Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 minute ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

harryanderson

Tiredofit must undermine climate science because, like his hero Joe Bast says, "The scientific debate is a source of enormous frustration."

Posted 21 days ago.

harryanderson

And of course Tiredofit won't accept the testimony of climate scientists. He can't because he can't lose. And he has lost the scientific debate.

Like Joe Bast, the Heartland Institute boss, said, "We've won the public opinion debate, and we've won the political debate as well. But the scientific debate is a source of enormous frustration."

Posted 21 days ago.

harryanderson

Myth and Kendall,

You are 100% correct. Tiredofit will never accept the testimony of climate scientists unless they agree with his political and cultural worldview. He's made that clear. After all, he has said that it's a political debate, not a scientific debate.

Posted 21 days ago.

harryanderson

And if anonymous internet posters want to be considered more credible than the world's most-published experts, then let those posters list their credentials. What is their academic background? What have they published, and where?

Posted 21 days ago.

harryanderson

The most-published and most-peer-reviewed climate scientists are the most credible experts out there, and several studies have shown that 97% of them accept the consensus opinion.

Posted 21 days ago.

harryanderson

According to this scientist, the heat is going into the oceans.

I still say climate scientists have more credibility than others on this subject, and I don't believe they lie to get government funding, and I don't believe all these climate scientists are twisting their findings to institute some kind of socialist government.

Posted 21 days ago.

harryanderson

Kendall posted a statement from someone with expertise on the subject. Not Charles Krauthammer, not John Cook, not an anonymous internet poster.

A scientist. Kendall posted, "'The climate system is not linear, it is not straightforward. It is not necessarily reflected in the temperature in the atmosphere, but if you look at the temperature profile in the ocean, the heat is going in the oceans,' said Oksana Tarasova, chief of the atmospheric research division at the WMO."

Posted 21 days ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit, I asked, "For example, if your activities cause someone to suffer breathing problems, should you be held liable?"

I understood you to answer, "Not necessarily."

Under what circumstances should you not be liable for causing someone else's breathing problems?

Posted 21 days ago.

harryanderson

"By your logic, peanut growers would bear the medical costs of those with peanut allergies, dog owners for those with pet allergies."

Wrong. Peanut growers and dog owners don't CAUSE allergies.

Posted 21 days ago.

harryanderson

"But some profit more, like you."

Wherever did you get that idea? Perhaps you need to look up the definition of "vested interests."

In law, a "vested" interest is a right or title that can be conveyed to another.

I didn't say I profited more than others.

Posted 21 days ago.

harryanderson

"But some profit more, like you."

Wherever did you get that idea? Perhaps you need to look up the definition of "vested interests."

In law, a "vested" interest is a right or title that can be conveyed to another.

I didn't say I profited more than others.

Posted 21 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Tiredofit

Did I state anything that was untrue? Oh yeah !!! Either way you want it tirebrain ! If you were truly a "shop steward" your representation would have been grounds for dismissal and then theres the other side of it ! You're probably just another republican liar who claims to be a steward from a Canadian union and wouldn't know the truth if it bit it on the arse !

Posted 21 days ago.

Kendall78

"Cook is an activist and looks great in his Nazi uniform."

What does this have anything to do with climate change science and data?

Can you show that Cook's views are actually skewed or are you practicing the art of implication without facts again?

Posted 21 days ago.

Kendall78

(From the BBC) "Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere between 2012 and 2013 grew at their fastest rate since 1984."

"The WMO's annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin doesn't measure emissions from power station smokestacks but instead records how much of the warming gases remain in the atmosphere after the complex interactions that take place between the air, the land and the oceans."

""The climate system is not linear, it is not straightforward. It is not necessarily reflected in the temperature in the atmosphere, but if you look at the temperature profile in the ocean, the heat is going in the oceans," said Oksana Tarasova, chief of the atmospheric research division at the WMO."

Posted 21 days ago.

Kendall78

"Was not addressing you Jimmy, pay attention."

Learn to quote and do citations properly then. Any high schooler could do that, so I have hope you might be able to do it as well.

Posted 21 days ago.

Tiredofit

Cook is an activist and looks great in his Nazi uniform. Have you see those pics

Posted 21 days ago.

Tiredofit

Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't it you that claimed only certain sites, those deemed neutral by you , would be read?

Posted 21 days ago.

Tiredofit

Did I state anything that was untrue?

Posted 21 days ago.

Tiredofit

Was not addressing you Jimmy, pay attention.

Posted 21 days ago.

Kendall78

I didn't post anything about 97% of anything. Pay attention.

(From the BBC) "Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere between 2012 and 2013 grew at their fastest rate since 1984."

"The WMO's annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin doesn't measure emissions from power station smokestacks but instead records how much of the warming gases remain in the atmosphere after the complex interactions that take place between the air, the land and the oceans."

""The climate system is not linear, it is not straightforward. It is not necessarily reflected in the temperature in the atmosphere, but if you look at the temperature profile in the ocean, the heat is going in the oceans," said Oksana Tarasova, chief of the atmospheric research division at the WMO."

Posted 21 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or