Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
14 minutes ago.
by Stillhere
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

I thinks it time we stop the debate on this issue itself and start the debate on peoples motivations in debating this issue.

Posted 34 days ago.

mythravere

"Ill keep asking, you will keep insulting and asking irrelevant questions."

You mean questions that shoot holes in your argument?

Yea we all know why you only talk about specific things that have room for argument in them.

Like not talking about world wide weather and environmental phenomenon that points to a warming planet and then explaining why those phenomena are naturally occurring rather than due to mans influence.

That right there would be part of you proving your own position. Which you refuse to do.

And you said you wanted to have an honest debate. Pffft! No you don't.

Posted 34 days ago.

mythravere

Yep. Its the sleaziest way to "win" a debate.

Prove nothing of your own positions.

And when the other party strives to outline and actually gives proof to back up their position. Never acknowledge any of its right.

And thats without going into how sleazy it is to make baseless accusations about people and the political leanings and the constant ad hominem attacks.

And because I know he will wail about what I said earlier in regards to meeting his baseless accusation with my own. Sorry pal you started that crap way before I did.

Posted 34 days ago.

harryanderson

Scientific proof has been proffered. You won't consider it consider because, as you wrote, "It's not a scientific discussion."

End of story.

Posted 34 days ago.

harryanderson

Scientific proof has been proffered. You won't consider it consider because, as you wrote, "It's not a scientific discussion."

Posted 34 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Tiredofit

harryanderson

Myth,

You aren't very smart Just who is doing the insulting troll ??

Posted 34 days ago.

mythravere

This isn't debate but a game of political brinkmanship that you play Tiredofit.

The facts are truthfully irrelevant since you will say they are wrong no matter their veracity.

Posted 34 days ago.

mythravere

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful! You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful! You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful! You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful! You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful! You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful!

Posted 34 days ago.

mythravere

Hey look there quoting out of context with the omission of pertinent facts relating to that comment that Harry made.

Of instead of making that comment you could have answered the questions.

Problem is you avoid the truth.

Posted 35 days ago.

mythravere

Here be those two questions.

True or False Tiredofit.

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

True or false Tiredofit?

You are just on here for a cheap laugh by jerking peoples chains?

Posted 35 days ago.

mythravere

"Don't feel too bad, it's not an easy case to make given the facts. In just figured you would be more challenging than myth" Tiredofit

Well when you ignore the facts that people put on the table...thats easy.

Besides I challenged you with two questions that you refuse to answer.

Posted 35 days ago.

harryanderson

"Can't you see that you're being baited?" I was warning myth that you were baiting him, not justifying you for baiting him.

Posted 35 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Typical republican , delay, deny and lie ,lie ,lie ! Please don't duck !

Posted 35 days ago.

harryanderson

"There was a poster that claimed to know Myths true identity and was going to expose it, I never blamed myth for baiting him, I called it what it was, OUT OF LINE, YOU on the other hand tried to justify it. sad"

I tried to justify baiting? Don't think so. When did this happen?

Posted 35 days ago.

harryanderson

"I am the one voice you guys will not shout down."

Nobody's trying to shout you down. That would be easy. We're trying get you to think.

Posted 35 days ago.

harryanderson

"And of course you tacitly endorsed said charge"

How so?

Posted 35 days ago.

harryanderson

"What do you mean you "pegged" me?

Posted 35 days ago.

harryanderson

“Either you can make the case for the title of YOUR thread or you CANNOT”

I believe you’re a little confused. The title of this thread is “Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.”

That did seem true at the time, but things have changed. I’m not sure what the latest polls say about how effective the propaganda campaign has been lately.

It does seem the propaganda campaign has become more vicious and more irrational. Your behavior is prima facie evidence of that.

Posted 35 days ago.

harryanderson

For the last month I have asked the same thing, can anyone prove man causes global warming. And you have failed.

Not true. I haven’t even tried. I haven’t tried because I believed myth when he said you didn’t want proof.

And now that you’ve defined proof as “a concept that is really only applicable in mathematics, because math deals with abstract concepts and definitions,” you’ve shown myth to be correct. You’ve made it clear you will deal only in “abstract concepts and definitions” rather than real data that is observable and measurable.

Myth and Kendall pegged you a long time ago, Tiredofit.

Posted 35 days ago.

harryanderson

Yesterday, you told me to "make (your) case" and added, "When your case is complete, I will agree or disagree but not until then"

My "case" is that CO2 is a greenhouse gas. Now will you do what you said you would do, and agree or disagree?

Posted 35 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or