There is no movement in the United States to kill people in the name of second amendment rights but there is a movement that has murdered 1,200,000 children in the name of women's rights

"...behavior doesn't have to follow wants."

Ithink nailed it.

It really jerks my chain when people say things like, "He made me mad enough to punch him in the nose."

I love my freedom. There's no way I'm letting anybody or anything snatch it away from me. That includes what Ithink calls my own "wants."

h ttp://ije.oxfordjournals.o rg/content/26/3/657.abstract

" Life expectancy at age 20 for gay and bisexual men ranged from 34.0 years to 46.3 years for the 3% and 9% scenarios respectively. These were all lower than the 54.3 year life expectancy at age 20 for all men."

Myth you try hard to imply that gay behavior is normal, but it can't be done. We waste a lot of time on a subject that has no impact on our security or the economy.

I have never said that gay behavior is a sin. That is up to God, and I have enough sins of my own to work on. I don't care what they do in private except when they try to force me to approve of it, or try to change the definition of a family oriented establishment like marriage.

Watching them force their behavior on us in public, is as uncomfortable to me as a two headed person. Very sad and not normal.

And behavior doesn't have to follow wants.

"Homosexualality (sic) is a genetic defect."

I agree, provided there is such a gene.

I can't believe that a loving God would put something in our DNA that would make it difficult for us follow his instructions.

Homosexualality is a genetic defect. For some reason they all want to have children and pass on the mutation.

The amount of detail they can pull down is immense.

They dont even need GPS to track you. Cell tower triangulation can do that just as well.

Not to mention that there are more than likely filters on communication lines that are aimed at picking out targeted words etc. Then linked right back to you.

If people really knew the streets would full of people calling for some heads...

And Ithink I have a big issue with the scanning of private web traffic and all that entails.

That can of worms was opened after 9-11.

Dont think for a second I support any of that. Because I do not.

I dont think people truthfully grasp how invasive that is.

All they have to do is type a word or phrase in and EVERYTHING put out there is collated and stored.

Also the patterns of when and where those posts are scrutinized.

They know exactly where the hot zones of anti government postings are.

I guarantee you everything we have said on this site is saved somewhere in the NSA's files.

But seeing as how your beliefs on this issue are informed by your religious beliefs and seeing as how that is a personal matter. Dictating how things should be according to what you believe is tantamount to forcing your beliefs on another.

That goes against the true spirit of freedom.

As I stated brother and sister etc relationships have serious issues attached to them that has nothing to do with any moral quandary.

Inbreeding can introduce genetic defects into the offspring.

A homosexual couple isn't going to be faced with that issue.

Besides not all of them engage in "play" as I talked about already. At least not in the manner you implied.

Ithink. I didn't want to bring this up but I am going to. Sorry if it offends but its the truth.

The using of body parts in ways not intended also takes place between a man and women too.

Far more than you think. And I am willing to bet a sizable number of anti-gay heterosexual couples engage in "play" of that type.

Heck I seen a story once that stated that the adult entertainment industry has more customers in conservative areas than other less conservative areas.

My mother was married at 15. I think that the reason behind age of consent though is that young kids/teens dont have the necessary reasoning skills when it comes to making relationship decisions at such a young age.

Age of consent laws are on the books to protect younger folks from being taken advantage of. Incest and marrying your sister have obvious non-moral determined problems associated with them. Namely genetic issues from siblings etc if a pregnancy resulted from the relationship.

And animals. W T F. Its obvious why.

But two adults? As long as they willingly consent. Then where is the problem?

There should be none.

Homosexuals are deviants. It is not natural is a sin. Not for me to judge, I base this on the Bible.PrPremarital s,ex is as well and I am guilty of that so I cast no stones.

"US plan calls for more scanning of private Web traffic, email "

You democrats should be ashamed to even mention the word "freedom"

And religion sure must be mighty important to your chosen leaders. Everyone take note of the fortune we are going to pay to send idiot Biden to the Pope's festivities. Wahoo !! What a worthy cause for our nation in debt.

Why so angry Nancy

You will never be free from the influence of religion,myth. Do not steal. Straight from the Bible. Why don't you work to get rid of robbery being a crime???? The Bible is the origin of our laws.

But you are not rally interested in other laws. You are pushing the homosexual special interest agenda with all your might.

It would change who I am, to have marriage be represented by two same sex people. They cannot be parents of a family and invite early death by using body parts in ways that were not intended.Great cause for you libs to endorse.

Gay marriage is not about equality. It is about changing the definition of marriage. If that happens, it will no longer define the permanent family relationship my husband and I have, and I will call it SOMETHING ELSE.

Brother and sister have just as much right to be "equal" as two men. You are discriminating.

The fact is our laws around marriage are based on morality in many cases.

No one said anything about raping children. If two syblings wished to marry, who is harmed?? If a 14 yr old wishes to marry a 50 yr old again who is harmed. Most women were married much younger than is accepted today in older periods of history for a variety of reasons. Don't try to twist wait I say with your sick mind.

I would think that most folks would be fine with those laws but they are in fact strictly made on moral grounds.

Despite the fact that most of our gg grandmothers were married at 14, we don't allow it now for moral reasons

Age of consent laws, **********, incest etc are all based on morality when you get down to it. You cannot marry your sister or a farm animal. By your logic Myth if no one is harmed these things should be ok?