Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
2 hours ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

"From Leafy to Lifeless: Tropical Rainforest Once Covered Antarctica

Time magazine

Hmmmm wonder how that happened"

I dont know? A thing called continental drift.

Posted 7 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit can you show where billions of tons of co2 being put in the atmosphere since the beginning of the industrial revolution has no effect on changing the chemical composition of the air and is a contributing factor in the warming of this planet?

Apparently you have some evidence to support your case. Why not share it?

Posted 7 days ago.

mythravere

The funds coming from Heartland on the other hand serve one purpose and one purpose only.

To take over the debate on this issue and cast piles of doubt.

Posted 7 days ago.

mythravere

Another thing about funding is that can you show that scientific funding or rather the fact of securing more funding is skewing the results?

I see no reason to believe thats the case.

You on the other blindly assume that is the case.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

The warming that is

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Still, the findings are alarming enough to cause several scientists to suffer total meltdowns, as CO2 levels are rising rapidly and are showing few signs of slowing down.

Hello, it quit 17 years ago

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

That's from an alarmist site, and they even make the government control pitch there as well. Somehow they never explain how the ice got there

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

If you’d visited Antarctica 50 million years ago, you could have lounged beneath swaying palm trees and enjoyed balmy 68-degree weather.

Yes, seriously. Drilling off Antarctica’s east coast has revealed fossil pollens that came from a “near-tropical” rainforest that once covered the icy continent, AFP reports.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

What you alarmist won't admit is that there are massive holes in your narrative, You would just rather ignore.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

From Leafy to Lifeless: Tropical Rainforest Once Covered Antarctica

Time magazine

Hmmmm wonder how that happened

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

And Ms Kopacz freely admits that the exaggeration is TO SECURE FUNDING.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Much like Y2k and other "crisis" some people just love the drama, and pending doom.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Kinda like you saying that the government WANTS to take over the energy industry.

Have you ever seen govt inclined to control something LESS?

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Just because there are no glaciers in ohio doesn't mean the sky is falling

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Myth you are not very bright o realize,BUT try to separate the natural warming that ended 17.yrs ago, from PROOF that man was involved.

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

You'd detail why you are right. Nope.

You Moe and curly have wasted page after page attacking me. Give mo ONE PROVABLE FACT showing man's CO2 is warming the earth

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

And this whole thing about funding? When you scream about someone working for heartland, are you not claiming oil money is tainting the info?...hypocritical much?

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

But by all means Tiredofit. Please do explain why this is all natural.

Sorry it a up to you to show why it's not. Was the medieval warming period natural?

Posted 7 days ago.

Tiredofit

Because if you could you would have already to shut this "debate" down.lol this is what your side has been trying to do wow

Posted 7 days ago.

mythravere

And this whole thing about funding? Its just an easy excuse for you to discount the reality of mans role in climate change.

You conservative types like to grab that low hanging fruit.

Posted 7 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or