Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
8 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

"you don't offer up your real name either"

And you are therefor incorrect again. Kendall is my last name. I've also written many letters to the editor using my name.

In the end, you don't use your real name because I gather you are a coward.

Posted 191 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry I pay little attention to you regardless of your kissing my ring or attacking me. The FACT is you don't live anywhere near here and have NO connection to the mid ohio valley, one has to wonder why you feel the need to be here. I don't post on the Las Vegas Examiner web site as I DONT LIVE THERE.

Posted 191 days ago.

Tiredofit

The scammers have been ably assisted by a palace guard media that eagerly reports the scammers’ every lie while ignoring every inconvenient truth. You’ll skim the mainstream media in vain for the reason behind the trapped expedition’s trip to the Antarctic. And, of course, the most inconvenient truth of all is that it hasn’t gotten significantly warmer since the industrial revolution started generating CO2, and it hasn’t warmed at all in recent years.

Posted 191 days ago.

harryanderson

Just the other day, Tiredofit, I said I didn't think your bullying tactics reflect your true personality. And today you return to name-calling and, incredibly, try to bully me into leaving this forum!

I'm sorry, but I'm inclined to decline your invitation.

Posted 191 days ago.

Tiredofit

By Kurt Schlichter

Between global warming suckers getting entombed in ice while trying to prove the Antarctic ice cap has melted to most of America doing a Frigidaire impression, the entire facade of this bogus leftist power grab is crumbling.

Understand that the climate change meme is simply the latest attempt by leftists to trick society into remaking itself in their image. It was never about science. It was always about power and money.

Posted 191 days ago.

Tiredofit

Are you from the BOSTON 78s> LOL

Posted 191 days ago.

Tiredofit

as far as I know, you don't offer up your real name either, is that the new rule???

Posted 191 days ago.

Tiredofit

Kendall pound sand.

Posted 191 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired why don't you contribute to the paper where you live and stop polluting our forum with you propaganda.

I can say this because there is no evidence that you are actually from this area. Now if you would feel free to offer up your real name...

Posted 191 days ago.

Kendall78

Now when those who say that the global rise in temps are not do to man, they offer nothing to show that their side is correct.

Posted 191 days ago.

Kendall78

I have seen no false premise on here. When Harry or others say that the overall temperature of the Earth is going up, they back it up with actual data.

When they say that CO2 is a green house gas, they back it up with science.

When the science says that global temps will go up, they have been largely correct.

Posted 191 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry why don't you contribute to the paper where you live and stop polluting our forum with you propaganda

Posted 191 days ago.

Tiredofit

In a false premise, the dishonest party bases his or her argument on unproven assumptions, or premises. YOUR FALSE PREMISE IS THE PREDICTIONS OF THE IPCC. You hold up 10k as an attempt to purchase science , any school kid could see that a six figure salary and BILLIONS of dollars would clearly be a reson NOT to support the truth. Harry you have proven once again what a FRAUD you are.

Posted 191 days ago.

Kendall78

Ithink, Which of these people are from Chicago and have taught Constitutional Law? Barack Obama or Jonathan Turley

The answer is both but why are you siding with Turley?

I will admit that Turley is consistent. He was against President Bush's warrantless domestic surveillance program and was in favor of Clinton's impeachment for his abuse of executive privilege.

Posted 191 days ago.

Kendall78

@Ithink- What has the President done that is unlawful? If he had, obviously the other 2 branches of govt would have stepped in but have they?

Turley said, "I happen to agree with many of President Obama's policies, but in our system it is often as important how you do something as what you do."

So why isn't the other two branches doing something then if Obama is wrong?

Posted 191 days ago.

Kendall78

"I intended to just ignore your post.."

It's always easy to ignore questions, it difficult to answer questions. You just keeping to that easy road.

Posted 191 days ago.

mythravere

Yea. Notice how Tiredofit always directs the discussion onto the funding angle.

Seems to be the only argument he has.

One thing about it. Its the type of topic that can be highly manipulated.

Its all heresay and blind assumptions.

Posted 191 days ago.

harryanderson

Ithink,

I’ll explain this again, since you seem to have a hard time grasping it.

Climate is a series of weather events observed over a period of time, usually decades or centuries. Weather is one event.

Let’s try it this way: I once caught a Northern Pike at the mouth of Decker’s Creek, which, at the time, was a sickly acidic mine-waste carrot-looking orange. By no means did I consider the Monongahela a good place to catch Pike. I probably could have fished there from now until this day and never seen another.

Hopefully, this will clear up some of your obvious confusion.

Posted 191 days ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit is trying to gouge out your eyes so you can’t see the plain truth. To do so, he’s using a dishonest rhetorical trick called “false premise.”

In a false premise, the dishonest party bases his or her argument on unproven assumptions, or premises.

Tiredofit’s argument would be honest if we accept his premise: the government grants money to support the IPCC. He wants you to assume that it does. Don’t. He has to prove it or his argument is invalid.

Keep your vision clear. Don’t let them gouge out your eyes with false premises.

Posted 191 days ago.

mythravere

As I have said before extra heat equals an addition to the energy that is present in the atmosphere. It means that through increased evaporation due to heat their will be more moisture in the air. And what happens when a moisture laden air mass collides with a cold or arctic air mass.

SNOW! Weeeeee!

Posted 191 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or