Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
5 hours ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

It's what you can prove and just like Larry and Moe, you have proven nothing

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

I couldn't care less what you think

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

To do what to myself?

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

I don't know if I've mentioned a revenue- neutral carbon tax. If I did, it was many moons ago.

I'm confident I haven't, as you say, "advocated" it.

How do you feel about it?

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

I don't know if I've mentioned a revenue- neutral carbon tax. If I did, it was many moons ago.

I'm confident I haven't, as you say, "advocated" it.

How do you feel about it?

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Feel free to spend that time to **** yourself

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Politicians are creatures of habit and about thier own power, doesn't mean they are right

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

I must go now. It'll give you time to think about the carbon tax issue you impulsively brought up.

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Lol

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Really? You have not mentioned a revenue neutral tax??? Be careful

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

"Sure Harry won't cost a dime"

Are you suggesting the conservative economists and Republicans are lying when they push a revenue-neutral carbon tax?

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

"Yeah I know you don't either but that's exactly what you advocate"

Not true. I haven't even mentioned taxing carbon until you brought it up. It's dishonest to ascribe positions to me that I haven't taken.

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Sure Harry won't cost a dime

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Yeah I know you don't either but that's exactly what you advocate

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

"That is the plan, to tax carbon, do you deny that."

I've endorsed no plan except to think about our choices in our personal lives.

But since you've raised it, a number of Republicans have proposed a carbon tax, with 100% of the revenue gain being used to reduce personal and corporate income taxes.

I haven't made my mind up on this proposal. Since you brought up the issue, do you have any thoughts on it?

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Just because I see a day when fossil fuels are less advantageous, doesn't mean o support the socialist take over of our energy sector

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

Harry your pseudo intellectual BS does not impress me

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

"Then you have Munster on your side, yeah that screams credible."

I know not to whom you refer. Just for the record, I don't take sides in your partisan bickering, and nobody is speaking on my behalf or at my behest. I believe you refer to somebody else being on my side so you won't have to address my post, which concerns how we adjust to a future where we burn less fossil fuel.

Posted 10 days ago.

Tiredofit

That is the plan, to tax carbon, do you deny that

Posted 10 days ago.

harryanderson

"You just love to hang on to a phrase and try to parse it into what it's not"

So what does "most likely" mean to you?

Posted 10 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or