Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
seconds ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

Harry you are being bested, come on

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

Can we agree both are accurate?

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

Their excuse for the absence of warming over the past 17 years is that the heat is hiding in the deep ocean. However, this is simply an admission that the models fail to simulate the exchanges of heat between the surface layers and the deeper oceans. However, it is this heat transport that plays a major role in natural internal variability of climate, and the IPCC assertions that observed warming can be attributed to man depend crucially on their assertion that these models accurately simulate natural internal variability. Thus, they now, somewhat obscurely, admit that their crucial assumption was totally unjustified

IS THIS ALSO Accurate

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

Gotcha Harry

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

You cannot pull your craphouse lawyer stuff with me Harry

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

Now you are saying that the good DR is right about CO2, why is he wrong here???

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

Their excuse for the absence of warming over the past 17 years is that the heat is hiding in the deep ocean. However, this is simply an admission that the models fail to simulate the exchanges of heat between the surface layers and the deeper oceans. However, it is this heat transport that plays a major role in natural internal variability of climate, and the IPCC assertions that observed warming can be attributed to man depend crucially on their assertion that these models accurately simulate natural internal variability. Thus, they now, somewhat obscurely, admit that their crucial assumption was totally unjustified

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

Is the rest of his statement accurate?

Posted 3 days ago.

harryanderson

Quite, myth.

You were certainly right when you said he would never accept proof. He asked and I provided. He would neither accept nor reject it.

I do think you're smart about this: You're smart enough to weigh evidence before you make a decision.

And that makes you a lot smarter than a lot of others. Some won't even weigh the evidence they asked for.

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

I only ask, if I am supposed to accept his view on CO2 being a greenhouse gas. why wont Harry accept the rest of his statement.

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

Yes Myth you are NOT very smart but you are also a twisted sick jerk.

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

If I am to accept the words of the good DR Will you not do the same?

Posted 3 days ago.

mythravere

Harry you said sometimes I am not smart. Thats fine. But you do realize that tiredofit will never give you a straight answer on anything.

He'll just move the goal posts.

So just saying. You might want to use the advice you gave me.

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

So if one is true, both are true

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

How can you say one is fact an the other not

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

From the exact asme source, is it accurate if not why not

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

Their excuse for the absence of warming over the past 17 years is that the heat is hiding in the deep ocean. However, this is simply an admission that the models fail to simulate the exchanges of heat between the surface layers and the deeper oceans. However, it is this heat transport that plays a major role in natural internal variability of climate, and the IPCC assertions that observed warming can be attributed to man depend crucially on their assertion that these models accurately simulate natural internal variability. Thus, they now, somewhat obscurely, admit that their crucial assumption was totally unjustified

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

DO YOU accept what I posted as fact?

Posted 3 days ago.

harryanderson

I'm confused. You said, "No, Harry." Does that mean you don't believe Dr. Lindzen is right when he says CO2 is a greenhouse gas?

Posted 3 days ago.

Tiredofit

Same source be consistent

Posted 3 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or