Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
10 hours ago.
by Kendall78
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Stillhere

But admitted margin of error is greater than the supposed rise in temps, do you deny this?? LOL

Posted 188 days ago.

Stillhere

what a fraud you are, how about the margin of error HARRY???

Posted 188 days ago.

harryanderson

I'm encouraged that the oceans are storing the excess heat energy. It gives us time to figure out how to use it. It shouldn't be too difficult to draw heat from the ocean.

Like Rex Tillerson, head of Exxon-Mobile, has said, "(Global warming) is an engineering problem with an engineering solution.” He called it “manageable.”

Posted 188 days ago.

harryanderson

In the last few days, we’ve only been discussing atmospheric temperatures. That’s ridiculous, since the “globe” in global warming includes much more than the atmosphere. The ocean alone has 264 times the mass of the atmosphere, and therefore can store much more heat. In fact, Scientific American reports:

“Scientists estimate that every square meter of the planet has received between 0.5 to 1 watt (an average light bulb emits 60 watts of heat) of excess energy in the last few decades. And more than 90 percent of that energy has entered the oceans and warmed them.”

htt p://ww w.scientificamerican.co m/article/mystery-of-ocean-heat-deepens-as-climate-changes/

And NOAA just updated their global ocean heat content charts. They show the ocean heating up steadily.

ht tp://ww w.nodc.noaa.gov/OC5/3M_HEAT_CONTENT/index1.html

Posted 188 days ago.

Stillhere

Harry? NASSA data and accuracy??? Any interest? Or do we just post propoganda headlines these days?

Posted 188 days ago.

Stillhere

For a person that claims to be "about the science" I find it odd that HARRY won't defend the report he posted!

Posted 188 days ago.

Stillhere

Still don't want to discuss margins of error and NASSA/NOAA data?

Posted 188 days ago.

Stillhere

Harry likes to point out when one misspells a word etc, clearly demonstrating his superiority.

Posted 188 days ago.

harryanderson

"i don't believe there is a time or frequency at which one must be limited too in their personal 'evolving'." (sic)

Nor do I. But evolve means "to change gradually." It doesn't mean to evolve and devolve and evolve and devolve ad infinitum.

When a politician reverses course, then reverses course again over the course of multiple tries for the presidency, I think many voters might conclude such politician cares more about getting elected than the issue.

Posted 188 days ago.

absolem

harryanderson....i believe that the liberal left calls flip-flopping on positions "evolving". Mitt is simply "evolving". i don't believe there is a time or frequency at which one must be limited too in their personal "evolving".

Posted 188 days ago.

Stillhere

perhaps a little less snark this time?

Posted 189 days ago.

Stillhere

Perhaps you can "school" us once again. lol

Posted 189 days ago.

Stillhere

Care to discuss the margin of error yet or are you still ducking that one?

Posted 189 days ago.

Stillhere

Mitt is as relevant to this discussion as ALGORE NO?

Posted 189 days ago.

harryanderson

Well, Mitt Romney has flipped (or is it flopped this time? I can't keep up with his reverses) on anthropogenic climate change again.

He gave a speech in Salt Lake City. The Deseret News reports "He also tackled climate change, describing himself as 'one of those Republicans' who believe the world is getting warmer and people contribute to the temperature changes and calling for 'real leadership' to deal with coal emissions."

Sheesh. I used to like Mitt. He sure looked better than Obama. Now, I don't know. Seems he can't be trusted. How can a guy trust Mitt when you don't know what his position will be tomorrow or the next day?

Posted 189 days ago.

Stillhere

The press release is another attempt to sensationalize and create a perception that simply is not factual. Exaggerate for effect eh Monika?

Posted 189 days ago.

Stillhere

The press release is another attempt to sensationalize and create a perception that simply is not factual. Exaggerate for effect eh Monika?

Posted 189 days ago.

Ohwiseone

That's called nit picking ! Anything to try and back up a misguided point !

Posted 189 days ago.

Stillhere

Huh? Again you make no sense, fact is your claim is unsubstantiated

Posted 189 days ago.

moderation

Plus or minus. That is what I already said. And now you are saying it. That's great.And it was painless,huh?

Posted 189 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or