Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
3 hours ago.
by Ohwiseone
harryanderson
#1

Thankfully, the anti-science propaganda campaign surrounding man-made climate change seems to have lost some of its effect.

Are you seeing storm clouds on the horizon? Two recent studies suggest that the latest anti-science campaign is following its forerunners--the propaganda campaigns attempting to refute science that tobacco causes cancer, that CFC's caused the hole in the ozone layer, and so on—into oblivion. Global warming denial seems to have climbed to a peak in 2010, and global warming acceptance is now climbing. This bodes well for rational public policy.

 
 

Member Comments

Kendall78

"lets start with the admitted maring of errpr in NASSA data"

And how does that disprove all the facts showing climate change due to humanity is happening?

That's right...it doesn't.

You seem to lean on ignorance as your main answer to everything. I suppose you also believe in the God of the Gaps. You obviously have no real scientific answer to why the climate is changing, so you approach the problem with your head in the sand and basically say, "Nope...not happening..nope nope...not happening."

Posted 8 days ago.

Kendall78

"Most of the southern slave owners were republicans !"

Evidence? I'm just curious how your conjured up that statement.

Posted 8 days ago.

Ohwiseone

See that's your problem dingle berry ! You just believe you're so superior when the reality is you're just another lying troll that does nothing but repeat your parties official line !

Posted 8 days ago.

Ohwiseone

And was this data non- partisan ?

Posted 8 days ago.

Stillhere

Easy to see why he cannot comment on the issue at hand or understand the math involved

Posted 8 days ago.

Stillhere

Ohwiseone

Most of the southern slave owners were republicans !

THIS is the brilliance of our friend NOTSOWISEONE.

Posted 8 days ago.

Stillhere

I am citing NASSA data, you are spewing hatefulness about me, LOL yep

Posted 8 days ago.

Ohwiseone

On our way to 500 pages ! I wonder how many pages we will lose when the troll is excised again !

Posted 8 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Stop denying research and findings or just go away !

Posted 8 days ago.

Stillhere

I see as always you have nothing to add as your mental capacity restricts you. Comment on the NASSA data or go away, your choice

Posted 8 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Bullsh^t

Posted 8 days ago.

Ohwiseone

Ah , the extreme" bury em in ********" strategy of the most famous troll here !328 pages of republinut denial and crappola ! Lets see if you can reach 500 !

Posted 8 days ago.

Stillhere

So you on the socialist left wish to give govt control over our energy sector based on that! Foolish at best

Posted 8 days ago.

Stillhere

By their OWN DATA the total warming they claim falls within the margin of error.

Posted 8 days ago.

Stillhere

for recent years the error bar for global annual means is about ±0.05°C, for years around 1900 it is about ±0.1°C. The error bars are about twice as big for seasonal means and three times as big for monthly means.

Also according to NASSA

Posted 8 days ago.

Stillhere

according to NASSA

Since 1880, Earth’s average surface temperature has warmed by about 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degrees Celsius),

Posted 8 days ago.

Stillhere

according to NASSA

Since 1880, Earth’s average surface temperature has warmed by about 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degrees Celsius),

Posted 8 days ago.

Stillhere

harryanderson

It shows your desperation that you quibble over which year was warmest by a very small amount.

Hmmmmmm pot have you seen kettle?

Posted 8 days ago.

Stillhere

harryanderson

100 is greater than 99.99, but not by much. It's a statistical tie. Very simple.

This is how you defended your statement last time

Posted 8 days ago.

Stillhere

harryanderson

100 is greater than 99.99, but not by much. It's a statistical tie. Very simple.

This is how you defended your statement last time

Posted 8 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or