Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 hours ago.
by mythravere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

harryanderson

That's the point, Joe Blow. Private enterprise is doing it.

Posted 38 days ago.

JoeBlow

It seems when ever the government is involved in trying to solve problems, they waste the tax payors money and create a bigger problem. If there were a profitable way of doing things, private enterprise would do it.

Posted 38 days ago.

harryanderson

Now here's the kind of small-government solution I like. Several large companies, including Dupont, Coca-Cola, and Kroger have agreed to control how much hydroflourocarbons (HFC) they release into the atmosphere.

HFC's can be 10,000 times as potent a greenhouse gas as CO2.

That's the way it should be done. Individuals and companies stepping up to help solve the problem, instead of denying the problem, which leaves the field open for proponents of big government to impose solutions on us.

And that's not all. Now, in Southern California, developers are building housing tracts with pre-installed solar.

Hooray for these individuals and companies who are leading the way and helping keep government from ordering us around.

Boo to those who deny and ignore the problem, leaving the solutions to big government.

Posted 38 days ago.

Kendall78

"There appears to have been.."

Doesn't he know? No evidence again and just blind guessing.

Tired, your sources have failed. Try again later.

Posted 38 days ago.

Kendall78

"Global warming is the central tenet..."

No evidence just sensationalism.

Posted 38 days ago.

Kendall78

“has actively suppressed research results presented by researchers that do not comply with the dogma of the IPCC.”

No evidence just conspiracy theroies.

Posted 38 days ago.

Kendall78

"I'm not advocating major change.."

No one else is Chicken Little.

Posted 38 days ago.

Kendall78

"his analysis?"

"Analysis- detailed examination of the elements or structure of something, typically as a basis for discussion or interpretation."

Saying basically "no" is not analysis.

Posted 38 days ago.

mythravere

"What high degree have you attained to dismiss his analysis?"Tiredofit

Oh goody. So Tiredofit what qualifications do you have that allow you to dismiss what the climatologists are saying about mans role in climate change?

Posted 38 days ago.

mythravere

"At this stage of the debate (if one would call it that), no one can give you proof you would accept Tired.

That's why we want you to tell us what you would consider proof."

The thing about Tiredofits criteria for proof is that its not set in stone. He's one of those types who likes to move the goal posts.

Like I said. Any proof we provide will be denied by Tiredofit even if it is correct and truthful.

Thats his games plan. His whole point in this debate is to deny everything we say.

Posted 38 days ago.

Kendall78

So a physicist, who is not a climate scientist, goes into full denial mode with no facts.

You know that the "nah" argument isn't really an argument at all.

Posted 38 days ago.

"Oregon-based physicist Gordon Fulks sums it up well: “CO2 is said to be responsible for global warming that is not occurring, for accelerated sea-level rise that is not occurring, for net glacial and sea ice melt that is not occurring . . . and for increasing extreme weather that is not occurring.”

h ttp://nypost.c om/2014/09/14/leo-v-science-vanishing-evidence-for-climate-change/

Posted 39 days ago.

Kendall78

At this stage of the debate (if one would call it that), no one can give you proof you would accept Tired.

That's why we want you to tell us what you would consider proof. Here are some examples:

Educational Sources

Govt Sources

Pubished works by scientists from fields related to climate

Would you accept any of these sources as proof? A simple yes or no would be good enough.

Posted 39 days ago.

Kendall78

"and to define it."

So you will accept whatever difinition we give?

And btw, you are asking us for something, we merely are wanting to clarify what that something is to make certain you get what want. No point in wasting even more time with "proof" that doesn't meet your criteria after all right?

Posted 39 days ago.

Kendall78

We will provide all the "proof" you need when you define what you consider proof.

Once you do that, then I am certain it will be provided for you. Why are you so stubborn on this?

Posted 39 days ago.

mythravere

Oh yea Tiredofit. You know what the difference between a livable biosphere for a given species and a biosphere that won't support the given species life?

A few degrees in temperature. Also acidity in the case of corals.

Posted 39 days ago.

mythravere

"GOT PROOF?

mythravere

We can't provide any proof. You win. :)"Tiredofit

LOL I knew you would start toting what I said out.

Why do you think I put the smiley face in there?

LOL!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. LOL! Notice he took out the smiley face! HAHAHAHAHAHA!

Posted 39 days ago.

Kendall78

We will provide all the "proof" you need when you define what you consider proof.

Once you do that, then I am certain it will be provided for you. Why are you so stubborn on this?

Posted 39 days ago.

Kendall78

Gotcha...I knew you were trying to justify your bad behavior by trying to point out other people's alledged bad behavior. And of course what I said earlier was true but you tried to be clever and copy/pasted yourself into failure. You are so much fun Tired when the game doesn't go your way.

Posted 39 days ago.

Kendall78

I can't prove a negative Tired you silly boy. You want me to prove that the science of manmade global warming is NOT political. tsk tsk

Posted 39 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or