Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
7 hours ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

How is it possible to show YOU Tiredofit ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global warming when you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

Posted 9 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

Posted 9 days ago.

mythravere

"UN Global Warming Propaganda Campaign: Return to Perceived Success Indicates Desperation

Anthony Watts / 1 day ago September 12, 2014"

Utilizing a source that is biased on this issue shows your desperation.

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

by 2010.

The Test: Did population go down in these areas during that period, indicating climate refugees were on the move? The answer, no.

The Proof: Population actually gained in some Caribbean Island for which 2010 census figures were available. Then when challenged on these figures, the UN tried to hide the original claim from view.

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

The Claim: 50 million climate refugees will be produced by climate change by the year 2010. Especially hard hit will be river delta areas, and low lying islands in the Caribbean and Pacific. The UN 62nd General assembly in July 2008 said: …it had been estimated that there would be between 50 million and 200 million environmental migrants by 2010.

Posted 9 days ago.

mythravere

If those two questions are true then there is no rational reason to give you any information.

Its like giving a bum a dollar knowing full well its going to go to drugs or booze. Its a waste of time and effort!

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

UN Global Warming Propaganda Campaign: Return to Perceived Success Indicates Desperation

Anthony Watts / 1 day ago September 12, 2014

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

The fact that you cannot provide ONE SINGLE PROVABLE FACT showing man causes global waring says way more.

Posted 9 days ago.

mythravere

True or false Tiredofit?

You are just on here for a cheap laugh by jerking peoples chains?

Posted 9 days ago.

mythravere

True or False Tiredofit.

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

Posted 9 days ago.

mythravere

Tiredofit those are two questions that I think you should be concerned with answering.

Because not answering them completely blows any sort of credibility you have.

Furthermore not answering them lends weight to those two questions being truthful.

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

List of excuses for ‘not givin proof’ of global warming is now up to 256231152

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

List of excuses for ‘the pause’ in global warming is now up to 52

Posted 9 days ago.

Tiredofit

Sure myth, that's why,lolol NO its because you DONT HAVE ANY PROOF.

Posted 9 days ago.

mythravere

"Give it your best shot sport, you said you HAD proof but wouldn't give it to ME. lol"Tiredofit

The question is why won't I give it to you.

Its because you will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

That the take away from talking with you on here about this issue.

Posted 9 days ago.

mythravere

Even Princeton Makes Mistakes

Posted on 26 May 2011 by Chris Colose

Posted 9 days ago.

mythravere

"New all-time satellite-era record for Antarctic sea ice extent"

Thats all good and well but what you fail to mention is thickness.

How does the thickness stack up against what has been the norm in the past?

No surprise you glossed over that FACT. LOL.

Posted 9 days ago.

mythravere

True or False Tiredofit.

You will always say that the proof we provide is false even if it is correct and truthful.

True or false Tiredofit?

You are just on here for a cheap laugh by jerking peoples chains?

Answer these two questions first.

Come on Tiredofit you afraid to answer these questions?

Posted 9 days ago.

mythravere

Kevin Roeten. Highly biased. Neeeext.

Posted 9 days ago.

Kendall78

"No warming in 17 years lol but yet you still believe brother GORE"

That would be two lies.

1. There have been warming.

2. I never listened to Al Gore on this subject.

Why do you guess so wrong so much Tired?

OPh...please provide you definition of "proof" and "fact" if you really want information.

Otherwise it seems you are a blowhard.

Posted 9 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or