Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 hours ago.
by Tiredofit
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

Tiredofit

Did I state anything that was untrue? Oh yeah !!! Either way you want it tirebrain ! If you were truly a "shop steward" your representation would have been grounds for dismissal and then theres the other side of it ! You're probably just another republican liar who claims to be a steward from a Canadian union and wouldn't know the truth if it bit it on the arse !

Posted 10 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit I bet you're just a cranky old man set in his ways thats so politicized you think a commie is around every corner.

Why do you even post about this issue. You not trying to change anyones mind? So why do it.

If you wanted to change minds then you'd have to back up what you say wouldn't you? But thats not how you roll?

Posted 10 days ago.

mythravere

The words of the scientists are neutral. Doesn't matter where those words are posted at.

Its not like you would even consider their veracity anyways.

Posted 10 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit you don't state anything. Thats part of your game plan. All you do is deny deny deny.

And those "pics" from what I could tell in just a quick search are photoshops. Meaning someone made it up. Who? I have no idea.

Posted 10 days ago.

Kendall78

"Cook is an activist and looks great in his Nazi uniform."

What does this have anything to do with climate change science and data?

Can you show that Cook's views are actually skewed or are you practicing the art of implication without facts again?

Posted 10 days ago.

Kendall78

(From the BBC) "Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere between 2012 and 2013 grew at their fastest rate since 1984."

"The WMO's annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin doesn't measure emissions from power station smokestacks but instead records how much of the warming gases remain in the atmosphere after the complex interactions that take place between the air, the land and the oceans."

""The climate system is not linear, it is not straightforward. It is not necessarily reflected in the temperature in the atmosphere, but if you look at the temperature profile in the ocean, the heat is going in the oceans," said Oksana Tarasova, chief of the atmospheric research division at the WMO."

Posted 10 days ago.

Kendall78

"Was not addressing you Jimmy, pay attention."

Learn to quote and do citations properly then. Any high schooler could do that, so I have hope you might be able to do it as well.

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Cook is an activist and looks great in his Nazi uniform. Have you see those pics

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Correct me if I am wrong but wasn't it you that claimed only certain sites, those deemed neutral by you , would be read?

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Did I state anything that was untrue?

Posted 10 days ago.

mythravere

Its a fact the you Tiredofit. No matter what facts are sent your way. No matter how concisely the case is laid out.

You just can not admit its real.

And its all because of the political aspect of this issue.

Its you versus the lefties isn't it?

Posted 10 days ago.

mythravere

"The latest propaganda stunt from the Skeptical Science Kidz is underway and it is about as exciting as it is predictable. Every hour, a new opinion is revealed along with a cartoon climate scientist caricature drawn by former cartoonist turned “climate expert” John Cook."

So with this I must assume that you didn't bother to see whats being said but rather decided to appeal to your chosen authority?

If all you read is what the skeptics say then how are you getting the whole story?

I expected this much.

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Was not addressing you Jimmy, pay attention.

Posted 10 days ago.

Kendall78

I didn't post anything about 97% of anything. Pay attention.

(From the BBC) "Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere between 2012 and 2013 grew at their fastest rate since 1984."

"The WMO's annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin doesn't measure emissions from power station smokestacks but instead records how much of the warming gases remain in the atmosphere after the complex interactions that take place between the air, the land and the oceans."

""The climate system is not linear, it is not straightforward. It is not necessarily reflected in the temperature in the atmosphere, but if you look at the temperature profile in the ocean, the heat is going in the oceans," said Oksana Tarasova, chief of the atmospheric research division at the WMO."

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

97 Hours of Consensus communicates the fact that 97% of climate scientists have concluded that humans are causing global warming

Still selling the lie.

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Isn't John cook the failed cartoonist who likes to wear Nazi uniforms

Posted 10 days ago.

Kendall78

Just wanted to put something a little more relevant to the topic than unions in Canada.

Posted 10 days ago.

Kendall78

(From the BBC) "Concentrations of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere between 2012 and 2013 grew at their fastest rate since 1984."

"The WMO's annual Greenhouse Gas Bulletin doesn't measure emissions from power station smokestacks but instead records how much of the warming gases remain in the atmosphere after the complex interactions that take place between the air, the land and the oceans."

""The climate system is not linear, it is not straightforward. It is not necessarily reflected in the temperature in the atmosphere, but if you look at the temperature profile in the ocean, the heat is going in the oceans," said Oksana Tarasova, chief of the atmospheric research division at the WMO."

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

The latest propaganda stunt from the Skeptical Science Kidz is underway and it is about as exciting as it is predictable. Every hour, a new opinion is revealed along with a cartoon climate scientist caricature drawn by former cartoonist turned “climate expert” John Cook.

Posted 10 days ago.

mythravere

OH MY FREAKING GOODNESS! LOL! What a boon for you Tiredofit.

Google "97 Hours of Consensus"

97 scientists are give 97 reasons why climate change is real over 97 hours.

You wanted proof? There you go. Straight from the scientists themselves.

Now everyone watch as he fumbles around and rejects what they have to say.

Posted 10 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or