Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
9 days ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Ohwiseone

Harry there is no " rational discourse" with these brainless minions of the right , when they have no logical argument they resort to the casting of aspersions !

Posted 107 days ago.

Stillhere

konec have you ever heard a con artist that didn't have a slick tongue?

Posted 107 days ago.

Stillhere

Feel free to spew your propaganda in our little forum, It seems to be quite the source of joy for you. Tell us how the earth has a fever and only Govt can save us.

Posted 107 days ago.

Stillhere

When you introduce the term anti science, your views on science become germain. When you cite false and debunked statistics your honesty is also a valid subject. When you pretend to be a republican or claim a connection to WV and the mid Ohio valley your area of residence is a valid question although apparently a big international secret

Posted 107 days ago.

Kunectdots

"God darnit, Mr. Anderson, you use your tongue prettier than a twenty dollar wh-ore."

Maybe you should have been an attorney!

Posted 108 days ago.

harryanderson

And such tactics "generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.”

Or, in the words of my original response, it foils rational discourse.

Posted 108 days ago.

harryanderson

“An Internet troll, or simply troll in Internet slang, is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum or chat room, with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.”

ht tp://ww w.urbandictionary.co m/define.php?term=Internet%20Troll

I’d say changing the subject from

1.climate change to the 2014 election to

2. my politics to

3.county of residence to

4. the origin of man

all iwithin a couple of hours, qualifies as posting “… irrelevant or off-topic messages.”

and I’d say calling people “useful idiots” and “frauds” qualifies as posting “inflammatory” messages.

As for having “the primary intent of provoking other users,” I’ll not make that charge. I’m no mind reader.

However, you might want to do some soul-searching on that score, IMHO.

Posted 108 days ago.

harryanderson

“Tea party challenges to Republican senators are fizzling across the country, leaving Mississippi as the only state where a longtime Republican officeholder is seriously endangered by a primary threat from his right.”

Read more: ht tp://ww w.washingtontimes.co m/news/2014/mar/3/tea-party-loses-some-steam-in-gop-races/#ixzz3Ldul90jR

And of course, the challenge in Mississippi also failed. The Republican Party moved back to its traditional pragmatism and away from the firebombs.

Posted 108 days ago.

mythravere

Has anyone stated that we much submit to the government.

Better yet don't get angry at the government. Get angry with the "citizens" of this nation for electing such an inept group of nitwits.

Posted 108 days ago.

Stillhere

And I am anti science huh? Harry did women originate from a mans rib?

Posted 108 days ago.

harryanderson

Here’s one example of how Republican-leaning folks repudiated the right.

“The U.S. Chamber of Commerce says it will back ‘pro-business’ candidates against Tea Party-styled opponents in this year’s elections, largely in response to conservative lawmakers fueling last year's partial government shutdown fight.”

htt p://ww w.foxnews.co m/politics/2014/01/11/conservatives-question-us-chamber-plan-to-spend-millions-to-defeat-tea-party/

Posted 108 days ago.

Stillhere

Tell me how I am anti science and you believe women came from a rib

Posted 108 days ago.

Stillhere

Tell us how we must submit to Govt or die in a fiery global warming death LOL

Posted 108 days ago.

Stillhere

Troll on brutha

Posted 108 days ago.

Stillhere

Glad you didn't keep your vow to stay away, I miss correcting you.

Posted 108 days ago.

Stillhere

Please feel free to troll these forums at your leisure.

Posted 108 days ago.

Stillhere

I don't care where you went to gradeschool yet you feel the need to tell me. WHY was that>? Trying to gain some credibility>?

Posted 108 days ago.

Stillhere

Again I ask, how the mid terms were a repudation of the right?

Posted 108 days ago.

harryanderson

"I have led by example"

Once again, I don't care where you live. I've never asked. It's funny that you congratulate yourself on answering a question that hasn't been asked, and about which nobody cares.

"Harry, set the record straight."

Why do you care where I live?

Posted 108 days ago.

Stillhere

Do troll the forum with your global warming nonsense. I will be here to check you at every turn.

Posted 108 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or