitiful.

Posted 49 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is NO WAY that the data will say, cut our budget, nothing to see here. LOL

Posted 49 days ago.

Tiredofit

When a Govt official admits its ok to lie for more funding I find that important you would rather be obtuse.

Posted 49 days ago.

Tiredofit

Yes its opinion, but its the opinion of a manager of a govt agency that will tell you what the data says. SO its sorta important

Posted 49 days ago.

Kendall78

What Monica Kopacz had to say in the past has nothing to do with this satellite or even man made global warming really.

Unless you can clearly point out where NOAA or other major agencies have willfully lied with information...her statement is nothing but opinion.

Posted 49 days ago.

Kendall78

"I don't think we can call this unbiased"

Sooo.that's a no from you. To be more precise...no information from any satellite will be accepted by you as fact. Even if the infor gathered supports your position. Is this true?

Posted 49 days ago.

Tiredofit

That's NOAA climate project manager Monica Kopacx. A GOVT employee. SO please forgive my incredulity.

Posted 49 days ago.

Tiredofit

Lets not forget Monica Kopacz NOAA climIt is no secret that a lot of climate-change research is subject to opinion, that climate models sometimes disagree even on the signs of the future changes (e.g. drier vs. wetter future climate). The problem is, only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians' - and readers' - attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today's world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty.ate project managers words.,,,,,

Posted 49 days ago.

Tiredofit

Hmmmm a govt agency like NOAA whos very funding is based on results. I don't think we can call this unbiased. Its not the data, rather who is disseminating and interpreting the data

Posted 49 days ago.

Kendall78

NASA launched its Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) today. The satellite, "will study the absorption of sunlight by carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere."

Can both sides of the argument agree that whatever this satellite discovers will be considered FACT and not an opinion or conspiracy please?

Posted 49 days ago.

Kendall78

Also keep in mind that not once has anyone tried to use "racism" to disavow any of Tired's positions on climate change.

Of course, Tired has yet to clarify his position on climate change really.

Posted 51 days ago.

Kendall78

Ithink, do you agree that woman are emotional like gingers? Just curious.

Posted 51 days ago.

Tiredofit, everything is racist to people who have race stuck in their brain.

Posted 51 days ago.

mythravere

The life that a homosexual person is completely normal to them.

Who are we to deny them the normality that they choose for themselves?

As long as they are law abiding who cares.

Good thing there isn't any religious born laws that can limit what they choose to do.

Because that is honestly the only people who would take issue with that kind of a life style. Completely ignoring that homosexual people have been on this planet longer than Christianity.

Posted 51 days ago.

mythravere

Speaking of Christians. Why is it Christians especially the highly political types take such a huge issue with this Muslims instituting sharia law in this country?

While trying to institute their own flavor of religious laws on this nation.

I think thats hilarious.

Bunch of me me me me type of people.

Posted 51 days ago.

Kendall78

...most humans won't work for the betterment of all. Of course, Marx never really supported the unnatural push to impliment communism on people by a govt. His thoery had it that mankind would eventually go that way on it's own naturally.

It's like Republicanism. We tried to force it on Germany after WWI and it failed. It has also essentially failed in Iraq and other places.

Posted 51 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or