Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

You say fear is the reason I believe in climate change.

Why would I let the fear of climate change control me when I don't let the fear of eternal damnation control me?

Posted 137 days ago.

mythravere

Which god is in charge of all things Tiredofit?

You speak of fear being used to sway people to the side of those who tout climate change.

But yet you fail to realize that fear of eternal torture in a fiery pit is the main thing that keeps the majority of people from questioning the validity of god.

Posted 137 days ago.

Kendall78

"THIS IS LIKE DEBATING A CHILD"

Says the person who is screaming like a baby. Learn basic internet courtesy.

Posted 137 days ago.

Kendall78

"Sorry Kendell the only way to quantify science is by math...Period."

No it's not. Math is a tool of science.

Posted 137 days ago.

Kendall78

"Oh geez lack of hurricanes is climate change, cold weather is global warming,"

What is one of the requirements of an Atlantic Hurricane? Warm waters yes? But if the Gulf Stream's flow is altered by the melting of the Arctic Ice caps, does it not stand to reason that could effect hurricanes?

Regional cold weather can be an effect from global factors as overall warming. Is it not reasonable that the jet streams that goes across the world and effect weather patterns would be effected by increase temps?

Posted 137 days ago.

Kendall78

"If co2 caused the to warm then one would expect warming over the last 16 years.."

Your knowledge on climate change is quite limited isn't it Tired? No one, not one person, has put the CO2 levels as the one and only factor for climate change.

You also seem to have a mental block when it comes to the years prior to 17 years ago and back. You do realize that the study of climate change and global warming is older than 2 decades right?

Posted 137 days ago.

moderation

Tired- was GOD it charge of that mudslide in the great northwest?

Posted 137 days ago.

moderation

Tired- was GOD it charge of that mudslide in the great northwest?

Posted 137 days ago.

Tiredofit

You made no points worth addressing, being a fraud, I don't have much value for anything you post as it's mostly untrue

Posted 137 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry i didn't name call I simply stated a fact. You are indeed a fraud and you know it. You call people deniers who don't buy the socialists lies yet you deny science daily when it suits you. That makes you a fraud. A local republican fraud

Posted 137 days ago.

harryanderson

Like Heartland honcho Joe Bast said, “…the scientific debate is of enormous frustration for us.”

Posted 137 days ago.

harryanderson

Ithink,

The allocation of scarce water resources has nothing to do with causing a drought. A drought happen when little or no precipitation occurs.

Posted 137 days ago.

harryanderson

You proved my point, Tiredofit. Because you can't address the points I made, you get frustrated and start with the name-calling.

Posted 137 days ago.

California's drought is caused by the bleeding hearts bleeding over a pathetic "minnow". If only we humans could be that important.

Posted 137 days ago.

Tiredofit

the fraud speaks. The supposed ‘consensus’ on man-made global warming is facing an inconvenient challenge after the release of new temperature data showing the planet has not warmed for the past 15 years.

The figures suggest that we could even be heading for a mini ice age to rival the 70-year temperature drop that saw frost fairs held on the Thames in the 17th Century.

Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit. It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.

Posted 137 days ago.

harryanderson

Those who claim there has been no warming in 16 years either don't use elementary statistical analysis.

Politifact rated Patrick Moore’s statement that “the earth has not warmed in 17 years” and found it “mostly false.”

ww w.politifact.co m/punditfact/statements/2014/mar/17/patrick-moore/climate-change-skeptic-patrick-moore-says-earth-ha/

For at least 3 reasons, Tiredofit’s statement isn’t true. First, 1998 was an outlier year with a strong El Nino. In discussing trends, statisticians who want to be truthful don’t pick outliers for the baseline. Second, both 2005 and 2010 were warmer than 1998. Third, the first decade of the 20th century was the warmest on record.

Those who feel frustrated in arguments often employ pejoratives like “imbecile” and “short bus” and “fool.” Frankly, it reveals more about their characters than the characters of those whom they disparage.

Posted 137 days ago.

Tiredofit

I almost pity you Myth, if not for your arrogant ignorance I would.. What you fail to understand is that GOD is in charge of all things including the climate of the earth, not Govt nor man. Sad that you search for answers in the wrong place.

Posted 137 days ago.

mythravere

"So you admit you don't have the first clue and no one can say what will happen yet you want action????"

Never admitted anything.

I don't want action. There's nothing we can do about it in my opinion except be flexible and adapt accordingly.

Posted 137 days ago.

RANDOM21

It's a nice day. Go out and enjoy it before the weather changes to rain, or snow, or not. Reduction of co2 will inherently cause an upward shift in the cost of energy across the spectrum. This increased cot will result in reduction of power used because people that are not subsidized by the government will use less. The poor folk won't change their usage as the taxpayer helps with their bills, the rich won't use less because they can afford to pay. But, once again, we in the middle will be squeezed by the increase and tough decisions we will have to make. Unless you are not rich or poor you don't have a dog in this hunt. Go out and breath some fresh air before your neighbor exhales and pollutes some more.

Posted 137 days ago.

mythravere

Two decades ago the northern ice cap was a lot more widespread.

So much so that no routes were being looked at as possible seasonal shipping routes for commerce.

So much so that neither the USA or Russia seen it as necessary to start laying claim to areas for resource extraction under the waters the normally would have had ice flows over it.

Yep no warming in two decades.

Then why is the ice thinning out and routes opening up?

Posted 137 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or