Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
13 hours ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

Go ahead and fill pages with your idiotic droning ! Deny , deflect all you want but there it is in black and white !

Posted 12 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Here is the research you deny exists ! !!! research that is not funded by our government ! ~~~~The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

Charles Krauthammer: Environmentalism is the new socialism

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

Eco-socialists are critical of many past and existing forms of both Green politics and socialism. They are often described as "Red Greens" - adherents to Green politics with clear anti-capitalist views, often inspired by Marxism (Red Greens are in contrast to eco-capitalists and Green anarchists).

The term "watermelon" is commonly applied, often pejoratively, to Greens who seem to put "social justice" goals above ecological ones, implying they are "green on the outside but red on the inside"; the term is usually attributed to either Petr Beckmann or, more frequently, Warren T. Brookes,[2][3][4] both critics of environmentalism, and is common in Australia,[5][6] New Zealand[7] and the United States.[8]

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

No, Really, the ‘Debate is Over’: EnvironMental Scientist on PBS Calls for Jailing ‘Climate Deniers’

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

The 'false narrative' of global warming

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

The bigger the lie, the easier it is sometimes to pull it off, but this is just plain ridiculous. Can someone please answer this: How did man cause the last major Ice Age 10,000 years ago, or the warming period following it or even the Little Ice Age that began the Dark Ages? By the sheer axis of this great planet, there has been, and always will be, climate change. And surprise, sometimes the weather patterns will be violent. Man is no more the cause of this than he is for sun spots.

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

HMMMm looks like the debate ISNT over. #noproof

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

Scientific fact: There has been no increase in the world's average temperature over the last 17 years..

The people who have been so successful in advancing the progressive-communist agenda by using the global warming farce have switched gears to try to confuse the public by now calling it climate change. Climate change as a man-made disaster is even more of a joke than the false narrative of man-made global warming. How can there be man-made global warming if there hasn't even been global warming?

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

UN climate chief: Communism is best to fight global warming

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

Climate Change and Environmental Socialism

TOWHHALL, good read

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

Keep explaining WHY you WONT give proof lol its very enlightening to all

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

Moreover, since that period we have had a number of ice ages, cold periods, and warmer periods in between that could not have been caused by any man-made greenhouse gas effects, and certainly not by man-made CO2

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

Carbon dioxide is a common substance in the universe, and has apparently existed ever since the earth and planets were formed. There is carbon dioxide on Mars, Venus, and other planets, as well as on Earth.[14] The article referred to is a U. S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) article. NOAA has been one of the proponents of man-made global warming. It is interesting that the article also refers to the greenhouse gas effect of CO2 on Venus and Mars, as well as on earth. It also states that astronomers believe that the greenhouse gas effect, due to CO2 was stronger 4.5 billion years ago than it is today. It is quite obvious that any greenhouse gas effect back at that time, or on Venus and Mars today, could not be driven by our industry, cars, and airplanes. It is contradictory to the idea of man-made global warming.

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

We see that the correlation between CO2 and temperature is no more significant today than it was ages back when there were no automobiles and industry. The author also goes into the effects of the ocean and sunspots. Lansner's conclusion is that CO2 rises do not cause the temperature rises, but follows them – "The well known Temperature-CO2 relation with temperature as a driver of CO2 is easily shown."

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

New Evidence That Man-Made Carbon Dioxide (CO2)

Does Not Cause Global Warming

Posted 12 days ago.

Tiredofit

Global climate changes have been far more intense (12 to 20 times as intense in some cases) than the global warming of the past century, and they took place in as little as 20–100 years. Global warming of the past century (0.8° C) is virtually insignificant when compared to the magnitude of at least 10 global climate changes in the past 15,000 years. None of these sudden global climate changes could possibly have been caused by human CO2 input to the atmosphere because they all took place long before anthropogenic CO2 emissions began. The cause of the ten earlier ‘natural’ climate changes was most likely the same as the cause of global warming from 1977 to 1998.

Posted 12 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Also, Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ???? Are you ashamed ??

Posted 12 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Look it up for yourself !Not funded by the USA and reaches the same conclusions that most other researchers have found !Deny , deflect and lie, lie, lie ! A true republican talking head !

Posted 12 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Here you go tiredbrain ,ONE MORE TIME !!! research that is not funded by our government ! ~~~~The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia

Posted 12 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or