Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 days ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

"In a condemnatory speech last week against the Obama administration’s new Environmental Protection Agency carbon emission regulations, Kentucky state Sen. Brandon Smith (R) claimed that man-made climate change is scientifically implausible because Mars and Earth share “exactly” the same temperature."

OMG! LOL!

So Tiredofit do you agree with what he said?

Whoo Boy the face of stupid right thar.

Posted 19 days ago.

Tiredofit

That's fine, I really don't need to know.

Posted 25 days ago.

Kendall78

Not a difficult question, tell me why you want to know if I had a Govt job or if I have NOT had one. If you don't wish to answer fine but I'm not going to answer til you do.

Posted 26 days ago.

Kendall78

"WHY would one have to go to such lengths if there was not something to hide"

Probably because they are not hiding anything and you just won't accept their findings.

"Secondly I doubt the FOIA request would do much good outside the US"

The conversation was mostly about NOAA which is within the US. Focus Danielsan...focus.

Posted 26 days ago.

Tiredofit

So you have never actualy seen the data that you SOOOOO believe. You take the readers digest version that others provide you. Yea slave to science that's you allright.

Posted 26 days ago.

mythravere

When I used 110% it meant that you go above and beyond in regards to your bias toward climate change.

In other words your bias is in the realm of irrationality.

Posted 26 days ago.

Tiredofit

Not a difficult question, you have either had a Govt job or you have NOT had one. If you don't wish to answer fine.

Posted 26 days ago.

Tiredofit

Freedom of information act???? WHY would one have to go to such lengths if there was not something to hide, Secondly I doubt the FOIA request would do much good outside the US, use your head.

Posted 26 days ago.

Kendall78

"There will be no raw data from this supposed NASSA mission"

You doubt NASA when they said they sent a satellite up?

"Just like he IPCC hides its raw data so shall this be"

I am certain that under the freedom of information Act, if you want to see the data you can. Try and find out and report back to us.

"Have you ever worked a Govt job?"

Again...why is this relevant?

Posted 26 days ago.

Tiredofit

There will be no raw data from this supposed NASSA mission, only interpretation. Just like he IPCC hides its raw data so shall this be

Posted 26 days ago.

Tiredofit

Have you ever worked a Govt job>?

Posted 26 days ago.

Tiredofit

I could only be 100 percent anything, but I digress

Posted 26 days ago.

Tiredofit

Myth, 110% is not possible, but math was never your strong point.

Posted 26 days ago.

Kendall78

"And when a person's opinion is that biased you'll never be able to convince them otherwise."

I have no desire to change his mind. I just like to get his opinions written down so when he is proven wrong, he cannot deny it later.

Posted 26 days ago.

Kendall78

"Have you ever worked a Govt job?"

Why is that relevant to all this?

Posted 26 days ago.

mythravere

Like I have said before. You can lay every single fact on the table. Tiredofit and his ilk will just deny all of it.

Posted 26 days ago.

mythravere

And when a person's opinion is that biased you'll never be able to convince them otherwise.

Posted 26 days ago.

mythravere

The only thing Tiredofit will accept as fact on this issue is information that shows that scientists are lying about it and that its all a hoax.

He is diametrically opposed to this issue.

He is 110% biased against mans role in changing our climate.

Nothing can convince him that it is real.

Posted 26 days ago.

Tiredofit

Have you ever worked a Govt job?

Posted 26 days ago.

Kendall78

"SO its sorta important."

I'm not saying it's not noteworthy or anything. But unless you actually have real examples where NOAA has done these theoretical exagerrations...you have nothing.

"There is NO WAY that the data will say.."

All I care to see from that satellite is information on whether CO2 effects the way our atmosphere absorbs the energy from the Sun. And whether yes or no, that the public accept the findings. Denial in the face of hard facts (no matter the side of the argument) is pitiful.

Posted 26 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or