Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

We met your challenge. The problem is that you have ever moving goal posts with requirements that are vague and never able to be satisfied.

You aren't man enough to admit when you are wrong and you stay the course no matter what.

Funny that you start holding us up as something to be disgusted about.

Whats the matter have we exposed your sordid underbelly too much and now you have to deflect attention away from thy self?

Me thinks thats the game you are playing now.

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

LOL! The jokes on you Tired. I'd advise you to google Shut up Little Man and see what that actually is because I don't doubt its what you might be like in real life.

Posted 44 days ago.

Kendall78

What radical changes are you even talking about Tired?

Posted 44 days ago.

Kendall78

What radical changes are you even talking about Tired?

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

"Just read it and understand who they are"

Channel some Liam Neeson with this one.

LOL!

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

"Witness the left in these posts"

Read that with the voice Don LaFontaine better know as THE VOICE of the movies in your head.

Hilarious!

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

Shut up little man! You talk falsely!

Posted 44 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Well , you don't know anything other than your right-wing brainwashing will let you and I have research from a study that's not funded by the USA ! HMMMMMMM now who would a sane person believe ??Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ???? Since you all are holding to the official Faux news line-o crap I would like to see the facts you're working from !

Posted 44 days ago.

Ohwiseone

"Those that think like you, are wanting a radical change in our very lives and economy " Please pass along your proof and facts supporting your ignorance ! Sound more and more like a commercial for big oil and coal !Again , whose agenda are you folloeing ?

Posted 44 days ago.

Kendall78

What radical changes are you even talking about Tired?

Posted 44 days ago.

Kendall78

"are wanting a radical change in our very lives and economy"

What radical change are you alluding to?

Again, for consideration: earthobservatory.nasa.g ov/IOTD/view.p hp?id=80167

Posted 44 days ago.

Kendall78

For consideration: earthobservatory.nasa.g ov/IOTD/view.p hp?id=80167

Posted 44 days ago.

Ohwiseone

You have no proof that this study was funded by any government ! Please pass along your proof and facts supporting your ignorance !

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

As much as I hate to have to explain this I will.

It doesn't take too much thought to conclude that its highly possible that in a squirrels natural environment. The co2 it exhales in its lifetime is quickly taken up into the environment it resides in.

Thats part of the carbon cycle. The same carbon cycle that lead to fossil fuels in the ground.

The thing about mankind's emissions is that its on such an order that the natural environment can not deal with it all.

Its going to be interesting to see how you side step that.

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

" CO2 is CO2 regardless of its source but somehow you think because they live in trees as you say, they don't count LOL"

In addition to all of your other negative traits you are now putting words in my mouth. LOL!

Man you really couldn't be a bigger piece of*****could you?

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

Oh there is hard evidence that a change is needed and has nothing to do with the climate.

It does have everything to do with how much fossil fuels we have left. Which to say the least is that the more time goes by the more expensive its going to get.

I mean given the difficulty in replacing carbon based fuels with something similar and the fact some things that are made from fossil fuels can not be made without them...I think its just prudent to begin and I do mean begin the process of finding and developing alternatives.

And where possible move off of fossil fuels and onto renewables so that the fossil fuels can be used for other things. For example in the case of power generation.

People don't understand how much of what we have involves the use of fossil fuels.

Posted 44 days ago.

Kendall78

"PROVE the negative"

No one has asked you to prove a negative.

Posted 44 days ago.

Kendall78

"There has been NO evidence that a change is needed. NONE. If there was, you would have provided it."

And it was provided and you didn't understand it. Seems to me that the problem lies in between your ears dear boy ;)

"you would shut me up with some HARD evidence."

It's painfully clear that no amount of evidence would shut you up. Maybe a few rolls of duct tape but hard facts..nope..that won't shut you up one bit and there are about 200 pages of your blather to back that claim up with.

And please don't cower away from this but please give us your defintion of what evidnece is.

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

What in the world did you hope to gain from bringing up a comment about squirrels I made?

As for proving my "theory". Well its not really a theory but more an assumption. But since it carries no weight in this discussion I feel no need to flesh it out.

Which of course you are going to complain about.

LOL!

Posted 44 days ago.

Kendall78

"church of ALGORE."

Wow, that's a pretty p*ss poor attempt at guilt by association Tired.

Posted 44 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or