Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
7 hours ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia All I advocate is there IS research that says man has and will have a role in climate change !

Posted 66 days ago.

harryanderson

“You may offer what you define as proof, go ahead show us.”

In view of what you just posted, I’ll repeat the question I asked twice yesterday, and which you avoided answering.

Are you now willing to consider scientific evidence?

Posted 66 days ago.

harryanderson

You guys might as well give up citing science to Tiredofit. He’s been quite clear; he won’t accept scientific evidence. He wrote, “…it IS a political agenada, not a scientific discussion. (sic)”

Posted 66 days ago.

harryanderson

Once again, Tiredofit suppresses rational discussion. He demands “proof,” but won’t accept proof under the most common definition of it.

He defines proof two ways. He wrote, “Proof is a concept that is really only applicable in mathematics, because math deals with abstract concepts and definitions.” Under this definition, changes in land and sea temperature, disappearing ice at the poles, and the like aren’t evidence. These things can be observed. They aren’t abstract, so Tiredofit won’t accept them because they can be observed.

He also wrote, “To be proven, something needs to be demonstrable and repeatable.” According to this definition, rapidly rising temperatures over the last century don’t count because we can’t repeat the last century.

Tiredofit’s position is absurd.

Posted 66 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia All I advocate is there IS research that says man has and will have a role in climate change !

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

True or false Triedofit.

You will deny any and all facts/proof we provide even when they are truthful and accurate.

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

"We have no proof, you win ;)"

You forgot the all important smiley.

I was just seeing if you'd do a victory dance.

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

Lizden is a climatologist"

He's retired now though. So is his information up to date? I don't know.

But something you should know about him.

He acknowledges that the planet is warming. Unlike you.

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

True or false Triedofit.

You will deny any and all facts/proof we provide even when they are truthful and accurate.

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

Where is your proof Tiredofit?

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

Sorry my bad. The website didn't come through. Not that you need it anyways. A quick google and you'd have it. But anyways.

That came from The Guardian.

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

"Anti science denier. Counter climate. All terms you on the socialist left apply to those that question your religion of Algore."

This has nothing to do with debating the facts of this issue.

This is just you flinging mud.

Which is in reality the only angle you have.

We go through facts and it devolves into us vs them politics.

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

The Weekly Standard's Lindzen puff piece exemplifies the conservative media's climate failures The Weekly Standard suggests we should gamble our future on the climate scientist who's been the wrongest, longest

Also a good read.

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

LOL! I never called you a child molester. I only wanted to know if you would like for me to call you one in lieu of you calling me a socialist.

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 11:48AM Reflections on Rapid Response to Unjustified Climate Alarm By RICHARD LINDZEN"

Of course its a good read for you Tiredofit.

Its authority that appeals to you.

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

Hey Tired you are a denier of the so called global warming hoax are you not? LOL!

If the glove fits.

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

"Explain how air has a surface???????? Lol"

WOW! If there isn't some degree of surface area to air then why does it push back on your hand when you stick your hand out the window of a moving car?

And you know there is a thing called surface temps in regards to the air temps near ground level of this planet.

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

Hey Tired. It was theorized about the ocean warming last year. The confirming discoveries were made this year.

LOL!

Posted 66 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia All I advocate is there IS research that says man has and will have a role in climate change !

Posted 66 days ago.

mythravere

I didn't bother to read your article. You do that so much I don't even bother anymore.

Posted 66 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or