Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
seconds ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Tiredofit

) There hasn't been any global warming since 1997: If nothing changes in the next year, we're going to have kids who graduate from high school who will have never seen any "global warming" during their lifetimes. That's right; the temperature of the planet has essentially been flat for 17 years. This isn't a controversial assertion either. Even the former Director of the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, Phil Jones, admits that it's true. Since the planet was cooling from 1940-1975 and the upswing in temperature afterward only lasted 22 years, a 17 year pause is a big deal. It also begs an obvious question: How can we be experiencing global warming if there's no actual "global warming?"

Posted 16 days ago.

Ohwiseone

More ramblings of a demented idiot ! Hows the weather in Canada liar ?

Posted 16 days ago.

Tiredofit

But liars love to use the phrase anyway

Posted 16 days ago.

Tiredofit

The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change. Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make.

Posted 16 days ago.

Tiredofit

The Myth of the Climate Change '97%'

Posted 16 days ago.

Tiredofit

Given that the environmental movement has been around since the 1960s, it has taken decades for the public to grasp its intent and the torrents of lies that have been used to advance it. “More people,” notes Dr. Ball, “are starting to understand that what they’re told about climate change by academia, the mass media, and the government is wrong, especially the propaganda coming from the UN and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.”

Posted 16 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is no scientific support for the UN theory. CO2, despite being a minor element of the Earth’s atmosphere, is essential for all life on Earth because it is the food that nourishes all vegetation. The Earth has passed through many periods of high levels of CO2 and many cycles of warming and cooling that are part of the life of the planet.

Posted 16 days ago.

Tiredofit

A History of the Disastrous Global Warming Hoax March 31, 2014

Posted 16 days ago.

harryanderson

appeal to authority?

But Tiredofit, It was YOU who referred to Prof. Bengtsson.

Don't you even read this stuff you copy and paste? It seems not. Hah.

Posted 16 days ago.

harryanderson

And what does Lennart Bengtsson write about greenhouse gasses? He writes,

“That the Earth's energy balance is slowly changing due to increasing greenhouse gases and anthropogenic aerosols is not questioned by the scientific community. This is physically well understood and based on fundamental physical principles known since at least the middle of the 19th century.”

ht tp://klimazwiebel.blogspot.co m/2010/02/lennart-bengtsson-climate-change-as.html

So the climate scientist to whom Tiredofit pointed us says it’s “not questioned” and “based on fundamental physical principles.”

And that’s why Joe Bast of Heartland says the “scientific debate” is “of enormous frustration.” It’s based on “fundamental physical principles” that aren’t subject to lawyerly spin.

Posted 16 days ago.

Tiredofit

As they appeal to authority, they still CANNOT provide a single FACT

Posted 16 days ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit tried to overwhelm us with posts about a “Bengtsson scandal.”

And what did Professor Bengtsson himself tell the Guardian about the scandal?

“I do not believe there is any systematic ‘cover-up’ of scientific evidence on climate change or that academics' work is being 'deliberately suppressed', as the Times front page suggests.”

htt p://ww w.theguardian.co m/environment/2014/may/16/rejected-climate-science-paper-environmental-research-letters

Posted 16 days ago.

Tiredofit

Just ONE PROVABLE FACT proving man causes global warming, lolol see how the have no answer

Posted 16 days ago.

Tiredofit

These socialist on this forum cannot PROVE one single thing they claim to know

Posted 16 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is AMPLE evidence that the world has been much colder and much warmer without man. What is lacking is proof that somehow this cycle is different, and we must hand over our very lives to government

Posted 16 days ago.

harryanderson

Where were we? Oh, yeah, I remember now. Tiredofit was agreeing that scientific papers overwhelming support the idea of anthropogenic global warming. He posted:

"This is a very important paper because it constitutes the first direct experimental refutation of the theory that increased atmospheric CO2 from industrial activity is the cause of increased global average temperatures."

Tiredofit acknowledged that only one paper out of the many published directly experimentally refutes the conclusion that CO2 causes climate change.

Posted 16 days ago.

Ohwiseone

The dependence on fossil fuel energy sources since the industrial revolution has undoubtedly shaped economic prosperity for the developed world. However, an unfortunate by-product of fossil fuel combustion is the emission of carbon dioxide (CO2), an important greenhouse gas that is known to influence long-term climatic variations through its ability to absorb infra-red radiation.

Human emissions of CO2 have resulted in atmospheric levels higher than any period over the last 20 million years. The continued emission of CO2 will lead to widespread climate change related impacts. ~~Climate Change Research Centre (CCRC) UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052 Australia All I advocate is there IS research that says man has and will have a role in climate change !

Posted 16 days ago.

Ohwiseone

University of new south wales is not a government !So now what kind of excuse do you have tiredbrain !

Posted 16 days ago.

Ohwiseone

University of new south wales is not a government !So now what kind of excuse do you have tiredbrain !

Posted 16 days ago.

Tiredofit

There is AMPLE evidence that the world has been much colder and much warmer without man

Posted 16 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or