Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 day ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

Why Do AGW Climate Scientists Feel The Need To Exaggerate or Lie? A Climate Scientist Exposes The Truth

Posted 110 days ago.

Tiredofit

Global Temperature Update: No global warming at all for 17 years 8 months – No Warming Since August 1996

Posted 110 days ago.

Tiredofit

From Gawker, this is pretty scary but that's exactly where the left wants to go.

Man-made climate change happens. Man-made climate change kills a lot of people. It's going to kill a lot more. We have laws on the books to punish anyone whose lies contribute to people's deaths. It's time to punish the climate-change liars.

Posted 110 days ago.

Tiredofit

A new peer-reviewed paper published in the American Journal of Agricultural Economics, titled “Information Manipulation and Climate Agreements”, is openly providing a “rationale” for global warming proponents to engage in mendacious claims in order to further their cause.

The paper appears to support or provide a formula for why lying or “information manipulation” is able to further the cause of man-made global warming and “enhance global welfare.” The authors use a mathematical formula to study information tactics.

The authors, Assistant Professors of Economics Fuhai Hong and Xiaojian Zhao, note how the media and environmental groups “exaggerate” global warming and then the offer their paper to “provide a rationale for this tendency” to exaggerate for the good of the cause.

Posted 110 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is no proof. You don't understand a single bit of what you regurgitate here. There is no proof whatsoever that man changes the climate. PERIOD.

Posted 110 days ago.

mythravere

What is the point in taking the time and explaining something to someone who has already made their mind up...and can not nor will not concede the truth in any facts put on the table?

Posted 111 days ago.

Kendall78

You are however incorrect with your notion. Unless of course you mean the daily weather collected from ever area on the planet, every day and add to all that such things like atmospheric partical counts and soil moisture.

Is that what you meant or did you just mean what ol Kirk Greenfield tells you on the tube?

Posted 111 days ago.

Tiredofit

Well Kendall, what is climate that spans decades if not a collection of daily weather?

Posted 111 days ago.

Kendall78

"They cannot predict next week's weather.."

What does weekly weather predictions have to do with global climate change that spans decades?

Posted 111 days ago.

luvthesouth

mythravere, good afternoon. from what i have read the wind has the greatest impact on not only the gulf stream but all water currents. density is another factor as well as compression and expansion due to land masses. lessening the salt concentration would decrease the density of the ocean waters which would affect the currents. i have yet to research what the tipping point in salt concentration would actually be to radically change any ocean current. thnaks for the subject matter. hi there harry and tiredofit. forgive any poor spelling...i do not have my good eyes on at the moment.

Posted 111 days ago.

harryanderson

mythravere,

You do a decent job handling the constant bullying and taunting to which you're subjected.

Like my Granny used to say--Don't let 'em know where your goat's tied up.

Posted 111 days ago.

Tiredofit

What exactly have the predicted that was correct? Doesnt matter, the lemmings still follow.

Posted 111 days ago.

Tiredofit

What a crock. They cannot predict next week's weather with any accuracy yet we have a mathematicaly challenged poster telling us how the world will be. And yes climate is a weather average.

Posted 111 days ago.

mythravere

Now far off into the future would be things like oceanic currents being upset by increasing amounts of fresh water getting into the oceans from melting icecaps.

The Gulf Stream affects the weather of Europe. It helps keep the UK warmer than it would normally be.

If that current would shut down do to a salinity difference in the oceanic conveyor then that would cause problems.

Thats a far off problem.

Posted 111 days ago.

mythravere

Truthfully when I used "pipe" it was the just the first thing I thought about when composing my post.

But now that you mention it I think that we will see as the world gets warmer our weather patterns will become more erratic from year to year.

One thing coming down the pipe is more precipitation. Since a warmer atmosphere causes more evaporation the atmosphere will become loaded with more moisture. Thats gotta come out somewhere.

Thats what I was talking about.

Posted 111 days ago.

RANDOM21

Why do you use "pipe" and not "pike"? Pike refers to something unknown away off in the future, while pipe refers to something already in the system about to emerge. Just wondering.

Posted 111 days ago.

mythravere

There is some truth to that. Look at hurricanes. I think scientists were banking on the storms becoming more numerous...but that didn't happen.

They know the world is warming up. They know the cause. And they know some of the effects of thats coming down the pipe of a warmer world.

What they don't know is how its going to go down in the near term.

Posted 111 days ago.

h ttp://****climatedepot.c om/2014/04/03/green-guru-jame s-lovelock-on-climate-change-i-dont-think-anybody-really-knows-whats-happening-they-just-guess-lovelock-reverses-himself-on-global-warming/

" Green Guru James Lovelock on Climate Change: ‘I don’t think anybody really knows what’s happening. They just guess’ – Lovelock Reverses Himself on Global Warming "

Posted 112 days ago.

mythravere

Oh yea insert math based insult directed at me etc whatever who cares yada yada and all that.

Posted 112 days ago.

mythravere

Well since you can't/refuse to understand climate science I'm pretty sure you won't have any understanding on the implications of population density on human behavior.

Posted 112 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or