Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
1 hour ago.
by Tiredofit
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

You are so funny Tired. We have asked you and whomever else is on your side of the argument for any proof of your argument. You give none and then want others to provide you with info. You are so intellectually lazy.

At least Greek makes an attempt and I can respect that.

Posted 18 days ago.

Tiredofit

Still waiting for one verifiable provable fact that proves man is causing climate change. Just one.

You claim to have all this proof

You waste page after page making excuses as to why you will not give one example.

Hmm

Posted 18 days ago.

Ohwiseone

I would like to see the facts you're working from !

Posted 18 days ago.

Tiredofit

mythravere Squirrels also have no role in changing the climate.

I agree with that comment.

Posted 18 days ago.

Tiredofit

Can you prove that theory MYTH>???>>

Posted 18 days ago.

Tiredofit

Oh god you ******* dumbass.

I'm gonna go out on a limb here that since squirrels live in trees and areas with lots of plants and such. I am betting their meager output of co2 is taken up by the plants in their local environment before it can harm the climate. Not that they could anyways.

So I guess I just played your game again.

Posted 8 days ago. »

Posted 18 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Oh that's right , that would be an inconvenience !

Posted 18 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Where does Faux get their "research" ?????? Who funds that ????? Who's agenda are they following ????? And most of all Who's agenda are you following ???? Since you all are holding to the official Faux news line-o crap I would like to see the facts you're working from !

Posted 18 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Yes Myth , who would know more about lying than tiredbrain ! What a tool !

Posted 18 days ago.

Kendall78

"Warming has ceased in the last 15- 17 years."

Be more specific if you can. Do you mean warming has ceased in the atmosphere? In the Oceans?

Is the last 17 years warmer than the 17 years that came before it?

You still haven't defined what you will consider proof in these arguments. Don't you know what you will consider proof?

Posted 18 days ago.

Kendall78

"Show me how to prove a negative"

No one has asked you to prove a negative.

Is this your fallback plan? Keep claiming it's proving the negative so you won't have to do anything?

Posted 18 days ago.

Kendall78

"And this schmuck says he's interested in honest debate?"

He constantly lies.

Lol, it does seem like he has confusion over what proof and truth is.

Posted 18 days ago.

Tiredofit

Lets walk down that road myth this will be fun, for me at least.

Posted 18 days ago.

Tiredofit

Show me how to prove a negative by either proving squirrels don't cause climate change or there is no God. Go

Posted 18 days ago.

Tiredofit

I can show you if you are thinking of lying.

Posted 18 days ago.

Tiredofit

Myth did you not agree that squirrels were not responsible for climate change?

Posted 18 days ago.

Tiredofit

Not one more iota of proof will be given to you unless you backup your own claims. Lol massive cop out.

That's hilarious myth no soup for you lolol

Posted 18 days ago.

Tiredofit

Climate Craziness of the week: “We Have Five Years to Stop Building Coal Plants and Gas-Powered Cars” Anthony Watts / 3 hours ago September 12, 2014

Posted 18 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Come on ,Prove to me that this study is biased ! Just one fact , that's all I ask for !!! I didn't think so !

Posted 18 days ago.

Ohwiseone

research that is not funded by our government ! ~~~~The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia

Posted 18 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or