Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 minutes ago.
by Ithink
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

How is it possible to show YOU Tiredofit ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global warming when you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful?

Posted 37 days ago.

mythravere

How is it possible to show YOU Tiredofit ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global warming when you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful?

Posted 37 days ago.

mythravere

How is it possible to show YOU Tiredofit ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global warming when you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful?

Posted 37 days ago.

mythravere

How is it possible to show YOU Tiredofit ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global warming when you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful?

Posted 37 days ago.

mythravere

How is it possible to show YOU Tiredofit ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global warming when you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful?

Posted 37 days ago.

mythravere

How is it possible to show YOU Tiredofit ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global warming when you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful?

Posted 37 days ago.

mythravere

How is it possible to show YOU Tiredofit ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global warming when you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful?

Posted 37 days ago.

mythravere

How is it possible to show YOU Tiredofit ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global warming when you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful?

Posted 37 days ago.

mythravere

How is it possible to show YOU Tiredofit ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global warming when you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful?

Posted 37 days ago.

mythravere

How is it possible to show YOU Tiredofit ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global warming when you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful?

Posted 37 days ago.

mythravere

How is it possible to show YOU Tiredofit ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global warming when you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful?

Posted 37 days ago.

harryanderson

What is Anthony Watt's expertise, Tiredofit?

Posted 37 days ago.

harryanderson

Dr Richard Feynman can't answer for himself. He died in 1988.

Hah

Posted 37 days ago.

harryanderson

Anthony Watts went to Purdue, but isn't listed as a graduate. He won't discuss his education.

Not exactly who I'd believe over PhD climate experts who publish in scientific journals.

Hah

Posted 37 days ago.

harryanderson

Even the man you referred to before, Professor Bengtsson, agrees.

I love it. Better stick to quoting lawyers and op-ed writers, Tired. You'll be less frustrated.

Posted 37 days ago.

harryanderson

The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change.

Exactly. That's what the actual climate scientists say. 97% of those who are experts in the field agree. We shouldn't listen as closely to the opinions of those who aren't climate scientists and haven't published in the field.

Thanks again for confirming the broad agreement among the experts.

Posted 37 days ago.

Ohwiseone

More ramblings of a demented idiot ! Hows the weather in Canada liar ?

Posted 37 days ago.

harryanderson

appeal to authority?

But Tiredofit, It was YOU who referred to Prof. Bengtsson.

Don't you even read this stuff you copy and paste? It seems not. Hah.

Posted 37 days ago.

harryanderson

And what does Lennart Bengtsson write about greenhouse gasses? He writes,

“That the Earth's energy balance is slowly changing due to increasing greenhouse gases and anthropogenic aerosols is not questioned by the scientific community. This is physically well understood and based on fundamental physical principles known since at least the middle of the 19th century.”

ht tp://klimazwiebel.blogspot.co m/2010/02/lennart-bengtsson-climate-change-as.html

So the climate scientist to whom Tiredofit pointed us says it’s “not questioned” and “based on fundamental physical principles.”

And that’s why Joe Bast of Heartland says the “scientific debate” is “of enormous frustration.” It’s based on “fundamental physical principles” that aren’t subject to lawyerly spin.

Posted 37 days ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit tried to overwhelm us with posts about a “Bengtsson scandal.”

And what did Professor Bengtsson himself tell the Guardian about the scandal?

“I do not believe there is any systematic ‘cover-up’ of scientific evidence on climate change or that academics' work is being 'deliberately suppressed', as the Times front page suggests.”

htt p://ww w.theguardian.co m/environment/2014/may/16/rejected-climate-science-paper-environmental-research-letters

Posted 37 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or