Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 hours ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

Oh I wasn't lying. Since I figured you like to say crap to get a reaction out of people I figured I do the same.

Just admit you aren't on here to truthfully debate this issue.

If you did...well this would look a lot different.

Posted 44 days ago.

harryanderson

"A demonstrable link, linear cause and effect, direct correlation."

That's not the way the rest of the world defines proof. According to dictionary dot com, proof is "evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true, or to produce belief in its truth" or "anything serving as such evidence."

In law, its "evidence having probative weight."

Posted 44 days ago.

harryanderson

"We've tried to have a nice rational discussion with Tiredofit to no avail."

Of course. That's why he subverts rational discussion. The scientific debate, which involves reason, is "of enormous frustration" to him, so he must avoid it.

And his ego won't allow him to avoid it by staying away, so he turns the discussion into something like a Saturday night brawl in Anchorage when the Palin clan arrives in a stretch Hummer,

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

"The fact that you would GO THERE,says a lot about you."

Words are one thing action is another. I haven't done anything. But you on the other hand have with your rabid accusations and attempts at character assassination.

In all honesty I would never go there.

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

Harry thats good advice. But I know full well that Tiredofits whole point is to a rise out of people.

I know thats his game now because of a couple of questions he wouldn't answer. His silence spoke for him.

I can discuss any issue in a civil manner.

But when people like him roam these threads. No civil discussion can take place.

We've tried to have a nice rational discussion with Tiredofit to no avail.

From the first moment he laid eyes on our posts. His mind was made up about us and he responded accordingly.

But when he made fun of me because of my lack of math skills when I spoke about it. That was personal....

Posted 44 days ago.

harryanderson

You've been asked to define what you mean by proof.

Posted 44 days ago.

harryanderson

That last statement makes no sense. Since you avoid providing an answer to my simple question, I'll take it to mean that you're not willing to accept scientific evidence.

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

Did I state that you was one yet? Umm no I did not.

I simply asked if you would like me to ...call you...a child molester in lieu of you stating that I am a socialist.

You know exchange one baseless accusation for another.

You chuck a rock at me I'll chuck it right back. Might even grab a bigger one too.

Posted 44 days ago.

harryanderson

"Harry, you cannot have a scientific discussion without provable scientific FACT."

Are you ready to accept scientific evidence? Yes or no?

Posted 44 days ago.

harryanderson

"I know full well that I am and that makes me dig in even harder."

A little friendly advice is in order.

Your digging results a deeper hole. And you know what's in the ground. The sewer.

Those in the sewer want to get you to jump in with them. They'll call you names, hoping to get you mad enough to reciprocate, then they'll howl because you called them names.

Posted 44 days ago.

harryanderson

Again, myth

There's no sense in getting frustrated with a person who won't accept scientific evidence when that person has said, "It's not a scientific discussion."

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

"Myth,

You aren't very smart sometimes. Can't you see that you're being baited?"Harry

I know full well that I am and that makes me dig in even harder.

I'm just seeing how long it takes for him to give up this flaccid crusade of his.

I hope he's having fun. Strangely you'd think he would have grow TIRED OF IT by now.

Bwhaahahahahahahah! (slaps knee)

Posted 44 days ago.

harryanderson

I didn't blame you. You trap is obvious. I blame myth for being naive enough to fall into it.

Posted 44 days ago.

harryanderson

Wise up, Myth. He's stated that scientific proof means nothing to him. He doesn't think it's a scientific discussion. He's been honest about it.

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

Hey Tiredofit how do you reconcile the dishonest tactic of intentionally denying that someone has provided a truthful statement and has provided the requested information in spades in the past with being a god fearing man?

You see thats what ******me off. I know that we have provided truthful information. But you will never acknowledge that we did.

Do you think Jesus would look kindly on that sort of behaviour?

Posted 44 days ago.

harryanderson

Myth,

You aren't very smart sometimes. Can't you see that you're being baited?

Posted 44 days ago.

harryanderson

Sorry. That last post should read, "2/3 of Republican-leaning voters say we should reduce our use of fossil fuels.

The propagandists have been unable to change physics. As Heartland honcho Joe Bast admitted, "the scientific debate is of enormous frustration."

That's why they attack climate science and climate scientists. It doesn't factor into their decision-making process. To them, "it's a political agenda, not a scientific discussion." No amount of scientific evidence will sway someone who won't consider it.

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

Hey Tiredofit. I've hit a new low eh?

Well I guess if one is going to wrestle with pigs...one has to be willing to get dirty.

Say "debating" with you is a lot like trying to catch a greased pig.

Intentionally made slippery so as to not be captured?

Yep thats a lot like you.

Posted 44 days ago.

harryanderson

And 2/3 of Republicans say we should reduce our dependence on fossil fuels.

Even Exxon and Shell now admit that greenhouse gases are changing the climate.

The counter climate change propagandists grow more and more irrelevant.

Posted 44 days ago.

mythravere

" I don't understand why they don't give up their socialist views and posts, if they don't want to be called socialists.' Ithink.

Dang that sounds kinda like those ISIS terrorists.

Convert or die?

Oh wait. One of the Duck Dynasty podunks suggested that those ISIS folks should set down and find Jesus(conversion).

Aaaah So much alike.

Surprised we have seen our own Jihadists blowing crap up over here yet.

Posted 44 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or