Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 hours ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

If I understand who you are talking about, I have been to that house on several occasions but never at a whiz bang party sadly. I doubt that you are correct in your association however.

Posted 9 days ago.

Kunectdots

His mother wasn't much of a doctor either (IMO) although I understand she hosted some really Wiz-Bang parties!

Posted 9 days ago.

Stillhere

I seriously doubt that Harry is indeed a lawyer nor the person you think he is, either way WHO CARES hes just wrong and that's all that's important

Posted 9 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Why not , you tried to pawn yourself off as a shop steward !

Posted 9 days ago.

Stillhere

You are not suggesting that our Harry is being less than honest about his political affiliation are you?

Posted 9 days ago.

Stillhere

If you are referring to the person I think u are, he's a big leftie and warming lemming but also a party Democrat and our very own Harry is a republican,

Posted 9 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Ah yes , more republican speculation ! Probably not the facts but you'll repeat it anyway !

Posted 9 days ago.

Stillhere

That's cannot be Kunec

Posted 9 days ago.

Stillhere

Son of a doctor?

Posted 9 days ago.

Stillhere

As in W.A.?

Posted 9 days ago.

Kunectdots

Stillhere - I think "Harry" IS an attorney and I think I know which one.

Posted 9 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Harry there is no " rational discourse" with these brainless minions of the right , when they have no logical argument they resort to the casting of aspersions !

Posted 9 days ago.

Stillhere

konec have you ever heard a con artist that didn't have a slick tongue?

Posted 9 days ago.

Stillhere

Feel free to spew your propaganda in our little forum, It seems to be quite the source of joy for you. Tell us how the earth has a fever and only Govt can save us.

Posted 9 days ago.

Stillhere

When you introduce the term anti science, your views on science become germain. When you cite false and debunked statistics your honesty is also a valid subject. When you pretend to be a republican or claim a connection to WV and the mid Ohio valley your area of residence is a valid question although apparently a big international secret

Posted 9 days ago.

Kunectdots

"God darnit, Mr. Anderson, you use your tongue prettier than a twenty dollar wh-ore."

Maybe you should have been an attorney!

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

And such tactics "generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.”

Or, in the words of my original response, it foils rational discourse.

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

“An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.”

ht tp://ww w.urbandictionary.co m/define.php?term=Internet%20Troll

I’d say changing the subject from

1.climate change to the 2014 election to

2. my politics to

3.county of residence to

4. the origin of man

all iwithin a couple of hours, qualifies as posting “… irrelevant or off-topic messages.”

and I’d say calling people “useful idiots” and “frauds” qualifies as posting “inflammatory” messages.

As for having “the primary intent of provoking other users,” I’ll not make that charge. I’m no mind reader.

However, you might want to do some soul-searching on that score, IMHO.

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

“Tea party challenges to Republican senators are fizzling across the country, leaving Mississippi as the only state where a longtime Republican officeholder is seriously endangered by a primary threat from his right.”

Read more: ht tp://ww w.washingtontimes.co m/news/2014/mar/3/tea-party-loses-some-steam-in-gop-races/#ixzz3Ldul90jR

And of course, the challenge in Mississippi also failed. The Republican Party moved back to its traditional pragmatism and away from the firebombs.

Posted 10 days ago.

mythravere

Has anyone stated that we much submit to the government.

Better yet don't get angry at the government. Get angry with the "citizens" of this nation for electing such an inept group of nitwits.

Posted 10 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or