Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
9 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

You are in the minority, and that's a good thing

Posted 138 days ago.

Kendall78

"You will ignore anything that doesnt support your desire to give more of your freedom to govt."

I have ignored nothing. You just are not convincing in your rants.

I never once said we should give any freedoms away. You are reaching.

Posted 138 days ago.

Tiredofit

Noaa climate project manager admits climate scientists exagerate to gain funding and attention so yes I do have a reasonable doubt

Posted 138 days ago.

Tiredofit

You will ignore anything that doesnt support your desire to give more of your freedom to govt. That's fine. Cannot say I understand it but I guess that's your thing

Posted 138 days ago.

Kendall78

"ever heard of climategate??????"

Yep..a tired old smokeless gun that has nothing to do with the scientists we are talking about.

Posted 138 days ago.

Kendall78

"Noaa now there is a unbiased source."

You have any reason based on fact instead of ignorance not to trust them?

Posted 138 days ago.

Tiredofit

ever heard of climategate??????

Posted 138 days ago.

Kendall78

"The figures reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012 there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures"

This is funny. You say that the temp isn't going higher while ignoring that the average for this timeframe is in fact higher than any 17 year swath since 1850.

Answer this truthfully if you are able, is the last 17 years average temp higher than the 17 years prior to it?

Posted 138 days ago.

Kendall78

"So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today’s world, this is the only way to assure any political action.."

You have no evidence that the climate scientists in question have exaggerated anything.

You have no evidence that the climate scientists in question put out any info to get political action.

Posted 138 days ago.

Tiredofit

CNSNews****) –  Global temperatures collected in five official databases confirm that there has been no statistically significant global warming for the past 17 years, according to Dr. John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama Huntsville (UAH)

Posted 138 days ago.

Tiredofit

The figures reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012 there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures This means that the ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996

Posted 138 days ago.

Tiredofit

Btw I didn't make up the cow f,art story, it's science for Pete's sake

Posted 138 days ago.

Tiredofit

Kendall it's not I that demonstrates his ignorance, it's you and your ilk.

Posted 138 days ago.

Tiredofit

Monika admits they exaggerate to gain funding and attention, she is the noaa climate project manager.

Posted 138 days ago.

Tiredofit

Noaa now there is a unbiased source. Nice one

Posted 138 days ago.

Tiredofit

Thanks for quoting NOAA it gives me another chance to post this............The problem is, only sensational exaggeration makes the kind of story that will get politicians’ — and readers’ — attention. So, yes, climate scientists might exaggerate, but in today’s world, this is the only way to assure any political action and thus more federal financing to reduce the scientific uncertainty.

MONIKA KOPACZ Applied Mathematics and Atmospheric Sciences Harvard University Cambridge, Mass.naoo climate project manager

Posted 138 days ago.

Kendall78

As for understanding what causes global warming, you again are showing your ignorance about your fellow commentators on here. Many things attribute to global climate change. History shows that polar ice, oceanic flow and temp and particulate content all contribute to global climate change.

Do you have any non-political reasons (meaning scientific) that makes you doubt these factors, among others, don't effect global climate change?

Posted 138 days ago.

Kendall78

Tired, you don't understand a single bit of what you regurgitate here.

I would also caution you about trusting the views of the public. Prior to December 1941, the US public wasn't very interested in the Japanese Empire.

Posted 138 days ago.

Kendall78

"NASA scientists say 2013 tied with 2009 and 2006 for the seventh warmest year since 1880, continuing a long-term trend of rising global temperatures." (w w w.arctic.noaa.gov/detect/global-temps.sh tml

Posted 138 days ago.

Tiredofit

Well if you are expert on anything Myth it would be which end of a cow causes global warming, LOL ha hahahahahaha bwaaaaaaaa pretty immature huh?

Posted 138 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or