Sign In | Create an Account | Welcome, . My Account | Logout | Subscribe | Submit News | Facebook | Twitter | All Access E-Edition | Home RSS
 
 
 
Latest Post:
Started By:
Rank:
Category
521 days ago.
by burningdownthehouse
Tinfoilhat
#1

There is no movement in the United States to kill people in the name of second amendment rights but there is a movement that has murdered 1,200,000 children in the name of women's rights

The silver tongued talking heads on the magic living room box would have us believe that the country is in an uproar over the alleged murders of 26 people at an elementary school in Newtown, CT. An investigation is still pending. But the allegations are flying. Generally speaking, the anti-constitutionalists who don't own guns, have never fired guns and certainly have limited ability to identify them, would be willing to take away one of our most important constitutional right because they believe it would make them more "safe". None of the gun violence in America has been committed in the name of gun rights. Also, keep in mind, these anti-constitutionalists generally are of the same demographic that also believes that murdering 1,200,000 American children in 2012 in the name of women's rights is acceptable.

 
 

Member Comments

mythravere

This would also be a good place to point out the Military Industrial Complex and the harm it is doing to this nation.

It all comes down to how their business is conducted. The MIC being populated by companies who need war to survive buy the politicians who make the decisions to go to war.

No wonder PNAC stated that America needed a Pearl Harbor like attack to justify this nation rebuild its defenses. PNAC had heavy ties to the defense industry by the way.

Then O'l Bushy and his warhawks come along by dang we get a Pearl Harbor like attack on our soil.

Rather convenient dont you think?

Nah our own folks wouldn't allow an attack to take place on our soil for political ends!

And money!

Posted 567 days ago.

mythravere

The simple fact is you can bellow till you lungs explode about abortion.

Until you show a total respect for life whether it be a baby or a military aged male etc. Until you get right with that then you will called out on your hypocrisy.

You say you care you might. But once their old enough to go die in war there are quite a few on the right who in a haze of war glorification are more than willing to send people to their deaths for lies and dead dinosaurs in the ground.

Posted 567 days ago.

mythravere

Who was the leader when the War in Iraq was decided on as a course of action?

Given what policies were put forth by PNAC. The Iraq war was in on the books for quite some time by the NeoCons.

Posted 567 days ago.

mythravere

Ahh I knew the deflections using examples of democrats agreeing to go to war were coming.

Pointless I say because my critique is squarely focused on the right.

I am talking about them and solely them.

Posted 567 days ago.

mythravere

A comment mentioned not too long after 9-11 by Bush sums it up best. "if you're not with us you're against us"

That in a nutshell perfectly frames the rightwing mindset.

Another righty mentioned that he can come to an agreement with liberals as long as they agree with what he says.

To me. This country will never move forward if we have one party that will in the name of politics set itself up in such a manner that their actions hinder the operation of this nation.

Whats really sickening is that the manner in which rightwing politicians and constituents conduct their "business" can be attributed directly to moneyed interests wanting things only their way and then setting out and buying the support to get what they want.

Posted 568 days ago.

mythravere

Deciding to lie about the facts surrounding WMD's forced 4000+ American soldiers and countless civilians into death.

Until a 100% rate regarding respect for life is shown by the right then anything said about saving unborn lives is simply going to be dismissed as nothing more than hollow words.

You say you care about life buts you really dont.

And dont spew the bs about soldiers volunteering. True they do and I thank them for it. But since they are volunteering to put there lives on the line for us then we owe it to them to only put them in harms way for the right reasons.

Not corporate sponsored resource grabbing!

Posted 568 days ago.

harryanderson

"so what are YOU willing to do to take your own personal responsibility then Harry?"

Whatever it takes.

Posted 568 days ago.

Mc doesn't seem to know what personal means.

And Ryan's plan will sure help more children than the" bankrupt America socialist democrats". And where is their budget? Oh that's right, it is one of those transparent secret deals of the obama bunch.

Posted 568 days ago.

harryanderson

"interesting how you forget your responsibility for your own actions"

That statement isn't true.

Posted 570 days ago.

harryanderson

"those poor widdle babies that you won't even help feed"

Personally, I'd make the fathers and mothers feed them first. If they didn't, I would remove their ability to ever enjoy sex again, then I would feed the babies.

How's that for choice? People can choose to assume responsibility for their sexual behavior or lose their sexual organs. It seems to me that we could solve a lot of both our abortion and welfare problems this way.

Posted 570 days ago.

harryanderson

And ScottMc writes,

“To expect the average human/mammal to not have sex is simply pipe dreaming. Please put it down.”

Anyone who believes she or he cannot control her or his sexual urges is doomed to be enslaved by her or his sexual urges. Maybe someone who can’t tell the difference between humans and other mammals should resign from the human race and go live with apes.

Posted 570 days ago.

harryanderson

Tiredofit says that “the vast majority of abortions are for the convenience of the parties involved.”

I don’t know of any figures on what percentage of abortions are for convenience’s sake, but the point is that abortions can be avoided if men and women would make more responsible sexual choices.

Like Ithink says, “People need to take responsibility for their choices. Be a real man or woman, not an ignorant animal.” In my opinion, any “real man” would be happy to bust his hump for the child that resulted from his sperm.

Posted 570 days ago.

Mc. thinks everyone is just like himself. He has no idea that most Americans are decent caring people.

If we condone murdering innocent babies we are guilty,too. Killing is never right.

Becoming pregnant is a choice. People need to take responsibility for their choices. Be a real man or woman, not an ignorant animal.

Posted 570 days ago.

harryanderson

We have to do something about abortion. Unfortunately, I don't think simply outlawing abortion will solve the problem because outlawing doesn't address the underlying cause, which is sexual activity outside its intended purpose.

Posted 572 days ago.

mythravere

And the flip side of that is that you can be anti-war,anti-nuclear,anti-drones,anti-guns,pro-animal rights and yet still be pro-abortion.

Its funny the glaring hypocrisy that both sides exhibit.

Innocent lives are taken in all of the scenarios mentioned by 420. Do they possess less value than unborn life?

Going the other way people profess an extreme level of respect and care should be shown for the tiniest of animals but yet an unborn child should be allowed to be discarded on the whim of the mother.

Disgustingly funny.

Posted 572 days ago.

fourtwenty

Only in America can you be pro-death penalty, pro-war, pro-unmanned drone bombs, pro-nuclear weapons, pro-guns, pro-torture, pro-land mines, and still call yourself ‘pro-life.

Posted 573 days ago.
 
 
 
 

Post a Comment

You must first login before you can comment.

*Your email address:
*Password:
Remember my email address.
or