Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 hours ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

That only shows you have none

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Try me myth. If you have proof I will admit it. Go

Posted 10 days ago.

mythravere

I'll say again. Our proof has already been outlined. Its in the comments scattered throughout this forum topic.

If you want them go reread all those posts.

But you won't you are just going to repeatedly ask for proof.

But thats ok. I can just as well refer you to the previous comments. Which is what I am going to do. Each and every time you ask.

Posted 10 days ago.

mythravere

"You are being laid bare with a simple question, thank you for representing your side so poorly.:)"

There is only one thing being laid bare. And its your dishonesty.

You are hiding behind a question.

Also any proof put on the table will be rejected no matter what..by you.

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Man I bet that browser is smoking looking for that magical proof. Good luck

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

It should be easy to provide a litany of PROOF with all the emotional crap you have spewed on the subject but when challenged directly, You fold like a cheap camera.

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

You are being laid bare with a simple question, thank you for representing your side so poorly.:)

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

If it's soo settled, how about ONE provable fact showing man causes a change in the climate

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Billions in purchased science and not a lick of proof, can we get a refund?

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

The fact is you have nothing and you know it.For your ilk, the ends justify the means and even without proof you just think it would be a good idea lolklk

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Lord you are bereft of proof

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Come on lay it out there quit being so cowardly

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Where is your PROOF that the recent warming , which has ceased, is a result of mankind???? Lolwell

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Cannot prove a negative, geez you are dense lol

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

I think it's a provable fact that man had no SUVS or coal powered plants during the glacial period.

Posted 10 days ago.

Kendall78

Wouldn't it better serve your argument if you would prove your belief that the current climate change is due to a natural cycle devoid of unnatrual causes.

Posted 10 days ago.

Kendall78

"Was man burning fossil fuels in the last ice age?"

You tell us, you seem to be an expert on what was or wasn't...lol.

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Was man burning fossil fuels in the last ice age?

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Wouldn't it better serve your argument to debate your PROOF vs whether you had any?

Posted 10 days ago.

Kendall78

"but I CAN prove it was not manmade co2"

You can prove something was "NOT" the cause of something?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Oh my gosh you are a card Tired. You rant on and on for multiple pages saying you cannot prove a negative and then you say something stupid like that.

Posted 10 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or