Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 hours ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

OK HARRY if its a statistical tie then DO TELL how they ranked them?

Posted 223 days ago.

Stillhere

Schooling me? lololo no lad, you were schooled about margins of errors and you refuse to answer the question as it blows your claim right out of the water.

Posted 223 days ago.

harryanderson

A statistical tie is not an absolute tie.

Now I'm done schooling you for now.

Posted 223 days ago.

harryanderson

100 is greater than 99.99, but not by much. It's a statistical tie. Very simple.

Posted 223 days ago.

harryanderson

Easy. It happens all the time. No controversy about that.

Posted 223 days ago.

Stillhere

Funny you avoid the questions.

Posted 223 days ago.

Stillhere

please read for comprehension, HOW CAN THREE THINGS THAT ARE STATISTICAL TIE BE RANKED BY TEMPERATURE?

Posted 223 days ago.

harryanderson

Check it, and then tell us what the very first sentence in the abstract says.

Posted 223 days ago.

harryanderson

Did you check my source, stillhere?

Posted 223 days ago.

Stillhere

Once again you may avoid the question, WHAT IS THE MARGIN OF ERROR?

Posted 223 days ago.

Stillhere

YOU HARRY posted the claim that 2014 was the warmest ever and yet when pressed you call it quibbling?

Posted 223 days ago.

Stillhere

Much like your cherry picked 97% you don't like the details do you?

Posted 223 days ago.

harryanderson

It shows your desperation that you quibble over which year was warmest by a very small amount. Here's the real relevant statistic from the paper:

"The fifteen warmest years all occurred since 1998."

Posted 223 days ago.

Stillhere

Back to my question, what is the margin of error??????? Its RIGHT THERE on the Nassa site

Posted 223 days ago.

Stillhere

How does one rank three items that are a statistical tie?

Posted 223 days ago.

Stillhere

Harry is getting snarky lolol

Posted 223 days ago.

Stillhere

can be considered to be in a statistical tie

DO TELL ME HOW ONE IS WARMER IN A TIE?

Posted 223 days ago.

Stillhere

Well I guess you cannot back up your claim that 2014 was the warmest on record. OK my work is done for now

Posted 223 days ago.

harryanderson

Please learn how to read with understanding.

“The three warmest years in the GISTEMP analysis, 2014, 2010, and 2005 IN THAT ORDER, can be considered to be in a statistical tie because of several sources of uncertainty."(emphasis added)

Posted 223 days ago.

Stillhere

If the increase is .02 C and the margin of error is .1 c how can that be scientific proof of anything?

Posted 223 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or